scholarly journals Trapezius transfer for shoulder paralysis: 6 patients with brachial plexus injuries followed for 1 year

1998 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Mir-Bullo ◽  
Pedro Hinarejos ◽  
Pedro Mir-Batlle ◽  
Rosa Busquets ◽  
Lluis Carrera ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ryan Potter ◽  
Stavros Thomopoulos

Neonatal brachial plexus injuries during childbirth can cause shoulder paralysis in 1 out of every 250 births in the United States.1,2 Although 80% of these infants recover spontaneously and have no residual complications, a number of them have persistent paralysis and functional deficits.1,3,4 Surgeons are thus faced with a choice on if and when to intervene. However, the time course of persistent paralysis leading to permanent functional defects in the neonate is unclear.


2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOHN A.I. GROSSMAN ◽  
PATRICIA DITARANTO ◽  
ILKER YAYLALI ◽  
ISRAEL ALFONSO ◽  
LORNA E. RAMOS ◽  
...  

Eleven children ranging in age from 9 to 21 months underwent late nerve reconstruction for persistent shoulder paralysis following an upper brachial plexus birth injury. Only neurolysis was performed in three patients. Neurolysis and nerve grafting bypassing the neuroma with proximal and distal end-to-side repairs was performed in the other eight. All patients were followed for 2 or more years. Two patients underwent a secondary procedure before their final follow-up evaluation. All infants demonstrated significant improvement when assessed by a modified Gilbert shoulder motion scale.


2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Ögce ◽  
H. Özyalçin

Two myoelectrically controlled battery powered shoulderelbow orthoses manufactured individually for two traumatic unilateral brachial plexus injury cases are reported. The first case was 24 years old and the other was 6 years old. Both patients had undergone unsuccessful microsurgical nerve repair procedures leaving them with elbow and shoulder paralysis and some residual hand motion. Manufactured orthoses were made of lightweight thermoplastic polyethylene. They stabilised the affected shoulder joint in the neutral position. Elbow extension and flexion were activated by a myoelectrically controlled battery powered orthosis, and the active range of motion of the elbow was between 60 and 140 degrees. These orthoses achieved elbow motions at a speed of 16 degrees per second. The rehabilitation time was 3 months in both patients. The older patient was rehabilitated using a 1kg mass, and the younger one with 0.5kg mass, throughout the full range of active elbow motions. After 21 months it was found, in both cases, that the orthotic treatment had been successful and that the patients had been given the ability to engage in twohanded activities of daily living.


1999 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 407-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Riihmann ◽  
Frank Gossé ◽  
Carl Joachim Wirth

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Jay Blaisdell

Abstract Physicians use a variety of methodologies within the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, to rate nerve injuries depending on the type of injury and location of the nerve. Traumatic injuries that cause impairment to the peripheral or brachial plexus nerves are rated using Section 15.4e, Peripheral Nerve and Brachial Plexus Impairment, for upper extremities and Section 16.4c, Peripheral Nerve Rating Process, for lower extremities. Verifiable nerve lesions that incite the symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome, type II (similar to the former concept of causalgia), also are rated in these sections. Nerve entrapments, which are not isolated traumatic events, are rated using the methodology in Section 15.4f, Entrapment Neuropathy. Type I complex regional pain syndrome is rated using Section 15.5, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome for upper extremities or Section 16.5, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome for lower extremities. The method for grading the sensory and motor deficits is analogous to the method described in previous editions of AMA Guides. Rating the permanent impairment of the peripheral nerves or brachial plexus is similar to the methodology used in the diagnosis-based impairment scheme with the exceptions that the physical examination grade modifier is never used to adjust the default rating and the names of individual nerves or plexus trunks, as opposed to the names of diagnoses, appear in the far left column of the rating grids.


1984 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Hanno Millesi
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Griffith ◽  
Radhesh Krishna Lalam

AbstractWhen it comes to examining the brachial plexus, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary investigations. US is well placed for screening most extraforaminal pathologies, whereas MRI is more sensitive and accurate for specific clinical indications. For example, MRI is probably the preferred technique for assessment of trauma because it enables a thorough evaluation of both the intraspinal and extraspinal elements, although US can depict extraforaminal neural injury with a high level of accuracy. Conversely, US is probably the preferred technique for examination of neurologic amyotrophy because a more extensive involvement beyond the brachial plexus is the norm, although MRI is more sensitive than US for evaluating muscle denervation associated with this entity. With this synergy in mind, this review highlights the tips for examining the brachial plexus with US and MRI.


2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
JAI Grossman ◽  
I Yaylali ◽  
LE Ramos ◽  
H Valencia ◽  
P Di Taranto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document