Axillary nerve repair by triceps motor branch transfer through an axillary access: anatomical basis and clinical results

2007 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 370-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayme Augusto Bertelli ◽  
Paulo Roberto Kechele ◽  
Marcos Antonio Santos ◽  
Hamilton Duarte ◽  
Marcos Flávio Ghizoni
Keyword(s):  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Nerve Repair ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Surgical Anatomy ◽  
Motor Branch ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
Anatomical Basis ◽  
Long Head

Object Grafting or nerve transfers to the axillary nerve have been performed using a deltopectoral approach and/or a posterior arm approach. In this report, the surgical anatomy of the axillary nerve was studied with the goal of repairing the nerve through an axillary access. Methods The axillary nerve was bilaterally dissected in 10 embalmed cadavers to study its variations. Three patients with axillary nerve injuries then underwent surgical repair through an axillary access; the axillary nerve was repaired by transfer of the triceps long head motor branch. Results At the lateral margin of the subscapularis muscle, the axillary nerve was found in the center of a triangle bounded medially by the subscapular artery, laterally by the latissimus dorsi tendon, and cephalad by the posterior circumflex humeral artery. At the entrance of the quadrangular space, the axillary nerve divisions were loosely connected to each other, and could be clearly separated and correctly identified. Surgery for the axillary nerve repair through the axillary access was straightforward. Eighteen months after surgery, all three patients had recovered deltoid strength to a score of M4 on the Medical Research Council scale and had improved abduction strength by 50%. No deficit was evident in elbow extension. Conclusions The axillary nerve and its branches can be safely dissected and repaired by triceps motor nerve transfer through an axillary access.

Triceps Motor Nerve Branches as a Donor or Receiver in Nerve Transfers

2007 ◽  
Vol 61 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. ONS333-ONS339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayme A. Bertelli ◽  
Marcos A. Santos ◽  
Paulo R. Kechele ◽  
Marcos F. Ghizoni ◽  
Hamilton Duarte
Keyword(s):  
Radial Nerve ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Motor Branch ◽  
Medial Head ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
Axillary Region ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Lateral Head

AbstractObjective:The pattern of triceps innervation is complex and, as yet, has not been fully elucidated. The purposes of this study were 1) to clarify the anatomy of the triceps motor branches, and 2) to evaluate their possible uses as a donor or receiver for nerve transfer.Methods:The radial nerve and its motor and cutaneous branches were bilaterally dissected from the axilla and posterior arm regions of 10 embalmed cadavers.Results:A single branch innervates the triceps long head, whereas double innervation was identified for the lateral and medial heads. The upper branch to the lateral head originated from the radial nerve, whereas the lower branch to the lateral head stemmed from the lower medial head motor branch, which ultimately innervated the anconeus muscle. Both the long head and the upper medial head motor branches originated in the axillary region in the vicinity of the latissimus dorsi tendon.Conclusion:Each of the triceps’ motor branches might be used as a donor for transfer. The triceps long head motor branch should be used preferentially when the intention is to establish triceps reinnervation.

Anterior Interosseous–to–Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfers: A Single Center’s Experience in Restoring Intrinsic Hand Function

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472092848
Author(s):  
Graham J. McLeod ◽  
Blair R. Peters ◽  
Tanis Quaife ◽  
Tod A. Clark ◽  
Jennifer L. Giuffre
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
No Donor ◽  
Motor Branch ◽  
Nerve Transfers

Background: Transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) into the ulnar motor branch improves intrinsic hand function in patients with high ulnar nerve injuries. We report our outcomes of this nerve transfer and hypothesize that any improvement in intrinsic hand function is beneficial to patients. Methods: A retrospective review of all AIN-to-ulnar motor nerve transfers, including both supercharged end-to-side (SETS) and end-to-end (ETE) transfers, from 2011 to 2018 performed by 2 surgeons was conducted. All adult patients who underwent this nerve transfer for any reason with greater than 6 months’ follow-up and completed charts were included. Primary outcome measures were motor function using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system and subjective satisfaction with surgery using a visual analog scale. Secondary outcome measures included complications and donor site deficits. Results: Of the 57 patients who underwent nerve transfer, 32 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up and average time to surgery were 12 and 15.6 months, respectively. The overall average BMRC score was 2.9/5, with a trend toward better recovery in patients who received earlier surgery (<12 months = BMRC 3.7, ≥12 months = BMRC 2.2; P < .01). Patients with an SETS transfer had better results that those with an ETE transfer (SETS = 3.2, ETE = 2.6). There were no donor deficits after operation. One patient developed complex regional pain syndrome. Conclusions: Patients with earlier surgery and an in-continuity nerve (receiving an SETS transfer) showed improved recovery with a higher BMRC grade compared with those who underwent later surgery. Any improvements in intrinsic hand function would be beneficial to patients.

Double-Nerve Transfer to the Axillary Nerve in Traumatic Upper Trunk Brachial Plexus Injuries Using an Axillary Approach: Anatomical Description and Preliminary Case Series

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. E131-E139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibault Lafosse ◽  
Thibault Gerosa ◽  
Julien Serane ◽  
Michael Bouyer ◽  
Emmanuel H Masmejean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Motor Branch ◽  
Axillary Approach ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
Teres Minor

Abstract BACKGROUND Restoration of shoulder external rotation remains challenging in patients with C5/C6 brachial plexus injuries (BPI). OBJECTIVE To describe a double-nerve transfer to the axillary nerve (AN), targeting both its anterior and posterior motor branches, through an axillary route. METHODS A total of 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric brachial plexuses were dissected. Using an axillary approach, the infraclavicular brachial plexus terminal branches were exposed, including the axillary, ulnar, and radial nerves. Under microscopic magnification, the triceps long head motor branch (TLHMB), anteromedial fascicles of the ulnar nerve (UF), the anterior motor branch of the axillary nerve (AAMB), and the teres minor motor branch (TMMB) were dissected and transected to simulate 2 nerve transfers, THLMB-AAMB and UF-TMMB. Several anatomical criteria were assessed, including the overlaps between fascicles when placed side-by-side. Six patients with C5/C6 BPI were then operated on using this technique. RESULTS TLHMB-AAMB and UF-TMMB transfers could be simulated in all specimens, with mean overlaps of 37.1 mm and 6.5 mm, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 23 mo, all patients had recovered grade-3 strength or more in the deltoid and teres minor muscles. Mean active shoulder flexion, abduction, and external rotation with the arm 90° abducted were of 128°, 117°, and 51°, respectively. No postoperative motor deficit was found in the UF territory. CONCLUSION A double-nerve transfer, based on radial and ulnar fascicles, appears to be an adequate option to reanimate both motor branches of the AN, providing satisfactory shoulder active elevations and external rotation in C5/C6 BPI patients.

scholarly journals Outcome of double nerve transfer close to target muscle both for shoulder abduction and elbow flexion in early C5 –C6 Brachial Plexus injury.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (07) ◽  
pp. 1442-1447
Author(s):  
Husnain Khan ◽  
Muhammad Shafique ◽  
Zahid Iqbal Bhatti ◽  
Tehseen Ahmad Cheema
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Brachial Plexus Injury ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Motor Branch ◽  
Nerve Transfers

Adult brachial plexus injury is a now a common problem due to high incidence of motorbike accidents. Among all types, C 5 and C6 (upper brachial plexus injury) is the most common. If the patient present within 6 months then nerve transfer is the preferred treatment. However, there are different options for nerve transfer and different approaches for surgery. Objectives: The objective of the study was to share our experience of nerve transfer close to target muscles in upper brachial plexus injury. Study Design: Quaisi experimental study. Setting: National Orthopaedic Hospital, Bahawalpur. Period: January 2015 to June 2018. Material & Methods: Total 32 patients were operated with isolated C5 and C6 injury. In all patients four nerve transfers were done. For shoulder abduction posterior approach was used and accessory to suprascapular nerve and one of motor branch of radial to axillary nerve were transferred. Modified Oberlin transfer was done for elbow flexion. Both shoulder abduction and elbow flexion was graded according to medical research council grading system. Results: After one year follow up more than 75% of the patients showed good to normal shoulder abduction and 87.50% showed good to normal elbow flexion. Residual Median nerve damage was noted only in two patients (6.25%). Conclusion: If there is no evidence of recovery up to three months early nerve transfer should be considered, ideal time is 3-6 months. Nerve transfer close to target muscle yields superior results. The shoulder stabilizers and abductors should ideally be innervated by double nerve transfer through posterior approach. Similarly double fascicular transfer (modified Oberlin) should be done for elbow flexion.

Nerve transfers for peripheral nerve injury in the upper limb

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (2) ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Isaacs ◽  
A. R. Cochran
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Nerve Repair ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
Sensory Recovery ◽  
Potential Benefits

Nerve transfer has become a common and often effective reconstructive strategy for proximal and complex peripheral nerve injuries of the upper limb. This case-based discussion explores the principles and potential benefits of nerve transfer surgery and offers in-depth discussion of several established and valuable techniques including: motor transfer for elbow flexion after musculocutaneous nerve injury, deltoid reanimation for axillary nerve palsy, intrinsic re-innervation following proximal ulnar nerve repair, and critical sensory recovery despite non-reconstructable median nerve lesions.

Reconstruction of the spinal accessory nerve with selective fascicular nerve transfer of the upper trunk

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes A. Mayer ◽  
Laura A. Hruby ◽  
Stefan Salminger ◽  
Gerd Bodner ◽  
Oskar C. Aszmann
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Nerve Repair ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Spinal Accessory Nerve ◽  
Accessory Nerve ◽  
Nerve Function ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Spinal Accessory ◽  
Active Range Of Motion

OBJECTIVESpinal accessory nerve palsy is frequently caused by iatrogenic damage during neck surgery in the posterior triangle of the neck. Due to late presentation, treatment regularly necessitates nerve grafts, which often results in a poor outcome of trapezius function due to long regeneration distances. Here, the authors report a distal nerve transfer using fascicles of the upper trunk related to axillary nerve function for reinnervation of the trapezius muscle.METHODSFive cases are presented in which accessory nerve lesions were reconstructed using selective fascicular nerve transfers from the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. Outcomes were assessed at 20 ± 6 months (mean ± SD) after surgery, and active range of motion and pain levels using the visual analog scale were documented.RESULTSAll 5 patients regained good to excellent trapezius function (3 patients had grade M5, 2 patients had grade M4). The mean active range of motion in shoulder abduction improved from 55° ± 18° before to 151° ± 37° after nerve reconstruction. In all patients, unrestricted shoulder arm movement was restored with loss of scapular winging when abducting the arm. Average pain levels decreased from 6.8 to 0.8 on the visual analog scale and subsided in 4 of 5 patients.CONCLUSIONSRestoration of spinal accessory nerve function with selective fascicle transfers related to axillary nerve function from the upper trunk of the brachial plexus is a good and intuitive option for patients who do not qualify for primary nerve repair or present with a spontaneous idiopathic palsy. This concept circumvents the problem of long regeneration distances with direct nerve repair and has the advantage of cognitive synergy to the target function of shoulder movement.

scholarly journals Proof of concept for multiple nerve transfers to a single target muscle

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Luft ◽  
Johanna Klepetko ◽  
Silvia Muceli ◽  
Jaime Ibáñez ◽  
Vlad Tereshenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Entry Point ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
Prosthetic Control ◽  
Tension Free ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
Single Target ◽  
Motor Entry Point ◽  
Long Head

Surgical nerve transfers are used to efficiently treat peripheral nerve injuries, neuromas, phantom limb pain or improve bionic prosthetic control. Commonly, one donor nerve is transferred to one target muscle. However, the transfer of multiple nerves onto a single target muscle may increase the number of muscle signals for myoelectric prosthetic control and facilitate the treatment of multiple neuromas. Currently, no experimental models are available for multiple nerve transfers to a common target muscle in the upper extremity. This study describes a novel experimental model to investigate the neurophysiological effects of peripheral double nerve transfers. For this purpose, we developed a forelimb model to enable tension-free transfer of one or two donor nerves in the upper extremity. Anatomic dissections were performed to design the double nerve transfer model (n=8). In 62 male Sprague-Dawley rats the ulnar nerve of the antebrachium alone (n=30) or together with the anterior interosseus nerve (n=32) was transferred to reinnervate the long head of the biceps brachii. Before neurotization, the motor branch to the biceps’ long head was transected at the motor entry point and resected up to its original branch to prevent auto-reinnervation. In all animals, coaptation of both nerves to the motor entry point could be performed tension-free. Mean duration of the procedure was 49 ± 13 min for the single nerve transfer and 78 ± 20 min for the double nerve transfer. Twelve weeks after surgery, muscle response to neurotomy, behavioral testing, retrograde labeling and structural analyses were performed to assess reinnervation. These analyses indicated that all nerves successfully reinnervated the target muscle. No aberrant reinnervation was observed by the originally innervating nerve. Our observations suggest a minimal burden for the animal with no signs of functional deficit in daily activities or auto-mutilation in both procedures. Furthermore, standard neurophysiological analyses for nerve and muscle regeneration were applicable. This newly developed nerve transfer model allows for the reliable and standardized investigation of neural and functional changes following the transfer of multiple donor nerves to one target muscle.

Axillary Nerve Injury

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell A. Payne ◽  
Elias B. Rizk
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Sports Injuries ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Nerve Repair ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Nerve Grafting ◽  
Surgical Exploration ◽  
Direct Nerve

Axillary nerve injury has been associated with sports injuries, especially those involving anterior shoulder dislocation. The nerve injury leads to weakness of the deltoid and teres minor muscles, which impairs abduction and external rotation of the arm at the shoulder. Electrodiagnostic studies are helpful for determining extent of reinnervation and recovery after injury. In the absence of clinical or electrodiagnostic signs of recovery 3 to 6 months after injury, it is appropriate to offer surgical exploration. The options for surgical repair include direct nerve repair, nerve grafting, and nerve transfer. In appropriately selected individuals, outcomes are favorable.

Nerve transfers in the upper extremity following cervical spinal cord injury. Part 1: Systematic review of the literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 629-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jawad M. Khalifeh ◽  
Christopher F. Dibble ◽  
Anna Van Voorhis ◽  
Michelle Doering ◽  
Martin I. Boyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Elbow Extension ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
Finger Extension ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Upper Extremity Function

OBJECTIVEPatients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI)/tetraplegia consistently rank restoring arm and hand function as their top functional priority to improve quality of life. Motor nerve transfers traditionally used to treat peripheral nerve injuries are increasingly being used to treat patients with cervical SCIs. In this study, the authors performed a systematic review summarizing the published literature on nerve transfers to restore upper-extremity function in tetraplegia.METHODSA systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE 1946–, Embase 1947–, Scopus 1960–, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify relevant literature published through January 2019. The authors included studies that provided original patient-level data and extracted information on clinical characteristics, operative details, and strength outcomes after nerve transfer procedures. Critical review and synthesis of the articles were performed.RESULTSTwenty-two unique studies, reporting on 158 nerve transfers in 118 upper limbs of 92 patients (87 males, 94.6%) were included in the systematic review. The mean duration from SCI to nerve transfer surgery was 18.7 months (range 4 months–13 years) and mean postoperative follow-up duration was 19.5 months (range 1 month–4 years). The main goals of reinnervation were the restoration of thumb and finger flexion, elbow extension, and wrist and finger extension. Significant heterogeneity in transfer strategy and postoperative outcomes were noted among the reports. All but one case report demonstrated recovery of at least Medical Research Council grade 3/5 strength in recipient muscle groups; however, there was greater variation in the results of larger case series. The best, most consistent outcomes were demonstrated for restoration of wrist/finger extension and elbow extension.CONCLUSIONSMotor nerve transfers are a promising treatment option to restore upper-extremity function after SCI. Flexor reinnervation strategies show variable treatment effect sizes; however, extensor reinnervation may provide more consistent, meaningful recovery. Despite numerous published case reports describing good patient outcomes with nerve transfers, there remains a paucity in the literature regarding optimal timing and long-term clinical outcomes with these procedures.

Supercharged End-to-Side Anterior Interosseous to Ulnar Motor Nerve Transfer for Hirayama Disease: A Case Report

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110635
Author(s):  
Aleixo Abreu Tanure ◽  
Luis Guilherme Rosifini Alves Rezende ◽  
Ana Carolina Pazim ◽  
Marcel Leal Ribeiro
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Late Presentation ◽  
Hirayama Disease ◽  
Nerve Transfers ◽  
First Case

Hirayama disease is a rare condition of cervical myelopathy. Its early identification and correction can optimize functional outcomes. However, late presentation and some more severe cases may be associated with loss of hand function. Among the cases described, there are no reports of nerve transfers for this condition. We presented the first case report of a Hirayama disease of isolated ulnar nerve impairment managed with nerve transfer. Electroneuromyography showed isolated preganglionic involvement of C7, C8, and T1, with no sensory changes. The patient underwent nerve transfer with anterior interosseous nerve to ulnar nerve supercharge end-to-side, recovering hand function in 7 months.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document