subsequent intake
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Blake Palmer ◽  
Christopher Irwin ◽  
Danielle McCartney ◽  
Gregory Ronald Cox ◽  
Ben Desbrow

This study examined the impact of varying the holding time following an ad libitum laboratory breakfast on acute dietary behaviour and subsequent intake. 24 participants (20 females (age: 23.4±6.3 y; BMI: 23.9±3.9 kg·m-2, mean±SD)) completed three trials following a quasi-randomized, crossover design. Each trial (seven day separation) incorporated a defined post-prandial delay (DPD) period of either zero (no delay), one or three hours following a buffet breakfast consumed over 30-minutes. Dietary intake outcomes included energy, macronutrient and core food group intakes. On completion of the DPD period, participants left the laboratory and recorded all food/beverages consumed for the remainder of the day. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA assessed all outcomes, with post hoc analysis conducted on significant main effects. Energy and carbohydrate intakes were significantly lower on no delay vs one hour (p = 0.014) and three hour (p = 0.06) DPD trials (EI: 1853±814 kJ vs. 2250±1345 kJ vs. 1948±1289 kJ; CHO: 68±34 g vs. 77±44 vs. 69±43 g; respectively). DPD periods did not influence the time to consume next meal or energy, macronutrient and core food group intakes for the remainder of the day. Delaying participants from leaving a laboratory alters dietary intake at an ad libitum test meal. The post-meal holding period is an important methodological consideration when planning laboratory studies to assess appetite. Novelty Bullets: 1. Delaying participants from leaving a laboratory alters dietary intake at ad libitum breakfast meals. 2. The length of the delay period did not affect dietary intake at ad libitum breakfast meals


Author(s):  
Stefanie D. Krens ◽  
Floor J. E. Lubberman ◽  
Marthe Egmond ◽  
Frank G. A. Jansman ◽  
David M. Burger ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Michèle Andrist ◽  
Lukas Jörg ◽  
Thomas Greuter ◽  
Anna Gschwend ◽  
Alex Straumann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease that has been known since the early 1990s. Swallowed topical corticosteroids (STC) belong to the therapeutic cornerstones. We describe a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to Jorveza®, a newly developed orodispersible budesonide tablet licensed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Case presentation A 32-year-old Caucasian woman with EoE was newly treated with Jorveza®. Hours after the first intake, she felt a “strange pruritus” in the throat. This sensation worsened with each subsequent intake. On day 4 she developed oral mucosal symptoms (paresthesia of the tongue, sore and an itchy throat). Intraoral, throat and facial swellings, but no systemic reaction were observed. Patch testing using two commercial test series as well as the orodispersible budesonide tablet revealed a strong sensitization, proving a T cell mediated allergy to budesonide. Conclusions Orodispersible budesonide is increasingly prescribed for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The development of oropharyngeal symptoms after initiating should alert the treating physician to the possibility of a hypersensitivity reaction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 60-71
Author(s):  
Hua Ao ◽  
Jiachun Li ◽  
Ouwen Li ◽  
Manyi Su ◽  
Xiao Gao

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
Angelina Rubina

Within VanPatten’s (1990, 2004) framework of input processing, this study investigates how different types of form-meaning attentional conditions affect comprehension of written input. VanPatten’s (1990, 2004) views learners as limited capacity processors, attending to content before grammatical form, and argues that attention to form takes away some processing capacity, resulting in lower content intake. Recent research contradicts these findings (e.g., Leow, Hsieh, & Moreno 2008). However, most evidence on form-meaning connections comes from L2 Spanish (e.g., VanPatten 1990, Leow et al. 2008), which calls for evaluating the generalizability of PMP cross-linguistically. Addressing this drawback, this research assesses how intake is affected by 1) simultaneous attention to form and meaning in L2 German and 2) L2 proficiency for different attentional conditions. Results indicate that processing for form in L2 German has no significant effect on simultaneous processing for meaning and on subsequent intake, regardless of the proficiency level.


Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1638
Author(s):  
Tyler Maher ◽  
Alistair Sampson ◽  
Magdalena Goslawska ◽  
Cristina Pangua-Irigaray ◽  
Amir Shafat ◽  
...  

Consuming medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) may reduce subsequent energy intake and increase satiety compared to long-chain triglycerides (LCT) but this may be dependent on the physical form in which MCT is ingested. Twenty-nine participants completed four trials where they consumed a breakfast containing either LCT or MCT in solid (Con-S and MCT-S, respectively) or liquid (Con-L and MCT-L, respectively) form. Appetite ratings and gastric emptying (GE) were taken at baseline and at 15 min intervals for 4 h. Energy intake was assessed at an ad libitum meal and via weighed food records for the remainder of the day. Ad libitum energy intake was highest in Con-L (4101 ± 1278 kJ vs. Con-S, 3323 ± 1196; MCT-S, 3516 ± 1058; MCT-L, 3257 ± 1345; p = 0.001). Intake over the whole day was significantly lower in MCT-L (7904 ± 3244) compared to Con-L (9531 ± 3557; p = 0.001). There were significant differences in GE times (p < 0.05), with MCT breakfasts delaying GE to a greater extent than LCT, and MCT-L having the longest GE times. There were no differences in appetite sensations. MCT reduce subsequent intake without affecting subjective sensations of appetite when consumed in liquid form.


Appetite ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 93-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lana Seguias ◽  
Katy Tapper

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 690-696
Author(s):  
N. Sathish Kumar ◽  
P. Govindasamy

Introducing a fuel injector is a systems for explaining fuel keep on interior combustion engine and also in the automatically engine based vehicles for this procedure need diesel engine is a necessity while using petrol engines fuel injector is an different to the carburettor, mainly this work is used in spray nozzle may be this process of a fuel comes output cars consume. Biodiesel may produce the chemical function called Tran's esterification from the vegetable oil or animal fact oil glycerine should be removed this kind of the procedure may create two chemical reaction named as methyl ester and glycerine. Biodiesel is namely called as diesel fuel it has the pure form (B100) or blended with petroleum diesel. For many kind of the cars are mechanism in internal combustion (IC) the issues expend Sequential Fuel Injector (SFI) is similar called as timed injection it can remain generates. When the subsequent intake control device unlocks individually, nozzle self-sufficient and be the consumption regulator unties.


2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 1353-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Fallaize ◽  
Louise Wilson ◽  
Juliet Gray ◽  
Linda M. Morgan ◽  
Bruce A. Griffin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document