scholarly journals Is There a “Gestalt Bias” in Indulgence? Subjectively Constructing Food Units into Wholes (Versus Parts) Increases Desire to Eat and Actual Consumption

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Joye ◽  
Sabrina Bruyneel ◽  
Bob M Fennis

In the present work we extend research into the unit bias effect and its extension—the portion size effect—by demonstrating the existence of a “Gestalt bias.” Drawing on the tenets of Gestalt psychology, we show that a unit bias effect can be observed for food portions that are composed of identical basic units, but which are subjectively grouped into, or perceived as a Gestalt—a larger whole. In three studies, we find that such subjectively constructed food wholes constitute a new (perceptual) unit that is perceived bigger than the units it is constructed from, thereby prompting increased eating and desire to eat.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Joye ◽  
Sabrina Bruyneel ◽  
Bob M. Fennis

In the present work we extend research into the unit bias effect and its extension—the portion size effect—by demonstrating the existence of a “Gestalt bias.” Drawing on the tenets of Gestalt psychology, we show that a unit bias effect can be observed for food portions that are composed of identical basic units, but which are subjectively grouped into, or perceived as a Gestalt—a larger whole. In three studies, we find that such subjectively constructed food wholes constitute a new (perceptual) unit that is perceived bigger than the units it is constructed from, thereby prompting increased eating and desire to eat.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Stanley Burger ◽  
Susan L. Johnson

Increases in portion size lead to increases in energy intake, yet the mechanisms behind this ‘portion size effect’ are unclear. This study tested possible mechanisms of the portion size effect i.e., bite size and visual cues in 30 over- and normal-weight individuals (15 men, 15 women). A 2x2 repeated measures, within-subject design was used to test the effects of portion size (410g vs. 820g of a pasta dish) and visual cues (blindfolded vs. visible) on energy intake. At each meal participants were exposed to one of four experimental conditions (small portion/visible; small portion/blindfold; large portion/visible; large portion/blindfold). Participant characteristics, food intake, number of bites, meal duration, palatability measures and hunger and fullness were assessed. In response to a doubling of the portion presented, entrée energy intake increased 26% (220kcal P < 0.001) and mean bite size increased 2.4g/bite (P < 0.05). Overweight individuals consumed 40% (334kcal) more of the entrée in response to the large portion condition (P < 0.05), while lean individuals’ intakes did not differ (P < 0.56). A 12% (122kcal) decrease in entrée intake was observed in the blindfolded condition (P < 0.01), but no portion by visual cue interaction was found; indicating that blindfolding did not attenuate the portion size effect. These data suggest that the portion size effect is greater in overweight individuals and occurs via changes in bite size.


Appetite ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faris M. Zuraikat ◽  
Liane S. Roe ◽  
Christine E. Sanchez ◽  
Barbara J. Rolls

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331
Author(s):  
E. Gray ◽  
H.T. Lau ◽  
R. Lee ◽  
L. Lockshin ◽  
C. Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Appetite ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Keenan ◽  
Louise Childs ◽  
Peter J. Rogers ◽  
Marion M. Hetherington ◽  
Jeffrey M. Brunstrom
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1325-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Ferriday ◽  
Jeffrey M. Brunstrom

Exposure to the sight and smell of food influences our momentary desire to consume it. This study explored the process by which cue exposure promotes greater consumption of food. Three hypotheses were explored, cue exposure: (i) increases the planned consumption of food; (ii) increases tolerance of larger portion sizes; (iii) arrests the development of satiety. Female participants (n50) were each tested in two conditions. In a ‘cue condition’ they were exposed to the sight and smell of pizza for 60 s. Before and after this period they provided information about prospective and maximum tolerated portion sizes and their desire to eat pizza and other non-cued foods. Participants then consumed a fixed portion of pizza, rated their hunger and were finally offeredad libitumaccess to pizza. In the ‘no-cue condition’, cue exposure was replaced with a cognitive task. Cueing had little effect on tolerance of larger portion sizes or on hunger after consuming the fixed portion. Instead, it increased prospective pizza portion size and subsequent intake of pizza. Together, these results suggest that cueing increases the amount of food that people actively plan to eat. This plan is then executed, leading to greater intake. Pizza cueing also increased prospective portion size of other foods. Thus, contrary to previous reports, effects of exposure may generalise to other foods. Finally, we found evidence that restrained eaters are less ‘cue reactive’ than unrestrained eaters. In future, our approach might be adapted to consider whether heightened ‘cue reactivity’ represents a risk factor for obesity.


Appetite ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 39-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laural English ◽  
Marlou Lasschuijt ◽  
Kathleen L. Keller
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document