You see what you look for: perceptual biases induced by targets and distractors in visual search

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Rafiei ◽  
Andrey Chetverikov ◽  
Sabrina Hansmann-Roth ◽  
Arni Kristjansson

Visual perception is, at any given moment, strongly influenced by its temporal context – what stimuli have recently been perceived and in what surroundings. We have previously shown that to-be-ignored items produce a bias upon subsequent perception that acts in parallel with other biases induced by attended items. However, our previous investigations were confined to biases upon a visual search target's perceived orientation, and it is unclear whether these biases influence perception in a more general sense. Canonical paradigms investigating so-called serial dependence have revealed biases in the perception of items not associated with any particular task. Therefore, we test here whether the biases from visual search targets and distractors affect the perceived orientation of a neutral test line, which is neither a target nor a distractor. To do so, we asked participants to search for an oddly oriented line among distractors and report its location for a few trials and then presented a task-irrelevant test line. Next, participants were asked to report the orientation of the test line. Our results indicate that in tasks involving visual search, targets induce a positive bias upon a neutral test line if their orientations are similar, and distractors also produce a repulsive bias if the test line's orientations and the distractors' average orientation are far apart in feature space. Additionally, our results show that proximity in feature space between previous and current stimuli plays a large role in determining the direction of the perceptual biases.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Rafiei ◽  
Sabrina Hansmann-Roth ◽  
David Whitney ◽  
Arni Kristjansson ◽  
Andrey Chetverikov

Humans have remarkable abilities to construct a stable visual world from continuously changing input. There is increasing evidence that momentary visual input blends with previous input to preserve perceptual continuity. Most studies have shown that such influences can be traced to characteristics of the attended object at a given moment. Little is known about the role of ignored stimuli in creating this continuity. This is important since while some input is selected for processing, other input must be actively ignored for efficient selection of the task-relevant stimuli. We asked whether attended targets and actively ignored distractor stimuli in an odd-one-out search task would bias observers’ perception differently. Our observers searched for an oddly oriented line among distractors, and were occasionally asked to report the orientation of the last visual search target they saw in an adjustment task. Our results show that at least two opposite biases from past stimuli influence current perception: A positive bias caused by serial dependence pulls perception of the target toward the previous target features, while a negative bias induced by the to-be-ignored distractor features pushes perception of the target away from the distractor distribution. Our results suggest that to-be-ignored items produce a perceptual bias that acts in parallel with other biases induced by attended items to optimize perception. Our results are the first to demonstrate how actively ignored information facilitates continuity in visual perception.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Rafiei ◽  
Sabrina Hansmann-Roth ◽  
David Whitney ◽  
Arni Kristjansson ◽  
Andrey Chetverikov

Humans have remarkable abilities to construct a stable visual world from continuously changing input. There is increasing evidence that momentary visual input blends with previous input to preserve perceptual continuity. Most studies have shown that such influences can be traced to characteristics of the attended object at a given moment. Little is known about the role of ignored stimuli in creating this continuity. This is important since while some input is selected for processing, other input must be actively ignored for efficient selection of the task-relevant stimuli. We asked whether attended targets and actively ignored distractor stimuli in an odd-one-out search task would bias observers’ perception differently. Our observers searched for an oddly oriented line among distractors, and were occasionally asked to report the orientation of the last visual search target they saw in an adjustment task. Our results show that at least two opposite biases from past stimuli influence current perception: A positive bias caused by serial dependence pulls perception of the target toward the previous target features, while a negative bias induced by the to-be-ignored distractor features pushes perception of the target away from the distractor distribution. Our results suggest that to-be-ignored items produce a perceptual bias that acts in parallel with other biases induced by attended items to optimize perception. Our results are the first to demonstrate how actively ignored information facilitates continuity in visual perception.Keywords:


Author(s):  
Derek S. Hutcheson

This chapter focuses on mobilisation and turnout in Russia’s parliamentary elections. Through the use of electoral data, and focus group and survey results, it examines how voters balance cost, benefit, civic duty, and systemic disenchantment in a calculus of whether to vote. The first part of the chapter looks at the efforts of the authorities to mobilise voters using ‘administrative resources’, while the remainder of the chapter looks at how voters respond to these. Examination is made of the bases of turnout; patterns of and explanations for abstention; and the profiles of non-voters compared with those who cast a ballot. Many of those who do so vote out of a general sense of civic duty, rather than because they feel any sense of efficacy; and cynicism about the process has steadily been growing throughout the past few years.


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 2231-2239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carsten N. Boehler ◽  
Mircea A. Schoenfeld ◽  
Hans-Jochen Heinze ◽  
Jens-Max Hopf

Attention to one feature of an object can bias the processing of unattended features of that object. Here we demonstrate with ERPs in visual search that this object-based bias for an irrelevant feature also appears in an unattended object when it shares that feature with the target object. Specifically, we show that the ERP response elicited by a distractor object in one visual field is modulated as a function of whether a task-irrelevant color of that distractor is also present in the target object that is presented in the opposite visual field. Importantly, we find this modulation to arise with a delay of approximately 80 msec relative to the N2pc—a component of the ERP response that reflects the focusing of attention onto the target. In a second experiment, we demonstrate that this modulation reflects enhanced neural processing in the unattended object. These observations together facilitate the surprising conclusion that the object-based selection of irrelevant features is spatially global even after attention has selected the target object.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Yoko Higuchi ◽  
Terumasa Endo ◽  
Satoshi Inoue ◽  
Takatsune Kumada

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Manassi ◽  
Árni Kristjánsson ◽  
David Whitney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document