General Principles of Regulatory Toxicology Report Writing

1996 ◽  
pp. 27-40
Author(s):  
G Nohynek ◽  
A Lodola
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. Beriloff ◽  
Rosemary Flanagan

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Hamdy Hady ◽  
Henderi Henderi ◽  
Dian Mustika Putri

The management activity of research report writing requires sufficient knowledge in its preparation. A researcher must learn about the management of understanding scientific concepts, as well as management of research reports that are based on scientific truth. In this study, 1 (one) method was used, namely a literature study of 10 (ten) to support the understanding of scientific concepts according to experts. The concept is a general idea that represents perceived understanding on the basis of reason and logic by someone who then forms a meaning deductively or inductively. Whereas knowledge is what is known or the results of work know. Then scientific truth is related to the quality of knowledge, where every knowledge possessed is viewed from the type of knowledge that is built. Thus scientific truth is an important point in scientific reporting, as the basic foundation of accurate management of report writing and must be displayed in every corner of the report. It is hoped that this research can assist researchers in compiling research reports. Keywords: Management, Science, Scientific Truth, Research Reports.


1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice Chinn ◽  
Phyllis Bolds ◽  
David Banaszak ◽  
Robert Merkle
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 019262332098325
Author(s):  
Alys E. Bradley ◽  
Maurice G. Cary ◽  
Kaori Isobe ◽  
Stuart Naylor ◽  
Stephen Drew

This Proof of Concept (POC) study was to assess whether assessment of whole slide images (WSI) of the 2 target tissues for a contemporaneous peer review can elicit concordant results to the findings generated by the Study Pathologist from the glass slides. Well-focused WSI of liver and spleen from 4 groups of mice, that had previously been diagnosed to be the target tissues by an experienced veterinary toxicologic pathologist examining glass slides, were independently reviewed by 3 veterinary pathologists with varying experience in assessment of WSIs. Diagnostic discrepancies were then reviewed by an experienced adjudicating pathologist. Assessment of microscopic findings using WSI showed concordance with the glass slides, with only slight discrepancy in severity grades noted. None of the lesions recorded by the Study pathologist were “missed” and no lesions were added by the pathologists evaluating WSIs, thus demonstrating equivalence of the WSI to glass slides for this study.


1994 ◽  
Vol 60 (575) ◽  
pp. 2407-2414
Author(s):  
Takeshi Nakamoto ◽  
Katsumi Yamaguchi ◽  
Abraha Abbay ◽  
Yoshimoto Matsuda ◽  
Karyawan

1996 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-178
Author(s):  
Johannes J.M. van de Sandt ◽  
Victor J. Feron

With rapidly increasing knowledge of toxicological processes, the scientific value and relevance of toxicity studies for risk assessment must be re-evaluated. In this paper, it is proposed that the rigid risk evaluation currently required should be replaced by a more flexible, case-by-case approach, in order to increase the relevance of each animal test conducted. The development of new types of toxicity studies and their application in risk evaluation are also described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document