scholarly journals Endovascular treatment of blister aneurysms

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey W. Peitz ◽  
Christopher A. Sy ◽  
Ramesh Grandhi
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Cerebrovascular Lesions ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Treatment Methods ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion ◽  
Open Surgical Treatment ◽  
Reconstructive Methods

Blister aneurysms are rare cerebrovascular lesions for which the treatment methods are reviewed here, with a focus on endovascular options. The reported pathogenesis of blister aneurysms varies, and hemodynamic stress, arterial dissection, and arteriosclerotic ulceration have all been described. There is consensus on the excessive fragility of blister aneurysms and their parent vessels, which makes clipping technically difficult. Open surgical treatment is associated with high rates of complications, morbidity, and mortality; endovascular treatment is a promising alternative. Among endovascular treatment options, deconstructive treatment has been associated with higher morbidity compared with reconstructive methods such as direct embolization, stent- or balloon-assisted direct embolization, stent monotherapy, and flow diversion. Flow diversion has been associated with higher technical success rates and similar clinical outcomes compared with non–flow diverting treatment methods. However, delayed aneurysm occlusion and the need for antiplatelet therapy are potential drawbacks to flow diversion that must be considered when choosing among treatment methods for blister aneurysms.

Reconstructive endovascular treatment of basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: A multi-centre experience and literature review

2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092110428
Author(s):  
Hanna Styczen ◽  
Sebastian Fischer ◽  
Matthias Gawlitza ◽  
Lukas Meyer ◽  
Lukas Goertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Complete Occlusion ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion ◽  
Complications Rate ◽  
Woven Endobridge

Background Data on outcome after endovascular treatment of basilar artery fenestration aneurysms (BAFAs) is limited. This study presents our multi-centre experience of BAFAs treated by different reconstructive techniques including coils, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), flow diversion and intra-saccular flow disruption with the Woven Endobridge (WEB). Methods Retrospective analysis of 38 BAFAs treated endovascularly between 2003 and 2020. The primary endpoint was complete aneurysm obliteration defined as Raymond–Roy occlusion classification (RROC) I on immediate and follow-up (FU) angiography. The secondary endpoints were procedure-related complications, rate of re-treatment, and clinical outcome. Results Endovascular treatment was feasible in 36/38 aneurysms (95%). The most frequent strategy was coiling (21/36, 58%), followed by SAC (7/36, 19%), WEB embolization (6/36, 17%) and flow diversion (2/36, 6%). A successful aneurysm occlusion (defined as RROC 1 and 2) on the final angiogram was achieved in 30/36 (83%) aneurysms including all patients presenting with baseline subarachnoid haemorrhage and 25/36 (69%) were occluded completely. Complete occlusion (RROC 1) was more frequently achieved in ruptured BAFAs (15/25, 60% v. 2/11, 18%; p = 0.031). Procedure-related complications occurred in 3/36 (8%) aneurysms. Re-treatment was executed in 12/36 (33%) aneurysms. After a median angiography FU of 38 months, 30/31 (97%) BAFAs were occluded successfully and 25/31 (81%) showed complete occlusion. Conclusion Reconstructive endovascular treatment of BAFAs is technically feasible with a good safety profile. Although in some cases re-treatment was necessary, a high rate of final aneurysm occlusion was achieved.

Endovascular treatment of previously clipped aneurysms: continued evolution of hybrid neurosurgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley A Gross ◽  
Felipe C Albuquerque ◽  
Karam Moon ◽  
Andrew F Ducruet ◽  
Cameron G McDougall
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Digital Subtraction ◽  
Narrow Neck ◽  
Neurological Morbidity ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion ◽  
Digital Subtraction Angiographic ◽  
Therapy Treatment

Background/objectiveThe optimal management of residual or recurrent clipped aneurysms is infrequently addressed in the literature.MethodsWe reviewed our endovascular database from January 1998 to May 2016 to identify patients with clipped aneurysms undergoing subsequent endovascular treatment, evaluating treatment approach, and clinical and angiographic outcomes.Results60 patients underwent endovascular treatment of residual/recurrent clipped aneurysms; 7 rebled prior to endovascular therapy. Treatment was via coiling alone (n=25, 42%), stent assisted coiling (n=15, 25%), balloon assisted coiling (n=8, 13%), flow diversion (n=8, 13%), stenting alone (n=3, 5%), or flow diversion with coiling (n=1, 2%). The procedural permanent neurological morbidity and mortality rates were 3% and 2%, respectively. Over a clinical follow-up of 253.4 patient years (median 3.9 years), there was one rebleed in a patient who had declined further treatment. For 43 patients with at least 1 month of digital subtraction angiographic follow-up (median 3.4 years), complete aneurysm occlusion was seen in 79% of cases. Neck remnants were observed in 14%, and stable small dome remnants were observed in 7% of cases. In a subgroup of 18 patients with ‘clip induced’ narrow neck aneurysms, all domes were initially coil occluded (Raymond 1 or 2); there was no permanent procedural morbidity and no aneurysms required retreatment or recanalized over a median follow-up of 3.9 years.ConclusionsEndovascular treatment of residual or recurrent clipped aneurysms is an excellent treatment approach in well selected patients; ‘clip induced’ narrow neck aneurysms fare particularly well after treatment both angiographically and clinically.

scholarly journals The Evolution and Role of the Bursal Acromial Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 263502542110013
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Curtis ◽  
W. Michael Pullen ◽  
Kevin Helenius ◽  
Michael T. Freehill
Keyword(s):  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Subacromial Space ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Diagnostic Arthroscopy ◽  
Superior Capsular Reconstruction

Background: Massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs) remain a challenging clinical problem with numerous described treatment options. Bursal acromial reconstruction (BAR) represents a promising and evolving technique for a subset of patients with irreparable RCTs. Indications: BAR is indicated for patients with massive, irreparable RCTs with a primary complaint of pain, well-compensated shoulder function, and minimal radiographic degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint as an alternative to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty or superior capsular reconstruction. Technique Description: Positioning per surgeon preference and diagnostic arthroscopy is performed. Subacromial decompression with a minimal and gentle acromioplasty is performed, followed by assessment of RCT repairability. If the tear is deemed irreparable, acromial measurements in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions are obtained. Two pieces of acellular dermal allograft are cut to the acromial dimensions and affixed together using fibrin glue. The reactive side (facing the acromion), medial, and anterior sides of the graft are labeled. Two suture tapes are passed through the corners of the graft and self-locked and run diagonally in a cruciate configuration using an antegrade suture passer. Medial and lateral #2 fiberwire sutures are placed in a luggage-tag configuration. Neviaser (posterior), middle, and anterior acromioclavicular joint portals are created for medial sided suture passage. Medial graft sutures are shuttled through the respective medial portals and the graft is pulled into the subacromial space. The lateral sutures are then removed from percutaneous posterolateral, middle lateral, and anterolateral portals along the acromial edge. Medial sutures are retrieved using a suture grasper subcutaneously on top of the acromion through the percutaneous lateral portals. The sutures are tied through the lateral portals, starting with the medial-lateral sutures, and the knots are buried. Postoperatively, patients are progressed through passive, active-assisted, and active range of motion between weeks 2 and 6 and strengthening is progressed at 6 weeks. Results: Clinical results are lacking in the literature, but anecdotal results in our institution have demonstrated promising early outcomes. Discussion/Conclusion: BAR represents a promising alternative in the array of surgical options for treatment of irreparable RCTs.

125 Staged Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Acute Coiling Followed By Delayed Flow Diversion

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Erick Michael Westbroek ◽  
Matthew Bender ◽  
Narlin B Beaty ◽  
Bowen Jiang ◽  
Risheng Xu AB ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Coil Embolization ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Major Complication Rate ◽  
Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

Abstract INTRODUCTION ISAT demonstrated that coiling is effective for aneurysm treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); however, complete occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms frequently requires adjuvants relatively contraindicated in SAH. As such, a limited “dome occlusive” strategy is often pursued in the setting of SAH. We report a single institution series of coiling of acutely ruptured aneurysms followed by delayed flow diversion for definitive, curative occlusion. METHODS A prospectively collected IRB-approved database was screened for patients with aneurysmal SAH who were initially treated by coil embolization followed by planned flow diversion at a single academic medical institution. Peri-procedural outcomes, complications, and angiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS >50 patients underwent both acute coiling followed by delayed, planned flow diversion. Average aneurysm size on initial presentation was 9.5 mm. Common aneurysm locations included Pcomm (36%), Acomm (30%), MCA (10%), ACA (10%), and vertebral (5%). Dome occlusion was achieved in all cases following initial coiling. Second-stage implantation of a flow diverting stent was achieved in 49/50 cases (98%). Follow-up angiography was available for 33/50 patients (66%), with mean follow-up of 11 months. 27 patients (82%) had complete angiographic occlusion at last follow up. All patients with residual filling at follow-up still had dome occlusion. There were no mortalities (0%). Major complication rate for stage I coiling was 2% (1 patient with intra-procedural aneurysm re-rupture causing increase in a previous ICH). Major complication rate for stage 2 flow diversion was 2% (1 patient with ischemic stroke following noncompliance with dual antiplatelet regimen). Minor complications occurred in 2 additional patients (4%) with transient neurological deficits. CONCLUSION Staged endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with acute dome-occlusive coil embolization followed by delayed flow diversion is a safe and effective treatment strategy.

scholarly journals Very delayed discontinuation of telescoped Pipeline embolization devices: a case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-186
Author(s):  
Manoj Bohara ◽  
Kosuke Teranishi ◽  
Kenji Yatomi ◽  
Takashi Fujii ◽  
Takayuki Kitamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Pipeline Embolization Device ◽  
Complete Occlusion ◽  
Radiological Features ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Aneurysm Occlusion

Background Flow diversion with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) is a widely accepted treatment modality for aneurysm occlusion. Previous reports have shown no recanalization of aneurysms on long-term follow-up once total occlusion has been achieved. Case description We report on a 63-year-old male who had a large internal carotid artery cavernous segment aneurysm. Treatment with PED resulted in complete occlusion of the aneurysm. However, follow-up angiography at four years revealed recurrence of the aneurysm due to disconnection of the two PEDs placed in telescoping fashion. Conclusion Herein, we present the clinico-radiological features and discuss the possible mechanisms resulting in the recanalization of aneurysms treated with flow diversion.

Endovascular Advances for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S74-S82 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Webster Crowley ◽  
Andrew F. Ducruet ◽  
Cameron G. McDougall ◽  
Felipe C. Albuquerque
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Cerebral Avms ◽  
Brain Avms ◽  
The Brain ◽  
The Way

Abstract Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the brain represent unique challenges for treating physicians. Although these lesions have traditionally been treated with surgical resection alone, advancements in endovascular and radiosurgical therapies have greatly expanded the treatment options for patients harboring brain AVMs. Perhaps no subspecialty within neurosurgery has seen as many advancements over a relatively short period of time as the endovascular field. A number of these endovascular innovations have been designed primarily for cerebral AVMs, and even those advancements that are not particular to AVMs have resulted in substantial changes to the way cerebral AVMs are treated. These advancements have enabled the embolization of cerebral AVMs to be performed either as a stand-alone treatment, or in conjunction with surgery or radiosurgery. Perhaps nothing has impacted the treatment of brain AVMs as substantially as the development of liquid embolics, most notably Onyx and n-butyl cyanoacrylate. However, of near-equal impact has been the innovations seen in the catheters that help deliver the liquid embolics to the AVMs. These developments include flow-directed catheters, balloon-tipped catheters, detachable-tipped catheters, and distal access catheters. This article aims to review some of the more substantial advancements in the endovascular treatment of brain AVMs and to discuss the literature surrounding the expanding indications for endovascular treatment of these lesions.

Endovascular Treatment of Bilateral Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Presenting With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons75-ons81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Sam Shin ◽  
Byung Moon Kim ◽  
Se-Hyuk Kim ◽  
Sang Hyun Suh ◽  
Chang Woo Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Treatment Methods ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Endovascular Methods ◽  
Dissecting Aneurysms

Abstract BACKGROUND: Optimal management of bilateral vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (bi-VDAs) causing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment methods and outcomes of bi-VDA causing SAH. METHODS: Seven patients were treated endovascularly for bi-VDA causing SAH. Treatment methods and outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Two patients were treated with 2 overlapping stents for both ruptured and unruptured VDAs, 2 with 2 overlapping stents and coiling for ruptured VDA and with conservative treatment for unruptured VDA, 1 with internal trapping (IT) for ruptured VDA and stent-assisted coiling for unruptured VDA, 1 with IT for ruptured VDA and 2 overlapping stents for unruptured VDA, and 1 with IT for ruptured VDA and a single stent for unruptured VDA. None had rebleeding during follow-up (range, 15-48 months). All patients had favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2). On follow-up angiography at 6 to 36 months, 9 treated and 2 untreated VDAs revealed stable or improved state, whereas 3 VDAs in 2 patients showed regrowth. Of the 3 recurring VDAs, 1 was initially treated with IT but recurred owing to retrograde flow to the ipsilateral posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), the second was treated with single stent but enlarged, and the last was treated with 2 overlapping stents and coiling but recurred from the remnant sac harboring the PICA origin. All 3 recurred VDAs were retreated with coiling with or without stent insertion. CONCLUSION: Bilateral VDAs presenting with SAH were safely treated with endovascular methods. However, endovascular treatment may be limited for VDAs with PICA origin involvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document