Casual sexual relationships: Identifying definitions for one night stands, booty calls, fuck buddies, and friends with benefits

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn J. Wentland ◽  
Elke Reissing
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 1123-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara J. Collins ◽  
Tori L. Horn

Casual sexual relationships (CSRs) are common among young adults. Although it is a widely discussed topic in the popular media, little empirical work has examined the expectations related to communication within these relationships. Moreover, few studies have made comparative examinations across various relationship types. Through two studies, we first identified the differences in communication, satisfaction, and commitment across relationship types. Then we examined communication frequency as a regulator of satisfaction and commitment across relationship types. In Study 1, participants responded to a hypothetical relationship scenario depicting either a committed relationship (CR), friends with benefits (FWB), or a booty call/fuck buddy relationship (BC/FB); they indicated how committed and satisfied they would feel as well as how frequently they would communicate with the partner. Participants in Study 2 reported on these variables in their most recently terminated relationship. Overall, we found the highest frequencies of commitment and communication in CRs; BCs/FBs and other similar CSRs had the lowest. FWBs often fell between the other two categories. Satisfaction did not differ reliably across relationship types. A serial mediational analysis revealed that the more a relationship was considered to be a CR, the more partners communicated, which was associated with more satisfaction and, in turn, commitment. Our findings highlight the distinctions between expectations within FWB relationships, compared to other relationships types, suggesting that they fall somewhere between CRs and other CSRs on commitment and relational expectations. In addition, the results support the idea that individuals intentionally regulate their communication to maintain the expected level of commitment within a relationship.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Vojt ◽  
Maria Pothoulaki ◽  
Rebecca Laidlaw ◽  
Paul Flowers

We conducted a scoping review with the aim of examining the peer reviewed literature (1970-2020, within OECD countries) that had a primary focus upon types of sexual relationships and associated sexual partners (‘partnerships). Using a systematic search strategy, we examined 56 out of 15,592 papers which detailed types of sexual relationship and associated sexual partners. We found most studies were published within the C21st, with the majority conducted within the USA. Studies used a range of primarily quantitative designs. We examined the number of partnerships noted in included papers; to appraise existing work regarding any partner typologies. We found that studies tended to have a close focus on one kind of relationship/partner (e.g., ‘casual’) rather than explore a large range of diverse partnership types. Subsequently we synthesised the types of relationship/partner detailed within the literature by extracting and interpreting the commonalities and differences among reported partnership types. In this way, we were able to develop a spectrum of eight categories of relationships. These categories were; 1) ‘married/committed’; 2) ‘main partner’/’serious partner’/’stable’ or ‘Long term’; 3) ‘steady’; 4) ‘girlfriend’/’boyfriend’; 5) ‘dating’/’going out’; 6) ‘friends with benefits’; 7) ‘fuck buddies’ and ‘booty calls’; and finally: 8) ‘super casual’, ‘hook-ups’, ‘meets and one night stands’. It is hoped that these synthesised categories will be useful for those wishing to target and tailor sexual health interventions by relationship/partner type, or enhance further theoretical research into romantic and sexual relationships.


Author(s):  
Shannon Claxton ◽  
Manfred Van Dulmen

Casual sexual relationships and experiences (CSREs) such as hookups, one-night stands, friends with benefits relationships, and booty calls have received increasing attention in the past decade. This review examines the role of CSREs during emerging adulthood, as well as similarities and differences among the different types of CSREs. The authors also examine the predictors and positive and negative consequences of engaging in CSREs. Although research in the area of CSREs has provided important information about the development and course of these relationships/experiences, future research should focus on exploring these relationships and experiences using an integrated theoretical perspective and longitudinal methods, in diverse, non-college samples.


Author(s):  
Suzanne Ryan ◽  
Jennifer Manlove ◽  
Kerry Franzetta

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa J. Martin ◽  
Koby Binks ◽  
Darian Andrew ◽  
Stefan McNamara ◽  
Alicia Schimanski ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean G. Massey ◽  
Ann M. Merriwether ◽  
Justin R. Garcia ◽  
Ian F. Macdonald ◽  
Danielle Wagner

Author(s):  
Laura E. Vanderdrift ◽  
Justin J. Lehmiller ◽  
Janice R. Kelly

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document