Relationships Between Cervical Range of Motion, Self-Rated Disability and Fear of Movement Beliefs in Chronic Neck Pain Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily R. Howell ◽  
Karen Hudes ◽  
Howard Vernon ◽  
David Soave
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Weigl ◽  
Josefine Letzel ◽  
Felix Angst

Abstract Background: Recent clinical studies support the effectiveness of chronic neck pain specific multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programmes, but prognostic factors for improvement in pain and disability are unknown. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of improvement in patients with chronic neck pain after participation in a three-week multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme. Methods: In this observational prospective cohort study patients were assessed at the beginning and the end of a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme. Inclusion for participation in the rehabilitation programme depended upon an interdisciplinary pain assessment. Consecutive patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the study. A total of 112 patients participated. The primary outcomes, pain and disability, were measured by the Northern American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS), quantified by effect sizes (ES), and modelled with various co-factors. Secondary outcomes were mental health measured by the Short-Form 36 and total cervical active range of motion measured by a reliable, validated cervical range of motion instrument.Results: Patients’ mean age was 59.7 years (standard deviation=10.8); 70.5% were female. Patients improved significantly (p<0.001) in pain+disability (ES=0.56), mental health (ES=0.45) and cervical range of motion (ES=0.39). Prognostic factors for improvement in pain+disability were worse baseline scores (partial, adjusted correlation r=0.41, p<0.001), higher age (r=0.22, p=0.024), higher improvement in cervical range of motion (r=0.21, p=0.033) and higher improvement in mental health scale (r=0.20; p=0.047). Conclusions: Better outcomes for patients with improvement in neck range of motion, improvement of mental health, and higher age support the use of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation that combines physical and psychological treatment components. Furthermore, the results suggest that older patients may improve more compared to younger patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-143
Author(s):  
Jose Vicente León-Hernández ◽  
David Marcos-Lorenzo ◽  
David Morales-Tejera ◽  
Ferran Cuenca-Martínez ◽  
Roy La Touche ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0170274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Rudolfsson ◽  
Martin Björklund ◽  
Åsa Svedmark ◽  
Divya Srinivasan ◽  
Mats Djupsjöbacka

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Rohe ◽  
Ronald Carter ◽  
William R. Thompson ◽  
Randall L. Duncan ◽  
Carlton R. Cooper

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1522-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max Daniel Kauther ◽  
Michael Piotrowski ◽  
Bjoern Hussmann ◽  
Sven Lendemans ◽  
Christian Wedemeyer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Verónica Pérez-Cabezas ◽  
Carmen Ruiz-Molinero ◽  
Jose Jesús Jimenez-Rejano ◽  
Gema Chamorro-Moriana ◽  
Gloria Gonzalez-Medina ◽  
...  

Objectives. Proprioceptive training is popularly applied as a therapeutic exercise method in physiotherapy. Its effects on pain and range of motion are only poorly evaluated. Therefore, this study assesses the effectiveness of proprioceptive training with an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program to decrease pain and increase the joint range in chronic neck pain patients. Material and Methods. Design. A randomized, no-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Setting. Physiotherapy consultation. Participants. 44 people were divided into two groups. Interventions. All patients were treated with a multimodal physiotherapy intervention. The experimental group was supplemented with an exercise program that included eye-cervical proprioception. Outcomes. The primary outcomes included pain pressure thresholds (upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and splenius capitis) and cervical range of motion. The secondary outcomes included pain measured by the Visual Analogical Scale and the McGillSpv Questionnaire. Results. The proprioception treatment was effective in reducing the pain pressure threshold in the right upper trapezius (p=0.001), left upper trapezius (p=0.014), right levator scapula (p=0.040), and left splenius capitis (p=0.021). The increase in the joint range was statistically significant (p<0.05) in favor of the Eye-Cervical Re-education Program for all movements assessed. Conclusions. The Eye-Cervical Re-education Program is effective at relieving pain pressure thresholds in the upper trapezius, right levator scapula, and left splenius capitis and especially effective for increasing the cervical range of motion. This trial is registered with NCT03197285 (retrospective registration).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document