scholarly journals Talk of Markets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Adler ◽  
Daniel Hirschman
Keyword(s):  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Economic Sociology ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Market Price ◽  
National Income ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Market Prices ◽  
Cultural Object ◽  
Key Features

This paper examines “market talk” as a pervasive and flexible cultural tool. We analyze two cases in which the market is invoked as a justification: employers’ pay-setting practices and the exclusion of unpaid housework from calculations of gross domestic product. Employers interpret a candidate’s past salary as “the market price” indicating that individual's value, and thus use salary history as the basis for salary offers. National income statisticians argue that the absence of market prices for housework renders housewives' true economic value uncalculable. We identify three key features of market talk: authority, credibility, and accessibility. These features offer a framework for understanding why actors invoke markets and with what effects. Beyond understanding how culture constitutes or affects markets, economic sociology must also understand the market as a cultural object and, in particular, as a potent and gendered form of justification.

scholarly journals An Economics Analysis: Trend & Performance of Agriculture Production in Haryana

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1184-1189
Author(s):  
Dr. Rajinder Godara ◽  
Bal krishan
Keyword(s):  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
National Income ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Agriculture Sector ◽  
Yield Production ◽  
Tube Wells ◽  
And Performance

The Agriculture sector is the mainstay role of Indian’s Economy & livelihood through the generate of employment in the agriculture sector. With the passage of time the Agriculture & Allied Sector is continuously declining because of a cause of land fragmented day by day. Due to the land fragmented but ours’ dependency on the industrial sector as well as the services sector. In the agriculture sector in 2017-18 of the workforce, 50 percent of people engagement depends on the agriculture sector. Further agriculture sector contribution 17-18 percent of the total GDP (Gross domestic product) of national income. In Haryana state agriculture contribution is about 14.5 percent to its gross domestic product (GDP) while providing employment 51 percent of the workforce engaged in agriculture. Further, about 75% of the area is irrigated, through tube Wells and an extensive system of canals. About 2/3rd of the State has assured irrigation, most suited for a rice-wheat production system, whereas rain-fed lands around 1/5th are most suited for rapeseed & mustard, pearl millet, cluster bean cultivation, agro-forestry, and arid-horticulture. Methodology Statistical Techniques and Tools: The secondary data published from Haryana statistical Abstract, Economic The survey, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, published Research papers in the journal, and agriculture reports and so on. To compute the growth behavior of trends and performance of agriculture production in Haryana farm area, yield, production and income, the exponential function will be fitted. Review of Literature, Problem increasing the productivity in Haryana. Improved agriculture Productivity

Analisis Pengaruh Utang terhadap Perekonomian dan Kemiskinan di Indonesia Periode 1949-2017

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Dedi Junaedi ◽  
Muhammad Rizal Arsyad
Keyword(s):  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Foreign Debt ◽  
National Income ◽  
National Development ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Debt Management ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Population Number ◽  
Better Than

Since  independence,  Indonesia   has   experienced  seven   changes   of   national leadership. Starting from  Soekarno, Soeharto, BJ Habibie, Abdurahman Wahid, Megawati, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY), to Joko Widodo. During that time, foreign debt is always present to patch the development budget deficit. Debt is expected to move the wheels of the economy, create growth, create jobs, and alleviate poverty. This study aims  to  analyze  the  effect  of  debt, inflation  and  government regime differences on economic growth and poverty levels in Indonesia, from the Old Order era, the New Order, to the Reform Order. The study used  secondary data obtained from Bank Indonesia,  the National  Development  Planning  Agency (Bappenas), the Central  Bureau of Statistics (BPS), the World Bank, and other reference sources such as books, journals and scientific  papers. The data used  are  the value of  foreign debt, national income (Gross Domestic Product / GDP), population,  number and ratio of  the poor, inflation  rate in the period 1949 - 2017. The results  of  multiple  regression analysis  with  dummy variable (using  Eviews 10 application  program) show the  following  results:  Foreign debt has  correlation with  the national economic condition, in particular the value of Indonesian Gross Domestic Product and the level  of poverty. Debt tends to increase the value of GDP and reduce poverty. In terms of debt governance as a driver of the economy and poverty, the Suharto and Habibie Era tend to be different and better than the Sukarno Era. While the debt management of Era Abdurrahman Wahid, Era Megawati, Era SBY and Era Jokowi no different or no better than Era Sukarno. Although  nationally  can increase GDP and reduce poverty, debt can not improve people's prosperity (read per capita income). Foreign debt even tends to reduce the level of welfare of the people. This applies to all government regimes.    

scholarly journals Protection of Intellectual Property and its Economic Aspects

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Lenka Pelegrinová ◽  
Martin Lačný
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
National Income ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Panel Data Regression ◽  
Data Regression ◽  
Significant Probability ◽  
Per Capita

Intellectual property as assets in intangible form is classified in most countries under the definitions of the TRIPS Agreement and PCT according to the manner of its protection. This article presents results of an analysis of relationship between the protection of intellectual property rights at certain globalization level and verification of their influence on economic indicators in the selected countries of the research sample – 32 countries of a similar intellectual property protection system under the PCT. An examination of the level of globalization as a quantitative marker was enabled by the KOF Index of Globalization. The time and cross-sectional data enabled to test 352 objections by applying a non-parametric statistical method – panel data regression with the effect of random cross-sectional variables. The conclusions show that there is a statistically significant probability of the relation between the quantity of registered patents and the level of gross domestic product, gross domestic product per capita and adjusted net national income.

scholarly journals Factors of Production Influencing Gross Domestic Product in Nepal

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-45
Author(s):  
Prabhat Jha ◽  
Shiva Chandra Dhakal
Keyword(s):  
Gross Domestic Product ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Labour Force ◽  
National Income ◽  
Regression Function ◽  
Domestic Product ◽  
Average Growth Rate ◽  
Average Growth ◽  
Fixed Capital Formation ◽  
Factors Of Production

This study has analysed the factors of production, viz; agricultural land, working force and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) of Nepal between 2000/01-2017/18 AD and has determined their effects on national income, viz; Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by using Cobb-Douglas regression function. The results showed an average growth rate of GDP, agricultural land, working force and GFCF to be 3.9%, 0.8%, 1.5% and 7.9%, respectively, with the values plummeting in 2015/16, due to occurrence of the devastating earthquake in 2015, but then again variable values skyrocketed following years. The regression analysis found that GDP was affected significantly by agricultural land and working force, but insignificant with GFCF. On an average, with the increase in agricultural land and working force by 1 %, GDP increased by 1.1% and 1.7%, respectively. Thus, policy regarding an increment of agricultural land use and employment of labour force must be framed to improve the Nepalese economy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document