scholarly journals Perbandingan Kurikulum 2013 dan Kurikulum KTSP Menmggunakan Metode Fuzzy TOPSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Moh Zainuddin ◽  
Tony Yulianto ◽  
Faisol Faisol
Keyword(s):  

Kurikulum pendidikan di Indonesia sering kali mengalami pembaharuan sesuai ketentuan pemegang kekuasaan. Pendidikan di Indonesia saat ini sudah mulai menggunakan kurikulum baru yaitu Kurikulum 2013 menggantikan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP) yang di jalankan secara terbatas mulai Juli 2013. Di lihat dari sistem metode mengajar serta cara penilaian terhadap siwa sangat berbeda. Oleh sebab itu penulis termotivasi melakukan penelitian dan membandingan kurikulum KTSP dengan kurikulum 2013 terhadap terbentuknya karakter siswa menggunakan metode fuzzy TOPSIS Sebagai sistem untuk membantu dalam pemilihan kurikulum yang terbaik. Maka dilakukan sebuah perangkingan dengan menggunakan metode fuzzy TOPSIS, sehingga dari hasil penelitian yang di dapat, kurikulum KTSP lebih baik dibandingkan kurikulum 2013.

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1034
Author(s):  
María Carmen Carnero

Due to the important advantages it offers, gamification is one of the fastest-growing industries in the world, and interest from the market and from users continues to grow. This has led to the development of more and more applications aimed at different fields, and in particular the education sector. Choosing the most suitable application is increasingly difficult, and so to solve this problem, our study designed a model which is an innovative combination of fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with the Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH) and Shannon entropy theory, to choose the most suitable gamification application for the Industrial Manufacturing and Organisation Systems course in the degree programmes for Electrical Engineering and Industrial and Automatic Electronics at the Higher Technical School of Industrial Engineering of Ciudad Real, part of the University of Castilla-La Mancha. There is no precedent in the literature that combines MACBETH and fuzzy Shannon entropy to simultaneously consider the subjective and objective weights of criteria to achieve a more accurate model. The objective weights computed from fuzzy Shannon entropy were compared with those calculated from De Luca and Termini entropy and exponential entropy. The validity of the proposed method is tested through the Preference Ranking Organisation METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) II, ELimination and Choice Expressing REality (ELECTRE) III, and fuzzy VIKOR method (VIsekriterijumska optimizacija i KOmpromisno Resenje). The results show that Quizizz is the best option for this course, and it was used in two academic years. There are no precedents in the literature using fuzzy multicriteria decision analysis techniques to select the most suitable gamification application for a degree-level university course.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Guilian Wang ◽  
Liyan Zhang ◽  
Jing Guo

This paper try to fully reveal the key factors affecting the the level of AMT application in micro- and small enterprises (MSEs) from its organizational factors by ordinal logistic regression. The results show that MSEs have a relatively high level of AMT application as a whole due to the maturity and cost reduction of basic technologies such as artificial intelligence, digital manufacturing and industrial robots. In this paper we propose manufacturing world analysis at Application using Logistic Regression and best AMT selection using Fuzzy-TOPSIS Integration approach.Considering the influence mechanism of each factor, the important factors that affect the application level of AMT are the enterprise’s market pricing power, the main production types, technical, market and management capabilities, organization development incentives and the interaction with external stakeholders. Based on the results above, the following policy implications are proposed: further expanding the customized production in MSEs to gradually improve the market pricing power, expanding the core competence of enterprises, enhancing the employee autonomy, and strengthening the interaction with industry organizations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1458
Author(s):  
Daeryong Park ◽  
Huan-Jung Fan ◽  
Jun-Jie Zhu ◽  
Taesoon Kim ◽  
Myoung-Jin Um ◽  
...  

This study evaluated a fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as a multicriteria decision making system that compensates for missing information with undefined weight factor criteria. The suggested Fuzzy TOPSIS was applied to ten potential dam sites in three river basins (the Han River, the Geum River, and the Nakdong River basins) in South Korea. To assess potential dam sites, the strategic environment assessment (SEA) monitored four categories: national preservation, endangered species, water quality, and toxic environment. To consider missing information, this study applied the Monte Carlo Simulation method with uniform and normal distributions. The results show that effects of missing information generation with one fuzzy set in GB1 site of the Geum River basin are not great in fuzzy positive-ideal solution (FPIS) and fuzzy negative-ideal solution (FNIS) estimations. However, the combination of two fuzzy sets considering missing information in Gohyun stream (NG) and Hoenggye stream (NH) sites of the Nakdong River basin has a great effect on estimating FPIS, FNIS, and priority ranking in Fuzzy TOPSIS applications. The sites with the highest priority ranking in the Han River, Geum River, and Nakdong River basins based on Fuzzy TOPSIS are the Dal stream 1 (HD1), Bocheong stream 2 (GB2) and NG sites. Among the sites in all river basins, the GB2 site had the highest priority ranking. Consequently, the results coincided with findings of previous studies based on multicriteria decision making with missing information and show the applicability of Fuzzy TOPSIS when evaluating priority rankings in cases with missing information.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 3550-3557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobing Yu ◽  
Shunsheng Guo ◽  
Jun Guo ◽  
Xiaorong Huang
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document