Minimally Invasive Paratenon Release for Non-Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 680-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venunatha Naidu ◽  
Ali Abbassian ◽  
Dominic Nielsen ◽  
Raju Uppalapati ◽  
Anupkumar Shetty
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

Endoscopic Haglund’s Resection and Percutaneous Double-Row Insertional Achilles Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002110027
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Miller ◽  
James R. McWilliam ◽  
Max P. Michalski ◽  
Jorge Acevedo
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Suture Anchor Repair ◽  
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

Insertional Achilles tendinopathy can be a debilitating condition that often fails to improve with nonsurgical management such as bracing and physical therapy. Traditional surgical techniques include an open debridement of the diseased tendon and resection of calcaneal spurs. This is followed by repair of the tendon. Suture anchors are often used to secure the tendon, but recent advances in tendon fixation, including the advent of double-row repairs, has allowed better biomechanical repairs and faster rehabilitation. Additionally, minimally invasive surgery and endoscopic techniques have advanced to allow successful treatment of all aspects of the condition while minimizing wound complications and infection. The authors present a technique to treat insertional Achilles tendinopathy and calcaneal bone spurs using minimally invasive surgery techniques while also incorporating a percutaneous double-row suture anchor repair. The technique utilizes 4 portals to access 2 endoscopic working planes. The burr is inserted deep to the tendon and the calcaneoplasty is performed. Subsequently, the endoscope is inserted alongside a shaver to remove bony debris and debulk the anterior aspect of the Achilles areas of tendinopathy. Following this, the portals are used to place a double-row suture anchor repair. Levels of Evidence: Level V

scholarly journals Ultrasound and surgical inspection of plantaris tendon involvement in chronic painful insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a case series

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000979
Author(s):  
Håkan Alfredson ◽  
Lorenzo Masci ◽  
Christoph Spang
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Fatty Infiltration ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Plantaris Tendon ◽  
Medial Pain ◽  
Tendon Insertion ◽  
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

ObjectivesChronic painful insertional Achilles tendinopathy is known to be difficult to manage. The diagnosis is not always easy because multiple different tissues can be involved. The plantaris tendon has recently been described to frequently be involved in chronic painful mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy. This study aimed to evaluate possible plantaris tendon involvement in patients with chronic painful insertional Achilles tendinopathy.MethodsNinety-nine consecutive patients (74 males, 25 females) with a mean age of 40 years (range 24–64) who were surgically treated for insertional Achilles tendinopathy, were included. Clinical examination, ultrasound (US)+Doppler examination, and surgical findings were used to evaluate plantaris tendon involvement.ResultsIn 48/99 patients, there were clinical symptoms of plantaris tendon involvement with pain and tenderness located medially at the Achilles tendon insertion. In all these cases, surgical findings showed a thick and wide plantaris tendon together with a richly vascularised fatty infiltration between the plantaris and Achilles tendon. US examination suspected plantaris involvement in 32/48 patients.ConclusionPlantaris tendon involvement can potentially be part of the pathology in chronic painful insertional Achilles tendinopathy and should be considered for diagnosis and treatment when there is distinct and focal medial pain and tenderness.Level of evidenceIV case series.

scholarly journals Up to a quarter of patients with certain chronic recalcitrant tendinopathies may have central sensitisation: a prospective cohort of more than 300 patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Patrick C Wheeler
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Plantar Fasciitis ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Central Sensitisation ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

Introduction: To identify the possible prevalence of ‘central sensitisation’, in patients with chronic recalcitrant lower limb tendinopathy conditions, with the Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) questionnaire. Methods: Patients with chronic lower limb tendinopathy conditions treated within a single hospital outpatient clinic specialising in tendinopathy were identified from clinical records. As part of routine care, self-reported numerical markers of pain, global function (using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire) and the CSI score to investigate the possibility of central sensitisation were completed. Results: A total of 312 suitable patients with chronic lower limb tendinopathy and similar conditions were identified, who had completed a CSI questionnaire. Of these, 108 presented with greater trochanteric pain syndrome, 12 with patella tendinopathy, 33 with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy, 48 with insertional Achilles tendinopathy and 110 with plantar fasciitis. A total of 66% of the patients were female, the median age was 54.9 years and the median duration of symptoms was 24 months. There was a median CSI score of 25%, with statistically significant differences noted between the different conditions studied. Overall, 20% of patients scored above a threshold of 40% on CSI questionnaire, indicating that central sensitisation was possible. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome and plantar fasciitis had the highest proportions in the conditions studied. Weak correlations were found between CSI and other pain scores studied. Conclusion: The CSI questionnaire may identify up to a quarter of patients with some chronic lower limb tendinopathy and associated conditions as being more likely to have central sensitisation, and these proportions differed between conditions. The clinical significance of this is unclear, but worth further study to see if/how this may relate to treatment outcomes. These are results from a single hospital clinic dealing with patients with chronic tendinopathy, and comparison with a control group is currently lacking. However, on the information presented here, the concept of central sensitisation should be considered in patients being treated for chronic tendinopathy.

The Addition of a Krackow Rip Stop Suture Augment After Achilles Tendon Debridement for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: A Biomechanical Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 193864002110336
Author(s):  
LT Thomas J. Kelsey ◽  
LT Kyle W. Mombell ◽  
CDR Todd A. Fellars
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Catastrophic Failure ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Average Load ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Repair Techniques

Background In the operative treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy, the Achilles tendon is often released from its insertion to allow for adequate debridement of pathologic tissue. The use of a double row suture anchor construct has become increasingly favorable among surgeons after Achilles tendon debridement. This study hypothesized that the addition of a Krackow rip stop suture augment to the double row suture anchor construct would increase the repair’s maximum load to failure. A biomechanically stronger repair would potentially decrease the risk of catastrophic failure with early weight-bearing or accidental forced dorsiflexion after operative management for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Methods Fourteen cadaveric specimens were used to compare the 2 repair techniques. Achilles tendons were debrided and repaired using either a double row suture anchor with and without the additional Krackow rip stop suture augment. The 2 repair techniques were compared using an axial-torsion testing system to measure average load to failure. Results The average load to failure for the double row suture anchor repair alone was 152.00 N. The average load to failure for the tendons with the double row suture anchor with the Krackow rip stop augment was 383.08 N. An independent-samples Mann-Whitney U-test was conducted and the suture anchor plus Krackow augment group had a significantly higher load to failure ( P = .011, Mann-Whitney U = 5.00, n1 = n2 = 7, P < .05, 2-tailed). Conclusion This study confirmed that the addition of a Krakow rip stop augment to the double row suture anchor is able to increase the maximum load to failure when compared to the double row suture anchor alone. These results suggest the potential of this added technique to decrease the risk of catastrophic failure.

scholarly journals Minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0048
Author(s):  
Kar Teoh ◽  
Kartik Hariharan
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Achilles Tendinopathy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Union Rate ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Calcaneal Osteotomy ◽  
Cavus Foot ◽  
One Year

Category: Hindfoot Introduction/Purpose: A calcaneal osteotomy can be used to treat a variety of pathologic entities in which the hindfoot needs realignment. Minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy (MICO) is becoming increasingly popular due to being soft tissue friendly, its ability to place other incisions nearby and high union rate. Previous studies have look specifically at medialising MICO or comparing open calcaneal osteotomy versus MICO. The purpose of our study was to compare 3 different types of commonly used MICO in our centre. Methods: Sixty-two MICO which fit the criteria were included in this study. They were performed in our unit from 2010 and 2016 and all patients had at least one year follow up data. The type of osteotomies was as follows: Medialising, n = 34, Lateralising, n =15 and Zadek (Dorsal closing wedge), n =13. Clinical and radiographic data were recorded. The diagnosis for 31/34 of the medialising MICO was Stage 2 PTTD, the diagnosis for 12/15 of the lateralising MICO was cavus foot, while the diagnosis for all Zadek MICO was for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Apart from the Zadek MICO, the other MICO were all associated with other procedures. The average age (years) were as follows: Medialising, 58 (30 – 74); Lateralising, 33 (14 – 67) and Zadek, 47 (42-62). Results: The average calcaneal displacement was 10.2 (range: 8 – 12) mm for medialising MICO, and 6.6 (4 – 8) mm for lateralising MICO(p=0.021). Average time to union was 7.8 (5.4 – 11.6) weeks for medialising MICO, 6.2 (4.6 to 7.9) weeks for lateralising MICO, and 6.1 (4.1 – 7.6) weeks for Zadek MICO. All the MICO healed radiologically and clinically. Five (8%) patients (Medialising, n = 2; Lateralising n =2; Zadek, n =1) reported transient sural nerve paraesthesia following surgery. Wound problems developed in 5 patients (Lateralising, n =3; Zadek, n =2). The number of total complications were as follow: Medialising, n = 5, Lateralising, n = 7 and Zadek, n =5. Average length of stay was as follows: Medialising, 2(0-8) days; Lateralising, 1(0-3) day and Zadek, 1(0-3) day. Conclusion: Minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy was safe with a high union rate and low complication rates and length of stay across all 3 common osteotomies. The average calcaneal displacement was significantly less for lateralising than medialising which is similar to reported figures for open osteotomy. Wound problems were more likely for lateralising and Zadek MICO compared to medialising and this could be because of how the osteotomies are shifted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document