AASHTO’s Load and Resistance Factor Design Specifications for Transverse Braces: Adverse Effects on Integrity and Durability of Reinforced Concrete Deck Slabs

2000 ◽  
Vol 1740 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin P. Burke ◽  
Joseph S. Seif

The transverse bracing provisions (diaphragms, cross-braces, crossframes, and so on) of the 1998 AASHTO load and resistance factor design (LRFD) bridge design specifications for the design of deck-type highway bridges are examined. This examination suggests that implementation of these provisions not only will have an adverse effect on the integrity and durability of reinforced concrete deck slabs, and consequently on life-cycle bridge costs; implementation of such provisions also has the potential to affect the desirability of steel bridge construction adversely. Instead of avoiding the use of midspan braces, as implied by LRFD provisions, it is urged that midspan braces be more generally recognized as primary elements of complex superstructure structural systems and thus be sized and spaced to function not only as transverse flange braces but also integrally with concrete deck slabs to distribute vehicular loads laterally. Such a practice not only will yield more efficient higher-quality structural systems capable of functioning effectively for 100 years or more, thus doubling their presently expected lives, but it will also help extend the service lives of the more vulnerable reinforced concrete deck slabs.

2000 ◽  
Vol 1696 (1) ◽  
pp. 316-322
Author(s):  
Chris Eamon ◽  
Andrzej S. Nowak ◽  
Michael A. Ritter ◽  
Joe Murphy

Recently AASHTO adopted a load and resistance factor design code for highway bridges. The new code provides a rational basis for the design of steel and concrete structures. However, the calibration was not done for wood bridges. Therefore, there is a need to fill this gap. The development of statistical models for wood bridge structures is discussed. Recent test results provided a considerable amount of new data for sawed wood and glulam components. Statistical methods provide a good tool for development of rational models for loads and resistance. Because of the random nature of load and resistance, reliability is a convenient measure of structural performance that also provides a rational basis for comparison of wood and other structural materials. The results of a recent project that led to development of rational design criteria for wood bridges are presented. The structural reliability of selected wooden bridges designed by the AASHTO codes are determined, and inadequacies in load distribution and material resistance in the current specifications are identified.


1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 514-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baidar Bakht ◽  
Akhilesh C. Agarwal

Canadian codes allow the design of concrete deck slabs of slab-on-girder bridges by taking account of the internal arching action that develops in these slabs under concentrated wheel loads in particular. Provided that certain prescribed conditions are met, a deck slab is deemed to have met the design criteria if it is provided with a top and a bottom layer of steel reinforcement with each layer consisting of an orthogonal mesh of steel bars in which the area of cross section of the bars in each direction is at least 0.3% of the effective area of cross section of the deck slab. For deck slabs of bridges having skew angles greater than 20°, the codes require the minimum amount of reinforcement to be doubled in the end zones near the skew supports. Model testing has shown that need for such an increase can be eliminated by providing composite end diaphragms with high flexural rigidity in the horizontal plane. The proposed concept is tested on a model of fibre-reinforced concrete deck without steel reinforcement in which deficiencies in the confinement of the deck slab readily manifest themselves in form of a bending, rather than punching shear, failure. Key words: highway bridges, bridge decks, deck slabs, skew deck, skew bridges, fibre-reinforced concrete decks.


Author(s):  
George G. Goble

A load and resistance factor design (LRFD) bridge specification has been accepted by the AASHTO Bridge Committee. This design approach is now being implemented for highway bridges in the United States, including the design of driven pile foundations. To test the new specification's practicality and usefulness, an example problem has been solved using it. In the example, a pipe pile was designed to be driven into a granular soil to support a bridge column subjected to a factored axial compression load of 10 MN. The nominal strength selected for the pile was 1.58 MN with an estimated length of 25 m. Since the resistance factors are defined by the specified quality control procedures, the number of piles required in the foundation also depends on the quality control. In this example, the number of piles required varied from 15 to 8 with improved quality control, for a savings of almost half of the piles. This example indicated that the new AASHTO LRFD specification for driven pile design can be used effectively to produce a more rationally designed foundation. Some modifications should be made to include additional serviceability limit states, and additional research may indicate that changes should be made in some of the resistance factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document