scholarly journals Capacity Building in Global Mental Health Research

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Thornicroft ◽  
Sara Cooper ◽  
Tine Van Bortel ◽  
Ritsuko Kakuma ◽  
Crick Lund
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Yang ◽  
C. Pratt ◽  
E. Valencia ◽  
S. Conover ◽  
R. Fernández ◽  
...  

The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and initial accomplishments of a training program of young leaders in community mental health research as part of a Latin American initiative known as RedeAmericas. RedeAmericas was one of five regional ‘Hubs’ funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) to improve community mental health care and build mental health research capacity in low- and middle-income countries. It included investigators in six Latin American cities – Santiago, Chile; Medellín, Colombia; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and Córdoba, Neuquén, and Buenos Aires in Argentina – working together with a team affiliated with the Global Mental Health program at Columbia University in New York City. One component of RedeAmericas was a capacity-building effort that included an Awardee program for early career researchers in the mental health field. We review the aims of this component, how it developed, and what was learned that would be useful for future capacity-building efforts, and also comment on future prospects for maintaining this type of effort.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schneider ◽  
K. Sorsdahl ◽  
R. Mayston ◽  
J. Ahrens ◽  
D. Chibanda ◽  
...  

BackgroundThere remains a large disparity in the quantity, quality and impact of mental health research carried out in sub-Saharan Africa, relative to both the burden and the amount of research carried out in other regions. We lack evidence on the capacity-building activities that are effective in achieving desired aims and appropriate methodologies for evaluating success.MethodsAFFIRM was an NIMH-funded hub project including a capacity-building program with three components open to participants across six countries: (a) fellowships for an M.Phil. program; (b) funding for Ph.D. students conducting research nested within AFFIRM trials; (c) short courses in specialist research skills. We present findings on progression and outputs from the M.Phil. and Ph.D. programs, self-perceived impact of short courses, qualitative data on student experience, and reflections on experiences and lessons learnt from AFFIRM consortium members.ResultsAFFIRM delivered funded research training opportunities to 25 mental health professionals, 90 researchers and five Ph.D. students across 6 countries over a period of 5 years. A number of challenges were identified and suggestions for improving the capacity-building activities explored.ConclusionsHaving protected time for research is a barrier to carrying out research activities for busy clinicians. Funders could support sustainability of capacity-building initiatives through funds for travel and study leave. Adoption of a train-the-trainers model for specialist skills training and strategies for improving the rigor of evaluation of capacity-building activities should be considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 612-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria A Oquendo ◽  
Cristiane Duarte ◽  
Lidia Gouveia ◽  
Jair J Mari ◽  
Marcelo F Mello ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Breuer ◽  
Charlotte Hanlon ◽  
Arvin Bhana ◽  
Dan Chisholm ◽  
Mary De Silva ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document