Application of Platelet Function Test in Prevention of Ischemic Stroke After Stent Placement in Intracranial Aneurysms

Background: Aspirin “resistance” (i.e. hyporesponsiveness to aspirin in a platelet function test) has been widely reported, but the underlying mechanism is unclear. We examined the role of pre-existent platelet hyperreactivity in aspirin “resistance”. We also determined the correlation between aspirin resistance defined by serum thromboxane (TX) B 2 (the most specific test of aspirin’s effect) and other assays of platelet function. Methods: Platelet function measured before and after aspirin 81 mg daily for 7 days was analyzed by Spearman’s rank correlation. Normal subjects (n=165) were studied because virtually all clinically relevant patients are already taking aspirin. An additional advantage of the use of normal subjects is that the platelet response to stimuli is not influenced (with resultant increased scatter of the data) by an underlying disease, e.g. coronary artery disease, which causes platelet hyperreactivity. Results: The proportion of the post-aspirin platelet function predicted by the pre-aspirin platelet function was 28.3 ± 7.5% (mean ± asymptotic standard error) for serum TXB 2 , 39.3 ± 6.8% for urinary 11-dehydro TXB 2 , 4.4 ± 7.7% for arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation, 40.4 ± 7.1% for ADP-induced platelet aggregation, 26.3 ± 9.2% for the VerifyNow Aspirin Assay®, and 45.0 ± 10.9% for the TEG® PlateletMapping ™ System with arachidonic acid. Spearman rank order correlations were highly significant for comparisons between assays when both pre-aspirin and post-aspirin results were included in the analysis. However, residual serum TXB 2 levels post-aspirin treatment were not significantly associated with post-treatment results of any of the other assays. Platelet count correlated with pre-aspirin serum TXB 2 and VerifyNow Aspirin Assay, but not with any post-aspirin platelet function test. Conclusions: Aspirin “resistance” (i.e. hyporesponsiveness to aspirin in a laboratory test) is in part unrelated to aspirin but is the result of underlying platelet hyperreactivity prior to the institution of aspirin therapy. Individuals identified as aspirin “resistant” defined by serum TXB 2 are not the same individuals identified by the other tests.

Download Full-text

A new platelet function test

Thrombosis Research ◽

10.1016/0049-3848(90)90173-a ◽

1990 ◽

Vol 58 (2) ◽

pp. 163-173 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Wayne L. Ryan ◽

Kay Hakenkamp ◽

Erin Sullivan

Keyword(s):

Platelet Function ◽

Platelet Function Test ◽

Function Test

Download Full-text

The impact of renal function on platelet reactivity and clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting

Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1160/th14-04-0302 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 112 (12) ◽

pp. 1174-1181 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Nicoline Breet ◽

Corine de Jong ◽

Willem Jan Bos ◽

Jochem van Werkum ◽

Heleen Bouman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Function ◽

Antiplatelet Therapy ◽

Platelet Function ◽

Platelet Reactivity ◽

Light Transmittance ◽

Clinical Trial Registration ◽

Platelet Function Test ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Function Test ◽

The Impact

SummaryPatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Previous studies have suggested that patients with CKD have less therapeutic benefit of antiplatelet therapy. However, the relation between renal function and platelet reactivity is still under debate. On-treatment platelet reactivity was determined in parallel by ADP- and AA-induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow® System (P2Y12 and Aspirin) in 988 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, undergoing elective coronary stenting. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of moderate/severe CKD (GFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m2). Furthermore, the incidence of all-cause death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and stroke at one-year was evaluated. Patients with CKD (n=180) had significantly higher platelet reactivity, regardless of the platelet function test used. Patients with CKD more frequently had high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HCPR) and high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) regardless of the platelet function test used. After adjustment for potential confounders, this was no longer significant. The event-rate was the highest in patients with both high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and CKD compared to those with neither high on-treatment platelet reactivity nor CKD. In conclusion, the magnitude of platelet reactivity as well as the incidence of HPR was higher in patients with CKD. However, since the incidence of HPR was similar after adjustment, a higher rate of co-morbidities in patients with CKD might be the major cause for this observation rather than CKD itself. CKD-patients with HCPR were at the highest risk of long-term cardiovascular events.Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00352014.

Download Full-text