scholarly journals Details of the Use of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in Comorbid Patients. Ways to Minimise the Risks of NSAID-induced GIT Complications

Doctor Ru ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
I.G. Pakhomova ◽  
◽  
G.Yu. Knorring ◽  
◽  

Objective of the Review: to discuss the most common adverse events from the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) for GIT: NSAID-induced esophago-, gastroduodeno- and enteropathy, possible management and the use of various therapies in order to minimize the risks of this pathology. Key Points. NSAIDs are efficient analgetics and anti-inflammatory products widely used in clinical setting. NSAIDs are prescribed mostly to patients with chronic joint and spine conditions. As a lot of patients who take NSAIDs are comorbid, they have frequent adverse reactions to drugs, including NSAIDs, and need stricter control if this is a therapy of choice. Selective NSAIDs (nimesulide) are characterised by good bioavailability; they are efficient pain killers, possess marked anti-inflammatory properties and are relatively safe, thus making it possible to minimise the rate of adverse reactions for GIT. Conclusion. It should be emphasised that the issue of NSAID-induced GIT disorders is still challenging and can be aggravated in comorbid patients. Of prime importance are timely prevention and diagnosis of NSAID-induced GIT disorders and sustainable and individuated NSAID prescription. Keywords: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, comorbidity, NSAID-induced gastroduodenopathy, NSAID-induced enteropathy, nimesulide, Nise

Author(s):  
M. L. Maksimov ◽  
N. M. Kiseleva ◽  
D. G. Semenikhin ◽  
B. K. Romanov

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are included in a pharmacological group of drugs with different chemical structures providing anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic actions, as well as antiplatelet action to a certain degree. Unfortunately, NSAIDs can cause a wide range of adverse reactions (AR) posing a serious risk to the health and life of patients. Therefore, the rational use of NSAIDs should include methods for effective prevention of drug complications. Many NSAIDs have a pronounced therapeutic effect, simultaneously causing many undesirable effects, so the drug shall be chosen considering the development of predicted side effects and modern algorithms. According to clinical recommendations, risk factors and administration of safer NSAIDs shall be considered as the main prevention method. Besides, it is possible to protect the patient from the upper gastrointestinal tract complications using proton pump inhibitors. It should be noted that there are no effective medication methods for kidney and liver protection to reduce the risk of NSAID-associated complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
V.B. Vasilyuk ◽  
◽  
G.I. Syraeva ◽  
M.V. Faraponova ◽  
◽  
...  

Gout is one of the most common forms of inflammatory arthritis. Medical care for gout includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This paper reviews the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs prescribed for the acute attack of gout, in particular, AMBENIUM® parenteral. It was demonstrated that phenylbutazone is a powerful NSAID that provides significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Considering a broad spectrum of adverse reactions of NSAIDs, these agents should be prescribed and used under in-depth analysis of patient’s condition, comorbidities and the level of their decompensation, and potential drug interactions. In addition, optimal dosages and duration of NSAID treatment are of particular importance. The authors conclude that AMBENIUM® parenteral is an effective and safe therapeutic modality for gout. Its profile and risk/benefit ratio are regarded as “favorable” compared to other NSAIDs. KEYWORDS: gout, arthritis, pain, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, parenteral, efficacy, safety. FOR CITATION: Vasilyuk V.B., Syraeva G.I., Faraponova M.V. Efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute attack of gout. Russian Medical Inquiry. 2021;5(2):96–101. DOI: 10.32364/2587-6821-2021-5-2-96-101.


10.36469/9865 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadir Hammoumraoui ◽  
Sid Ahmed Kherraf ◽  
Joaquin Mould-Quevedo ◽  
Tarek A. Ismail

Background: Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib are as effective as non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ns-NSAIDs) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), have fewer gastrointestinal side effects, but are more expensive. Objective: To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of celecoxib versus ns-NSAIDs, with/without proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) co-therapy, for treating OA in Algeria. Methods: The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) health economic model from UK, updated with relative risks of adverse events using CONDOR trial data, was adapted for costeffectiveness analysis in OA patients aged ≥65 years. Patients could initiate treatment with celecoxib or ns-NSAIDs with/without omeprazole. Conditional probabilities were obtained from published clinical trials; effectiveness measure was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained/patient. The analysis was conducted from a healthcare payer’s perspective. The average daily treatment costs and frequencies of resource use for adverse events were based on data collected in August 2011 from a private clinic located in Cheraga, Algiers, Algeria. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). Results: QALYs gained/patient over a 6-month horizon were higher with celecoxib (0.368) and celecoxib+PPI (0.40) versus comparators. The lowest expected cost/patient was associated with ibuprofen (US$134.76 versus US$175.67 with celecoxib+PPI, and US$177.57 with celecoxib). Celecoxib+PPI was the most cost-effective drug treatment, with an ICER of US$584.43, versus ibuprofen. Treatment with celecoxib alone showed an ICER of US$1,530.56 versus diclofenac+PPI. These ICERs are <1 gross domestic product per capita in Algeria (US$7,500). Over 1-year, 3-year and 5-year horizons, celecoxib with/without PPI co-therapy showed higher QALYs/patient versus comparators, and decreasing ICERs. The ICER of celecoxib+PPI was lower than that of comparators over all time horizons. These findings were confirmed with CEACs generated via PSA. Conclusion: Using data from a single private clinic in Cheraga, Algiers, Algeria, and after considering new adverse event risks, we showed that celecoxib with/without PPI co therapy is more cost-effective than ns-NSAID+PPI for treating OA patients aged ≥65 years. Celecoxib+PPI remains dominant over a 5-year horizon, making it the most cost-effective treatment option for medium- and long-term use.


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Ghada Al Qassim ◽  
Vimalarani Arulselvam ◽  
Suad R Al Amer ◽  
Salah Al Ghanem ◽  
Neale Nicola Kalis

Coronavirus disease 201 9 (COVID - 1 9 ) vaccination for children over 12 years of age began on May 2021 in the kingdom of Bahrain. Very limited data is available regarding the adverse events related to COVID -19 vaccination in children. This is a case report of a 12-year-old previously healthy boy with acute myopericarditis who presented on day 5 after the first dose of Pfizer COVID - 19 vaccination. Other causes of acute myopericarditis were ruled out. He was treated with non - steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and recovered fully. This case of vaccine-induced myocarditis was reported to the national task force of Bahrain for combating COVID - 19.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 943-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Say Lee Pok ◽  
Fatiha Hana Shabaruddin ◽  
Maznah Dahlui ◽  
Sargunan Sockalingam ◽  
Mohd Shahrir Mohamed Said ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document