Land tenure and rural social change: The italian case

Erdkunde ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Russel King ◽  
Laurence Took
1981 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy H. Kemp

All too often the study of land tenure in agrarian states is treated either as a dimension of economic organization or, with respect to its more specifically formal characteristics, as pertaining to the sphere of law. With both approaches there is the danger of ignoring or at least underplaying the fact that the formulation and regulation of tenural arrangements is an expression of the political order of society. Paradoxically, familiarity with this idea has tended to limit its appreciation. Awareness of the ‘classic’ and explicit example of feudalism and its place in grand social theory may well direct attention away from the detailed examination of more diffuse forms of the relation between land tenure and political structures. Such a lack of interest is readily observable in the case of Thailand where the history of the relationship is both unusual and highly significant for the analysis of contemporary social change.


GeoJournal ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 633-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Herrera Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  

1959 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Holmberg

In 1952, Cornell University, in collaboration with the Instituto Indigenista Peruano, sublet, for a period of five years, an hacienda called Vicos, a Quechua-speaking community of about 2,000 inhabitants located in the highlands of northcentral Peru, for the purpose of conducting a research and development program on the modernization process. One of the principal developmental outcomes of this program to date has been a shift in the status of Vicos from a dependent hacienda community, controlled and administered largely from the outside, to an independent indigenous community, controlled and administered largely from within. Necessarily involved in this shift, of course, have been changes in many aspects of culture. But among the most striking of these have been fundamental alterations in the patterns of land tenure and work, some of the effects and implications of which I would like briefly to consider here.


Author(s):  
Tim Greenwood

Although the Byzantine annexation of Armenian territories in the later tenth and eleventh centuries has been studied from a number of perspectives, little attention has been paid to the subsequent history of those districts, and in particular the circumstances and the responses of the communities who stayed put. This chapter explores the social and cultural history of the district of Tarōn in the century after its incorporation as a theme. Through comparison with the annexation of Vaspurakan in 1021, it argues that both the lay and clerical elite left Tarōn in 966. This affected land tenure in several ways, including the creation of stratiotika ktemata and the imposition of the demosion. Evidence from an Armenian Gospels manuscript indicates that the land tax was still being collected—and the registers updated—as late as 1067. A new network of episcopal sees was established across the former Armenian see of Tarōn. Finally the History of Tarōn, a composition completed in the 980s, shows how one monastic community took advantage of the recent turmoil to promote its claim to foundation and endowment by St Grigor the Illuminator at the start of the fourth century. It also forged multiple links between the activities of St Grigor and the metropolitan see of Caesarea, associating the conversion of Tarōn, and by implication of Armenia, with the Byzantine Church.


1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kitty Calavita

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document