scholarly journals The impact of complete chemotherapy stop on the overall survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer in first-line setting: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1737-1746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Andresson Lima Pereira ◽  
Juliana Florinda de Mendonça Rego ◽  
Rodrigo Ramela Munhoz ◽  
Paulo Marcelo Hoff ◽  
Andre Deeke Sasse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis Group In Cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Bolus Administration ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

PURPOSE The administration of fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous intravenous infusion (CI) is an alternative to the bolus administration of 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Although more than 1,200 patients have been enrolled onto randomized trials that compared these two treatment modalities, there is still no definitive evidence of an advantage of 5-FU CI, and the magnitude of this advantage, if any, is also controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess this benefit in terms of tumor response and survival, and to compare the toxicity profiles of these two modalities of administration of 5-FU. DESIGN Individual data of 1,219 patients included in six randomized trials served as the basis for this meta-analysis, which was conducted by an independent secretariat in close collaboration with the investigators. RESULTS Tumor response rate was significantly higher in patients assigned to 5-FU CI than in patients assigned to 5-FU bolus (22% v 14%; overall response odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.41 to 0.75; P = .0002). Overall survival was also significantly higher in patients assigned to 5-FU CI (overall hazards ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.99; P = .04), although the median survival times were close. Multivariate analyses showed that randomized treatment and performance status were the only two significant predictors of tumor response, whereas the same plus primary tumor site were independent significant predictors of survival (patients with rectal cancer did somewhat better). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was more frequent in patients assigned to 5-FU bolus (31% v 4%; P < 10(-16)), whereas hand-foot syndrome was more frequent in the 5-FU CI group (34% v 13%; P < 10(-7)). CONCLUSION 5-FU CI is superior to 5-FU bolus in terms of tumor response and achieves a slight increase of overall survival. The hematologic toxicity is much less important in patients who receive 5-FU CI, but hand-foot syndrome is frequent in this group of patients.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Biologic Agents in the First Line Setting for Advanced Colorectal Cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e0140187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Kumachev ◽  
Marie Yan ◽  
Scott Berry ◽  
Yoo-Joung Ko ◽  
Maria C. R. Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biologic Agents ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Setting

FOLFOX-4 + cetuximab in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico dell’Italia Meridionale (prot. GOIM 2402)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3559-3559 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Colucci ◽  
F. Giuliani ◽  
R. Mattioli ◽  
C. Garufi ◽  
R. Mallamaci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
First Line ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Ecog Ps

3559 Background: Cetuximab is an IgG monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR showing to be effective both as single agent or in combination with Irinotecan (CPT-11) or Irinotecan/FU/FA in patients (pts) with EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in the first and second/subsequent-line setting. The current trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of Cetuximab plus Folfox-4 as first -line treatment. The main objective was the percentage of confirmed objective response rate. Methods: Chemonaivepts with non-resectable metastatic CRC and expressing EGFR were treated with Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 week 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter) plus Folfox-4 (every 2 weeks: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, day 1; FA 100 mg/m2 2h, simultaneously with OH-P, and FU 400 mg/m2 iv bolus followed by 600 mg/m2 iv for 22h on days 1 and 2). The first evaluation of disease status (Recist criteria) was performed after the first 4 cycles and confirmed after one month. The treatment was continued until a maximum of 12 cycles of chemotherapy; the maintenaice with Cetuximab was permitted. Preliminary results: On the 65 screened pts, 47 (72%) had EGFR-expressing metastatic disease and were enrolled. Their main characteristics were: median Ecog PS 0; median age 66 yrs (range 43–74); main sites of disease: liver 31, lung 12, lymph-nodes 3, others 8. To date twenty-two pts are evaluable for activity and 27 for toxicity; 2 pts are not evaluable and 25 are too early. We observed 16 PR (72.7%), 5 NC (22.7%) and 1 PD (4.6%) for an ORR of 72.7% and a TGCR of 95.4%; the confirmed PR were 15 (68%). To date 2 pts undergone surgery of their metastases both for lung. The main adverse events grade 3/4 (NCI criteria) were: acne-like rush 18.5%, diarrea 7%, nausea/vomiting 4% and anemia 4%. Conclusions: Our preliminary results confirm that the combination of Cetuximab plus Folfox-4 has an high activity and a good safety profile in advanced CRC pts. The study is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A retrospective study of first-line combination chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: A Korean single-center experience.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 623-623
Author(s):  
S. Lee ◽  
J. Park ◽  
S. Park ◽  
W. Kang ◽  
H. Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

623 Background: Fluoropyrimidine-based combination chemotherapy, in combination with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan, have demonstrated efficacy and tolerability against advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Methods: Between Jan 2006 and Dec 2007, 478 ACC patients were treated with combination chemotherapy in first-line setting: 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX, n=172), 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI, n=95), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX, n=155), and capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI, n=56). FOLFOX and FOLFIRI were repeated every 2 weeks, whereas XELOX and XELIRI were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred or until a patient chose to discontinue treatment. Results: The median age was 58 years (range, 19-84 years) and the median chemotherapy duration for FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, XELOX and XELIRI were 4.9, 4.5, 5.7 and 5.4 months, respectively. Combination chemotherapy regimens were generally well tolerated. The estimated median PFS for all patients was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval, 6.3-7.3 months). No statistically significant difference in PFS was found each regimen used as first-line chemotherapy. Sixty-percent (n=290) of patients received second or further lines of therapy after failure. Conclusions: Fluoropyrimidine-based combination chemotherapy regimens appear to be equally active and tolerable as first-line therapy for ACC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Correlation between overall survival and other efficacy endpoints in advanced biliary tract cancer: Literature-based analysis from 13 randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 352-352
Author(s):  
Toshikazu Moriwaki ◽  
Shinji Endo ◽  
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Takeshi Yamada ◽  
Akinori Sugaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Biliary Tract Neoplasms ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

352 Background: Chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC) has progressed. Now gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination is considered the standard 1st-line treatment based on the results of many randomized studies. However, the impact of various efficacy parameters on overall survival (OS) remains unclear. Methods: We searched PubMed database with the key words of (“biliary tract neoplasms” or “bile duct neoplasms” or “gallbladder neoplasms” or “cholangiocarcinoma” [All fields]) AND (“chemotherapy”[All fields]) AND Clinical trial [ptyp] between Apr 1984 to Jun 2013 and abstracts presented at the meetings of ASCO/Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (2004–2013) and ESMO/WCGC (2002–2013). Then we identified randomized trials of 1st-line chemotherapy for ABC, and analyzed the relations between the results of OS and those of progression-free survival (PFS) or time to progression (TTP), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), post-progression survival (PPS = median OS − median PFS/TTP), and the proportion of patients who received 2nd-line chemotherapy (%2nd). Results: Among 329 papers/abstracts retrieved, 13 randomized trials, 26 treatment arms of first-line chemotherapy for ABC were identified. Number of trials with information on median OS, median PFS/TTP, hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS/TTP, RR, DCR, and %2nd were 13, 13, 6, 13, 12, and 7, respectively. The analysis of all these trials demonstrated the median values (range) of OS, PFS/TTP, HR of OS, HR of PFS/TTP, RR, DCR, PPS, and %2nd were 9.4 (4.6–13) months, 5.3 (2.7–8.5) months, 0.71 (0.39–0.93), 0.65 (0.44–0.85), 20 (7.1–36) %, 67 (21–87) %, 4.0 (1.0–7.6) months, and 41 (15–79) %, respectively. Spearman rank correlation coefficient of differences (Δ) OS with ΔPFS/TTP, ΔRR, ΔDCR, and ΔPPS were 0.66, − 0.07, 0.66, and 0.34, respectively. The correlation coefficient between HRs for PFS/TTP and OS was 0.60. The correlation coefficient between ΔPPS and Δ%2nd was − 0.15. Conclusions: OS was moderately associated with PFS/TTP and DCR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document