A Phase I Study of Arsenic Trioxide (Trisenox), Ascorbic Acid, and Bortezomib (Velcade) Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren A. Held ◽  
David Rizzieri ◽  
Gwynn D. Long ◽  
Jon P. Gockerman ◽  
Louis F. Diehl ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1762-1768 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
Regina A. Swift ◽  
Russell Mapes ◽  
Blake Morrison ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5129-5129
Author(s):  
Lauren Held ◽  
Jon P. Gockerman ◽  
Louis F. Diehl ◽  
Carlos Manuel de Castro ◽  
Joseph O. Moore ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5129 Purpose: Bortezomib is a well recognized standard therapy, however it is not curative for multiple myeloma. New agents and approaches are needed to overcome resistance in multiple myeloma. Arsenic trioxde (ATO) induces apoptosis of plasma cells through a number of mechanisms, including down regulation of gene overexpression, activating cell cycle arrest by inducing p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor protein, and by triggering apoptosis through caspase-3 in a dose dependent manner. This phase I study assessed the feasibility and tolerability of concomitant administration of arsenic trioxide (ATO), ascorbic acid (AA), and bortezomib (VelcadeÔ) (AAV) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Experimental Design: A standard dose of ATO (0.25 mg/kg IV infused over 1–2 hours) and AA (1g IV infused over 15 minutes after infusion of ATO) were given once weekly × 2 with an escalating dose of bortezomib (cohort 1: 1 mg/m2 or cohort 2: 1.3 mg/m2 IV bolus on days 1, 8) of a 21 day cycle). ATO was given at least 1 hour prior to bortezomib and patients were allowed up to a maximum of 6–8 cycles. Results: A total of ten patients (median age, 62 years old) were enrolled with a median follow up of survivors of 25 months. Patients had an average of 4 prior failed therapies. Seven (70%) patients were refractory to bortezomib when previously administered. Despite our patient population being heavily pre-treated, objective responses were observed, with one partial response (Cohort 2), two minimal response (Cohort 1 and 2), and one stable disease (Cohort 2). To date, three of the 10 patients are continuing maintenance therapy 13–43 months from initiating this study. Conclusion: Of the patients that completed the treatment, objective responses were observed despite suboptimal dosing and previous bortezomib treatment failure. Tolerability was observed in most patients as discontinuation was not due to treatment toxicities, but due to aggressiveness of disease. Further studies are warranted with a larger patient population to effectively determine the effectiveness of AAV in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Rizzieri: Cephalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Long:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2565-2565 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Berenson ◽  
Jeff Matous ◽  
Delina Ferretti ◽  
Regina Swift ◽  
Russell Mapes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Both arsenic trioxide and bortezomib as single agents have shown efficacy for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Recently, we have demonstrated synergistic anti-MM effects when these two agents are combined to treat human MM in SCID mice and evaluated in in vitro studies. In addition, we and others have also shown that the addition of ascorbic acid (AA) sensitizes MM cells to the cytotoxic effects of arsenic trioxide both through in vitro and in vivo studies. Thus, the objective of the current Phase I clinical trial was to assess the safety and tolerability of bortezomib + arsenic trioxide + AA treatment for patients with refractory/relapsed MM. Methods: A treatment cycle comprised of intravenous injections of arsenic trioxide, bortezomib and AA on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 followed by a 10-day rest period every three weeks. Bortezomib was given at one of three dose levels (0.7, 1.0, or 1.3 mg/m2), followed by arsenic trioxide at one of two doses (0.125 or 0.25 mg/kg) intravenously followed by AA (1000 mg). Patients were treated for a maximum of eight cycles and were eligible for maintenance therapy with the same treatments given once every other week. Results: Eighteen patients have been enrolled to date, with three patients enrolled in each of the six cohorts. Patients had received a median of three prior therapies (range, 1–6), and five patients had received prior bortezomib therapy. Fifteen patients are evaluable for efficacy to date, and response data are summarized in Table 1. Overall, among the 15 evaluable patients, seven patients responded (2 PR, 5 MR), three patients showed stable disease, and five patients progressed. Among the six patients (in cohorts 1 and 4) enrolled at the lowest (0.7 mg/m2) bortezomib dose level, only one achieved a MR whereas among the nine evaluable patients enrolled at the higher (1.0 and 1.3 mg/m2) bortezomib dose levels six patients responded (2 PR, 4 MR). In general, the regimen was well tolerated. One patient in cohort 3 was removed from study during the first cycle because of the development of an asymptomatic arrhythmia which resolved spontaneously. Other serious adverse events included pneumonia in two patients, chest pain, and abdominal pain (one patient each). Conclusion: These early results from this Phase I/II study indicate that the combination of bortezomib, arsenic trioxide and ascorbic acid has efficacy and is well tolerated in a heavily pretreated population of patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Because of these encouraging clinical results, we plan to further evaluate this combination in a larger group of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Table 1. Dose escalation scheme Cohorts Arsenic trioxide Bortezomib No. of evaluable pts Response *one patient in cohort 3 went off study during cycle 1 (see above), and the other two patients (one each in cohorts 3 and 6) are too early for response evaluation Cohort 1 0.125 mg/kg 0.7 mg/m2 3 1 MR, 2 PD Cohort 2 0.125 mg/kg 1.0 mg/m2 3 1 PR, 1 SD, 1 PD Cohort 3 0.125 mg/kg 1.3 mg/m2 1* 1 PR Cohort 4 0.25 mg/kg 0.7 mg/m2 3 1 SD, 2 PD Cohort 5 0.25 mg/kg 1.0 mg/m2 3 3 MR Cohort 6 0.25 mg/kg 1.3 mg/m2 2* 1 SD, 1 MR


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1069-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Ori Yellin ◽  
Ravi Patel ◽  
Herb Duvivier ◽  
Youram Nassir ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 732-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Peter Lee ◽  
Steven T. Rosen ◽  
...  

Purpose Carfilzomib is an irreversible inhibitor of the constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome. This phase I study evaluated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of carfilzomib administered as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion. Safety and efficacy of carfilzomib as a single agent or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone were assessed. Patients and Methods Patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were administered single-agent carfilzomib on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. Cycle one day 1 and 2 doses were 20 mg/m2, followed thereafter by dose escalation to 36, 45, 56, or 70 mg/m2. Additionally, carfilzomib was combined with low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/wk). Results Thirty-three patients were treated with single-agent carfilzomib. Dose-limiting toxicities in two patients at 70 mg/m2 were renal tubular necrosis and proteinuria (both grade 3). The MTD was 56 mg/m2. Nausea (51.5%), fatigue (51.5%), pyrexia (42.4%), and dyspnea and thrombocytopenia (each 39.4%) were the most common treatment-related toxicities. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50% (56-mg/m2 cohort). Increasing carfilzomib dosing from 20 to 56 mg/m2 resulted in higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last sampling and maximum plasma concentration exposure with short half-life (range, 0.837 to 1.21 hours) and dose-dependent inhibition of proteasome chymotrypsin-like activity. In 22 patients treated with 45 or 56 mg/m2 of carfilzomib plus low-dose dexamethasone, the ORR was 55% with a safety profile comparable to that of single-agent carfilzomib. Conclusion Carfilzomib administered as a 30-minute IV infusion at 56 mg/m2 (as single agent or with low-dose dexamethasone) was generally well tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. These data have provided the basis for the phase III randomized, multicenter trial ENDEAVOR.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 2346-2353 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Jennifer To ◽  
Tanya M. Spektor ◽  
Daisy Martinez ◽  
Carley Turner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document