Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products

2002 ◽  
pp. 635-658
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Cosmetic Products

Amended Safety Assessment of Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Methylisothiazolinone as Used in Cosmetics

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20S-33S
Author(s):  
Christina L. Burnett ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
Daniel C. Liebler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Quantitative Risk Assessment ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Human Data

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) reassessed the safety of the mixture Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/Methylisothiazolinone (MI), which functions as a preservative in cosmetic products. The Panel reviewed relevant animal and human data provided in this safety assessment, and data from the previously published safety assessment of this mixture, and concluded that MCI/MI is safe in cosmetics when formulated to be nonsensitizing, based on the results of a quantitative risk assessment or similar methodology; however, at no point should concentrations exceed 7.5 ppm in leave-on products or 15 ppm in rinse-off products.

Amended Safety Assessment of Fatty Acyl Sarcosines and Sarcosinate Salts as Used in Cosmetics

2021 ◽  
pp. 109158182110238
Author(s):  
Monice M. Fiume ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Fatty Acyl ◽  
Nitroso Compounds ◽  
Acyl Residue ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Panel Report ◽  
Fatty Acyl Residue

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) assessed the safety of 5 acyl sarcosines and 9 sarcosinate salts as used in cosmetics; all of these ingredients are reported to function in cosmetics as hair conditioning agents and most also can function as surfactants—cleansing agents. The ingredients reviewed in this assessment are composed of an amide comprising a fatty acyl residue and sarcosine and are either free acids or simple salts thereof. The Panel relied on relevant new data, including concentration of use, and considered data from the previous Panel report, such as the reaction of sarcosine with oxidizing materials possibly resulting in nitrosation and the formation of N-nitrososarcosine. The Panel concluded that these ingredients are safe as used in cosmetics when formulated to be non-irritating, but these ingredients should not be used in cosmetic products in which N-nitroso compounds may be formed.

Safety Assessment of Citrus Peel-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics

2021 ◽  
pp. 109158182110326
Author(s):  
Christina L. Burnett ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Citrus Peel ◽  
Good Manufacturing Practices

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety (Panel) assessed the safety of 47 Citrus peel-derived ingredients, which are most frequently reported to function in cosmetics as skin conditioning agents. The Panel reviewed the available data to determine the safety of these ingredients. Because final product formulations may contain multiple botanical ingredients, each containing similar constituents of concern, formulators are advised to be aware of these constituents and to avoid reaching levels that may be hazardous to consumers. Industry should use good manufacturing practices to limit impurities that could be present in botanical ingredients. The Panel concluded that Citrus peel-derived ingredients are safe in the present practices of use and concentration in both rinse-off and leave-on cosmetic products when formulated to be non-sensitizing and non-irritating, provided that leave-on products do not contain more than 0.0015% (15 ppm) 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP).

1 Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Isostearyl Neopentanoate

1985 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Test Data ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Cosmetic Formulation

Isostearyl Neopentanoate, the ester of Isostearyl Alcohol and Neopentanoic Acid, is used in cosmetic products as an emollient at concentrations up to 50 percent. The undiluted ingredient at doses up to 4 ml/kg was shown to be relatively non-toxic in short-and long-term feeding studies. Test data from animal and clinical studies indicate the undiluted ingredient is neither an irritant nor a sensitizer. A cosmetic formulation containing 16 percent Isostearyl Neopentanoate produced no phototoxicity and no photoallergenicity. Mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and teratogenicity data were not available. Isostearyl Neopentanoate was not considered to be a significant comedogenic agent. On the basis of available data, it is concluded that this ingredient is safe as a cosmetic ingredient in its present practices of use.

Final Report of the Safety Assessment of Kojic Acid as Used in Cosmetics

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 244S-273S ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina L. Burnett ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
Curtis D. Klaassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Kojic Acid ◽  
Tumor Promotion ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Pig Skin ◽  
Animal Data ◽  
Skin Lightening

Kojic acid functions as an antioxidant in cosmetic products. Kojic acid was not a toxicant in acute, chronic, reproductive, and genotoxicity studies. While some animal data suggested tumor promotion and weak carcinogenicity, kojic acid is slowly absorbed into the circulation from human skin and likely would not reach the threshold at which these effects were seen. The available human sensitization data supported the safety of kojic acid at a use concentration of 2% in leave-on cosmetics. Kojic acid depigmented black guinea pig skin at a concentration of 4%, but this effect was not seen at 1%. The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel concluded that the 2 end points of concern, dermal sensitization and skin lightening, would not be seen at use concentrations below 1%; therefore, this ingredient is safe for use in cosmetic products up to that level.

Safety Assessment of Talc as Used in Cosmetics

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 66S-129S ◽  
Author(s):  
Monice M. Fiume ◽  
Ivan Boyer ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Data ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Epidermal Barrier ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel (Panel) assessed the safety of talc for use in cosmetics. The safety of talc has been the subject of much debate through the years, partly because the relationship between talc and asbestos is commonly misunderstood. Industry specifications state that cosmetic-grade talc must contain no detectable fibrous, asbestos minerals. Therefore, the large amount of available animal and clinical data the Panel relied on in assessing the safety of talc only included those studies on talc that did not contain asbestos. The Panel concluded that talc is safe for use in cosmetics in the present practices of use and concentration (some cosmetic products are entirely composed of talc). Talc should not be applied to the skin when the epidermal barrier is missing or significantly disrupted.

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Aldioxa

1993 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-242
Keyword(s):  
Organic Compound ◽  
Guinea Pigs ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Feeding Study ◽  
Human Volunteers

Aldioxa is a heterocyclic organic compound used in cosmetic products as an astringent and skin conditioning agent. The oral LD50 for mice exceeds 23 mg/kg, and 8 g/kg for rats. All of the toxicologic parameters investigated in a 94-day subchronic feeding study in rats were similar in the test and the control group. No significant macroscopic adverse results were obtained in a three generation study in which rats were fed diets containing 10% Aldioxa. A suspension containing 25% Aldioxa was not a sensitizer when applied to the shaved backs of 3 male guinea pigs, nor when 10 animals were given intradermal injections of a 2% Aldioxa suspension on alternating days for a total of 10 applications and challenged after a 10-day nontreatment period. A hydrophilic unguent containing 4% Aldioxa was neither an irritant nor a sensitizer when evaluated on 200 human volunteers. The safety of Aldioxa has not been completely documented and substantiated. It cannot be concluded that this ingredient is safe for use in cosmetic products until the appropriate needed safety data cited in the report have been obtained and evaluated.

Safety Assessment of Alkyl PEG Sulfosuccinates as Used in Cosmetics

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70S-83S
Author(s):  
Wilbur Johnson ◽  
Bart Heldreth ◽  
Wilma F. Bergfeld ◽  
Donald V. Belsito ◽  
Ronald A. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Developmental Toxicity ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Molecular Size ◽  
Skin Sensitization ◽  
Toxicity Data ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Dermal Penetration ◽  
Repeated Dose Toxicity

The Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) Expert Panel (Panel) reviewed the safety of alkyl polyethylene glycol (PEG) sulfosuccinates, which function in cosmetics mostly as surfactants/cleansing agents. Although these ingredients may cause ocular and skin irritation, dermal penetration is unlikely because of the substantial polarity and molecular size of these ingredients. The Panel considered the negative oral carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity data on chemically related laureths (PEG lauryl ethers) and negative repeated dose toxicity and skin sensitization data on disodium laureth sulfosuccinate supported the safety of these alkyl PEG sulfosuccinates in cosmetic products, but. The CIR Expert Panel concluded that the alkyl PEG sulfosuccinates are safe in the present practices of use and concentration when formulated to be nonirritating.

Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Polyvinyl Acetate

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-473 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Polyvinyl Acetate ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Fibroblast Cell ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Ames Assay ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Chinese Hamster Fibroblast

Polyvinyl Acetate, as used in cosmetic products, is a latex emulsion known as the homopolymer of ethenyl acetate. It is used as a binder, emulsion stabilizer, and hair fixative at concentrations less than 25%. Polyvinyl Acetate was nonmutagenic in the Ames assay, with and without activation, and in the Chinese Hamster fibroblast cell assay. Carcinogenic implantation studies using mice gave negative results. It is concluded that the data available are insufficient to support the safety of Polyvinyl Acetate as currently used in cosmetic products. The types of data needed to complete the safety evaluation are listed in the report.

4: Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Toluene

1987 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-120 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Skin ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Cosmetic Products ◽  
Skin Exposure

Toluene has a wide variety of noncosmetic applications. However, the cosmetic use is limited to nail products at concentrations up to 50%. Toluene was practically nontoxic when given orally to rats; acute oral LD50 values ranged from 2.6 g/kg to 7.5 g/kg. Results of animal studies indicated that undiluted Toluene is a skin irritant. No skin irritation or sensitization was observed in subjects treated with cosmetic products containing 31-33% Toluene. No phototoxic or photoallergic reactions were noted in subjects treated with 25% or 30% Toluene. The sole cosmetic use of Toluene is in products intended to be applied directly to the nail; therefore, human skin exposure to this ingredient will be minimal under conditions of cosmetic use. On the basis of the available data and the limited user skin exposure from cosmetic products containing Toluene, it is concluded that this ingredient is safe for cosmetic use at the present practices of use and concentration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document