The Behavioural Response to the 5-hydroxytryptamine1B, (5HT1B) Receptor Agonist—Ru-24969 May Exhibit a Orcadian Variation in the Mouse

1987 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith F. Martin ◽  
Andrew R. Webb ◽  
Charles A. Marsden
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Dane Aronsen

<p>Rationale: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a less efficacious reinforcer than other drugs of abuse. However, following repeated self-administration, responding increases for some animals and efficacy becomes comparable to other drugs of abuse. MDMA-stimulated serotonin (5-HT) release was negatively associated with acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and a neurotoxic 5-HT lesion reduced the latency to acquire self-administration. These findings suggest that MDMA-produced 5-HT release is an important component of self-administration. The receptor mechanisms are not, however, well understood, although it has often been suggested that the mechanism involves 5-HT-mediated inhibition of dopamine. Both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors are well localised to regulate dopamine release, and both have been implicated in modulating the reinforcing effects of many drugs of abuse.   Objectives: The first objective was to establish specific behavioural assays to reflect 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation. Then, using the established behavioural assays, the aim was to determine the role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. The impact of substantial MDMA self-administration on 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors was also assessed.  Methods: Firstly, dose-effect relationships for the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) and the hyperactive and adipsic response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969 (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) were determined. Selectivity of these responses was determined by co-administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, or the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR 127935. Secondly, a pretreatment regimen of the RU 24969 (2 × 3.0 mg/kg/day, 3 days), which had been suggested to down-regulate 5-HT1B/1A receptors, was administered prior to self-administration testing. The effect of this manipulation on both the acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and the behavioural responses to 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation, was measured. A further study measured behavioural responses to 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor agonists prior to self-administration, to determine whether the variability in these responses would predict the variability in the latency to acquisition of MDMA self-administration. Lastly, the effect of substantial MDMA self-administration (350 mg/kg) on dose-response curves for the behavioural effects of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor activation was assessed.   Results: The hyperactive response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969, was blocked by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, but not the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist, GR127935. Similarly, the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, was dose-dependently blocked by WAY 100635. GR 127935, but not WAY 100635, blocked the adipsic response to RU 24969. Repeated administration of RU 24969 produced rightward shifts in the dose-response curves for 8-OH-DPAT-produced hyperactivity and RU 24969-produced adipsia, and also greatly facilitated the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. However, there was no correlation between latency to acquire MDMA self-administration and the hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT or the adipsic response to RU 24969, and MDMA self-administration failed to alter these behavioural response to activation of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors.   Conclusions: The hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT and the adipsic response to RU 24969 reflect activation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, respectively. The variability in acquisition of MDMA self-administration was reduced by a treatment that also down-regulated 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, however there was no further indication that these receptors play a critical role in the self-administration of MDMA. Instead, it seems likely that other 5-HT receptors have a greater impact on MDMA self-administration.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Dane Aronsen

<p>Rationale: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a less efficacious reinforcer than other drugs of abuse. However, following repeated self-administration, responding increases for some animals and efficacy becomes comparable to other drugs of abuse. MDMA-stimulated serotonin (5-HT) release was negatively associated with acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and a neurotoxic 5-HT lesion reduced the latency to acquire self-administration. These findings suggest that MDMA-produced 5-HT release is an important component of self-administration. The receptor mechanisms are not, however, well understood, although it has often been suggested that the mechanism involves 5-HT-mediated inhibition of dopamine. Both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors are well localised to regulate dopamine release, and both have been implicated in modulating the reinforcing effects of many drugs of abuse.   Objectives: The first objective was to establish specific behavioural assays to reflect 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation. Then, using the established behavioural assays, the aim was to determine the role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. The impact of substantial MDMA self-administration on 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors was also assessed.  Methods: Firstly, dose-effect relationships for the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) and the hyperactive and adipsic response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969 (0 – 3.0 mg/kg) were determined. Selectivity of these responses was determined by co-administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, or the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR 127935. Secondly, a pretreatment regimen of the RU 24969 (2 × 3.0 mg/kg/day, 3 days), which had been suggested to down-regulate 5-HT1B/1A receptors, was administered prior to self-administration testing. The effect of this manipulation on both the acquisition of MDMA self-administration, and the behavioural responses to 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor activation, was measured. A further study measured behavioural responses to 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor agonists prior to self-administration, to determine whether the variability in these responses would predict the variability in the latency to acquisition of MDMA self-administration. Lastly, the effect of substantial MDMA self-administration (350 mg/kg) on dose-response curves for the behavioural effects of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptor activation was assessed.   Results: The hyperactive response to the 5-HT1B/1A receptor agonist, RU 24969, was blocked by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, but not the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist, GR127935. Similarly, the hyperactive response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, was dose-dependently blocked by WAY 100635. GR 127935, but not WAY 100635, blocked the adipsic response to RU 24969. Repeated administration of RU 24969 produced rightward shifts in the dose-response curves for 8-OH-DPAT-produced hyperactivity and RU 24969-produced adipsia, and also greatly facilitated the acquisition of MDMA self-administration. However, there was no correlation between latency to acquire MDMA self-administration and the hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT or the adipsic response to RU 24969, and MDMA self-administration failed to alter these behavioural response to activation of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors.   Conclusions: The hyperactive response to 8-OH-DPAT and the adipsic response to RU 24969 reflect activation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, respectively. The variability in acquisition of MDMA self-administration was reduced by a treatment that also down-regulated 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors, however there was no further indication that these receptors play a critical role in the self-administration of MDMA. Instead, it seems likely that other 5-HT receptors have a greater impact on MDMA self-administration.</p>


1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (5) ◽  
pp. R1231-R1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bovetto ◽  
C. Rouillard ◽  
D. Richard

Two series of experiments were conducted to investigate the role of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) on energy intake and energy expenditure. The first set of experiments was carried out to confirm the influence of 5-HT1A-, 5-HT1B-, 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonists on the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Plasma corticosterone levels were measured, and a double-immunolabeling procedure was used to determine whether the neuronal activity marker, c-Fos protein (Fos), could be found within brain neurons containing CRH after treatments with 5-HT1A-, 5-HT1B-, 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonists. The second series of experiments was conducted to assess the involvement of CRH in the effects of 5-HT on food intake and metabolic rate (VO2). The effects of the 5-HT1A-, 5-HT1B-, 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonists on food intake and VO2 were measured in rats treated with the CRH antagonist, alpha-helical CRH-(9-41). In both experiments rats were intraperitoneally injected with either a vehicle (NaCl 0.9%), the 5-HT1A-receptor agonist (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), the 5-HT1B-receptor agonist 5-methoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridinyl)-1H-indole succinate (RU-24969), or the 5-HT2A/2C-receptor agonist (+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl (DOI). Fos immunoreactivity was detectable within the CRH-containing neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVH) after injection of each of the 5-HT-receptor agonists used. The CRH antagonist alpha-helical CRH-(9-41) attenuated the increases in metabolic rate induced by DOI and 8-OH-DPAT. alpha-Helical CRH did not, however, prevent the effects of RU-24969 and DOI on either nocturnal metabolic rate or food intake. The present results provide further evidence for a role of CRH in 5-HT-mediated thermogenic effect, which likely involves the 5-HT2A/2C receptor during the day and the 5-HT1A receptor during the night. Moreover, these results do not support a role for CRH in 5-HT anorectic effects, which likely involves 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A/2C receptors. Finally, the results of this study indicate that the stimulation of CRH-containing neurons located in the PVH does not necessarily predict changes in food intake and energy expenditure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document