The role of genetic and autoimmune factors in poor ovarian response in IVF programs

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 65-68
Author(s):  
Nataliya V. Dolgushina ◽  
Rosa E. Vanyan ◽  
Maria V. Kuznetsova ◽  
Irina V. Menzhinskaya ◽  
Vera V. Kazakova ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Bai ◽  
Huihui Pan ◽  
Yinjun Zhao ◽  
Qingqing Chen ◽  
Yu Xiang ◽  
...  

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is the most common therapeutic protocol to obtain a considerable number of oocytes in IVF-ET cycles. To date, the risk factors affecting COH outcomes remain elusive. Growth differentiation factor 8 (GDF-8), a member of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily, has been long discerned as a crucial growth factor in folliculogenesis, and the aberrant expression of GDF-8 is closely correlated with the reproductive diseases. However, less is known about the level of GDF-8 in IVF-ET patients with different ovarian response. In the present study, the potential risk factors correlated with ovarian response were explored using logistic regression analysis methods. Meanwhile, the expression changes of GDF-8 and its responsible cellular receptors in various ovarian response patients were determined. Our results showed that several factors were intensely related to poor ovarian response (POR), including aging, obesity, endometriosis, surgery history, and IVF treatment, while irregular menstrual cycles and PCOS contribute to hyperovarian response (HOR). Furthermore, POR patients exhibited a decrease in numbers of MII oocytes and available embryos, thereby manifesting a lower clinical pregnancy rate. The levels of GDF-8, ALK5, and ACVR2B in POR patients were higher compared with those in control groups, whereas the expression level of ACVR2A decreased in poor ovarian response patients. In addition, clinical correlation analysis results showed that the concentration of GDF-8 was negatively correlated with LH and estradiol concentration and antral follicle count. Collectively, our observations provide a novel insight of ovarian response–associated risk factors, highlighting the potential role of GDF-8 levels in ovarian response during COH process.


2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1659-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek M. K. Motawi ◽  
Sherine M. Rizk ◽  
Nadine W. Maurice ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Maged ◽  
Ayman N. Raslan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Menelaos Tzafetas ◽  
Konstantinos Lathouras ◽  
Theocharis Tantanasis ◽  
Styliani Fidani ◽  
Konstantinos Tziomalos ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Aim To study the role of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP- 1,2,3), inhibitor tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2, and specific gene polymorphisms in unexpected poor ovarian responders (un-PORs). Materials and methods Group I consisted of 44 un-PORs, group II of 42 subfertile, normal ovarian responders (NORs), and group III of 66 fertile women in a prospective study. Matrix metalloproteinase-1,2,3 and TIMP-2 were assessed in 40 patients from groups I and II. Specific polymorphisms (SP; MMP-1 −519 A/G, MMP-2 −1575 G/A, MMP-3 −1171 5A/6A, and TIMP-2 rs55743137T/G) were investigated in group I, II, and III patients. Results Group I required similar amount of gonadotropins compared with group II, with fewer oocytes retrieved, lower fertilization rates, embryos/embryo transfer, clinical pregnancies/cycle, and “take-home babies” (p = 0.900, 0.001, 0.002, 0.001, 0.031, and p = 0.128) respectively, Table 1). Group I had lower MMP-2 with higher TIMP-2 (p = 0.002, 0.037 respectively; Table 2). In the same group, MMP-1 was higher in women with GG genotype of the MMP-1 polymorphism, vs GA genotype (p = 0.047; Table 3). The MMP-2, MMP-3, and TIMP-2 polymorphisms did not affect MMP-2, MMP-3, and TIMP-2 respectively. The same applied for MMP-1,2,3 and TIMP-2 in group II. Comparing frequencies of different genotypes of the MMP-1,2,3 and TIMP-2 polymorphisms, they did not differ between the three different groups: A, B, and C (Table 4). Conclusion Impaired MMP-2 activity, associated with significantly higher TIMP-2 detected, could be involved in un-POR pathogenesis. There was no strong association between MMP polymorphisms and un-POR susceptibility. However, women with A/G polymorphism (MMP-1 −519) had lower MMP-1 compared with GG homozygotes. Clinical significance Identification of patients with poor ovarian response in a pretreatment environment would help improve their ongoing fertility plan and manage their expectations. Also by having the ability to investigate if one belongs to that group, it could provide important family planning information for the patient. How to cite this article Tzafetas M, Lathouras K, Tantanasis T, Fidani S, Tziomalos K, Kalinderi K, Loufopoulos A, Zournatzi V. Role of Metalloproteinases in the Pathogenesis of Unexpected Poor Ovarian Response with a Possible Genetic Predisposition. Int J Infertil Fetal Med 2017;8(1):5-11.


GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
R.E. Vanyan ◽  
◽  
N.V. Dolgushina ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Zhang ◽  
Ting Feng ◽  
Jihong Yang ◽  
Yingying Hao ◽  
Suying Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ovarian responsiveness to controlled ovarian stimulation is essential for a successful clinical outcome in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. We aimed to find a suitable new ovulation stimulation protocol for poor ovarian response (POR) patients over 40 years old. Methods A retrospective analysis of 488 ART cycles was evaluated from January 2015 to June 2019. Comparisons were made between the flexible short protocol (FSP), routine short protocol and mild stimulation protocol. Results Compared with the routine short protocol, the FSP delayed the gonadotropin start time and reduced the total gonadotropin dose per stimulation cycle. At the same time, compared with the mild stimulation protocol, the FSP improved oocyte quality and embryo quality and improved embryo implantation potential after transfer. Furthermore, the use of the FSP reduced the probability of premature ovulation, as it inhibited the premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge to a certain extent. Conclusions The FSP yielded better outcomes than other protocols for patients with POR over 40 years old in our study. However, further prospective studies are needed to provide more substantial evidence and to determine whether the FSP can be successful for both patients over 40 years group and younger POR patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document