scholarly journals Primary Care Physicians' Assessments of Older Patients' Health and Psychological Status and Recommendation of Mammography

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. Wittink ◽  
H. R. Bogner
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C. Tierney ◽  
Gary Naglie ◽  
Ross Upshur ◽  
Liisa Jaakkimainen ◽  
Rahim Moineddin ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 576-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Stepanikova ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Darryl Wieland ◽  
G. Paul Eleazer ◽  
Thomas Stewart

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Mold ◽  
G. E. Fryer ◽  
A. M. Roberts

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7S_Part_4) ◽  
pp. P190-P191
Author(s):  
Mary C. Tierney ◽  
Jocelyn Charles ◽  
R. Liisa Jaakkimainen ◽  
Ross Upshur ◽  
Gary Naglie ◽  
...  

Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 69-78
Author(s):  
N. V. Pogosova ◽  
S. S. Isakova ◽  
O. Y. Sokolova ◽  
A. K. Ausheva ◽  
R. A. Zhetisheva ◽  
...  

Aim      To study features of the psychological status, job burnout syndrome (JBS)m and quality of life (QoL) in outpatient physicians.Material and methods  This cross-sectional study was performed at 16 randomly selected municipal outpatient hospitals of Moscow and included physicians (district physicians, primary care physicians, and cardiologists). The participants signed an informed consent form and then filled out a registration card that included major social and demographic (sex, age, education, position) and professional characteristics (specialization, work experience, qualification category), and questionnaires. The degree of job burnout was evaluated with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-HSS), and the presence of anxio-depressive symptoms was evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The level of stress was assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS) in a score range from 0 to 10. The QoL of physicians was assessed with the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (HOQOL-BREF) questionnaire.Results This study included 108 physicians from 16 municipal outpatient clinics aged 24 to 70 years (mean age, 44.0±13.1 years), mostly women (87.0 %). Among JBS components, a high level of emotional exhaustion was observed in 50.0 % of physicians, a high level of depersonalization in 34.1 %, and a severe reduction of personal accomplishment in 37.5 %. A high level of stress (VAS score ≥7) was observed in 66.3 % of physicians; symptoms of anxiety and depression of any degree (HADS-A and HADS-D subscale score ≥ 8) were found in 23.8 and 22.7 % of participants, respectively. 42.0% of physicians evaluated their QoL lower than “good” and 41.6% of physicians evaluated their health condition lower than “good”. Most of the studied factors did not significantly depend on the gender and the duration of work, except for emotional exhaustion (55.3 % of women and 16.7 % of men; p=0.0086) and a high level of stress (72.2 % of women and 28.6 % of men; р=0.002).Conclusion      The study showed a high prevalence of personal factors that potentially adversely affect the work of outpatient physicians. These factors included high degrees of stress, anxio-depressive symptoms, job burnout, unsatisfactory QoL, and low satisfaction with own health. Management decisions and actions are required to create the optimum psychological climate at the workplace of physicians, to develop new strategies for prophylaxis and correction of their psychological condition, and to implement comprehensive programs for improving the professional environment to maintain and enhance the mental health and to increase the professional prestige of the medical speciality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C. Tierney ◽  
Jocelyn Charles ◽  
Gary Naglie ◽  
Liisa Jaakkimainen ◽  
Rahim Moineddin

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Elston Lafata ◽  
Richard F. Brown ◽  
Michael P. Pignone ◽  
Scott Ratliff ◽  
L. Aubree Shay

Background. Despite its widespread advocacy, shared decision making (SDM) is not routinely used for cancer screening. To better understand the implementation barriers, we describe primary care physicians’ (PCPs’) support for SDM across diverse cancer screening contexts. Methods. Surveys were mailed to a random sample of USA-based PCPs. Using multivariable logistic regression analyses, we tested for associations of PCPs’ support of SDM with the US Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) assigned recommendation grade, assessed whether the decision pertained to not screening older patients, and the PCPs’ autonomous v. controlled motivation-orientation for using SDM. Results. PCPs (n = 278) were, on average, aged 52 years, 38% female, and 69% white. Of these, 79% endorsed discussing screening benefits as very important to SDM; 64% for discussing risks; and 31% for agreeing with patient’s opinion. PCPs were most likely to rate SDM as very important for colorectal cancer screening in adults aged 50–75 years (69%), and least likely for colorectal cancer screening in adults aged >85 years (34%). Regression results indicated the importance of PCPs’ having autonomous or self-determined reasons for engaging in SDM (e.g., believing in the benefits of SDM) (OR = 2.29, 95% CI, 1.87 to 2.79). PCPs’ support for SDM varied by USPSTF recommendation grade (overall contrast, X2 = 14.7; P = 0.0054), with support greatest for A-Grade recommendations. Support for SDM was lower in contexts where decisions pertained to not screening older patients (OR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.56). Limitations. It is unknown whether PCPs’ perceptions of the importance of SDM behaviors differs with specific screening decisions or the potential limited ability to generalize findings. Conclusions. Our results highlight the need to document SDM benefits and consider the specific contextual challenges, such as the level of uncertainty or whether evidence supports recommending/not recommending screening, when implementing SDM across an array of cancer screening contexts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document