Experience with an Anonymous Web-Based State EMS Safety Incident Reporting System

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Gallagher ◽  
Douglas F. Kupas
2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Gibbs ◽  
M. Culwick ◽  
A. F. Merry

webAIRS is a web-based de-identified anaesthesia incident reporting system, which was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in September 2009. By July 2016, 4,000 incident reports had been received. The incidents covered a wide range of patient age (<28 days to >90 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and body mass index (<18.5 to >50 kg/m2). They occurred across a wide range of anaesthesia techniques and grade of anaesthesia provider, and over a wide range of anaesthetising locations and times of day. In a high proportion the outcome was not benign; about 26% of incidents were associated with patient harm and a further 4% with death. Incidents appeared to be an ever-present risk in anaesthetic practice, with extrapolated estimates exceeding 200 per week across Australia and New Zealand. Independent of outcomes, many anaesthesia incidents were associated with increased use of health resources. The four most common main categories of incident were Respiratory/Airway, Medication, Cardiovascular, and Medical Device/Equipment. Over 50% of incidents were considered preventable. The narratives accompanying each incident provide a rich source of information, which will be analysed in subsequent reports on particular incident types. The summary data in this initial overview are a sober reminder of the prevalence and unpredictability of anaesthesia incidents, and their potential morbidity and mortality. The data justify current efforts to better prevent and manage anaesthesia incidents in Australia and New Zealand, and identify areas in which increased resources or additional initiatives may be required.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2098262
Author(s):  
Matthew R Bright ◽  
Sandra I Concha Blamey ◽  
Linda A Beckmann ◽  
Martin D Culwick

Published reports of uvular necrosis are uncommon and it is possibly an under-reported complication of oropharyngeal manipulation. Uvular necrosis is thought to develop due to ischaemia secondary to mechanical compression of the uvula from oropharyngeal devices. Patients typically present with symptoms of a sore throat within 48 hours postoperatively. It is unclear whether there are any preventable factors, or any specific management strategies that might reduce this complication. Treatment is most commonly conservative management, including observation and simple analgesia. We present 13 cases of uvular injury that were reported to a web-based anaesthesia incident reporting system (webAIRS), a voluntary de-identified anaesthesia incident reporting system in Australia and New Zealand. While the postoperative findings varied, sore throat was the most frequent symptom. Most of the cases resolved spontaneously; the remainder with supportive treatment only. The findings suggest that patients who sustain a uvular injury can be reassured, but they should be advised to seek review early if sore throat persists or any difficulty with breathing develops.


Author(s):  
Sylvia Bae ◽  
Samone Khouangsathiene ◽  
Christopher Morey ◽  
Chris O'Connor ◽  
Eric Rose ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (41) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Gaukhar Alzhaxina ◽  
◽  
Gulnar Kurenkeyeva ◽  

The aim: To assess the risk identification system based on the incident report, the existing incident reporting system, and factors affecting the structure of incidents in the healthcare organization. Methods. Within the framework of this study, personnel were questioned on the knowledge and use of the incident reporting system related to the provision of medical treatment and care. To collect primary information, a questionnaire was developed, statistical processing of the research results was carried out by the method of calculating the relative risk (RR) using the Stat Tech program, on the website "Medical statistics". Results. All employees (100%) are aware of the incident reporting system. Personnel were more likely to use the incident reporting system as a way to deal with business and organizational issues. The knowledge of events that must be reported were rated equally by the doctors and the nurse (70%; RR - 1.0; C1 0.83 - 1.19). The nurse was more afraid of criticism than doctors (56% versus 66%; RR - 1.18; CI 95%; C1 0.94 - 1.47). Doctors rated the priority of filling out a report lower than a nurse (52% versus 58%; RR - 0.89; CI 95%; C1 0.69 - 1.15). The value and convenience of filling out the report were assessed by the doctors and the nurse equally (64%; RR - 1.0; CI 95%; C1 0.82 - 1.23). Conclusion. Medical personnel have a positive view of the incident reporting system, however, lack of knowledge of specific reported events, poor safety culture, and lack of feedback are the main factors hindering the effectiveness of the system. Developing a list of specific health care events to be reported will enhance the effectiveness of incident reporting as a risk management tool. Keywords: healthcare system, risk management, patient safety, incident, incident report.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document