Evaluation of suprascapular nerve neurotization after nerve graft or transfer in the treatment of brachial plexus traction lesions

2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn J. A. Malessy ◽  
Godard C. W. de Ruiter ◽  
Kees S. de Boer ◽  
Ralph T. W. M. Thomeer
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Muscle Power ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Deltoid Muscle ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the restoration of shoulder function by means of suprascapular nerve neurotization in adult patients with proximal C-5 and C-6 lesions due to a severe brachial plexus traction injury. The primary goal of brachial plexus reconstructive surgery was to restore biceps muscle function and, secondarily, to reanimate shoulder function. Methods. Suprascapular nerve neurotization was performed by grafting the C-5 nerve in 24 patients and by accessory or hypoglossal nerve transfer in 29 patients. Additional neurotization involving the axillary nerve was performed in 18 patients. Postoperative needle electromyography studies of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and deltoid muscles showed signs of reinnervation in most patients; however, active glenohumeral shoulder function recovery was poor. In nine (17%) of 53 patients supraspinatus muscle strength was Medical Research Council (MRC) Grade 3 or 4 and in four patients (8%) infraspinatus muscle power was MRC Grade 3 or 4. In 18 patients in whom deltoid muscle reinnervation was attempted, MRC Grade 3 or 4 function was demonstrated in two (11%). In the overall group, eight patients (15%) exhibited glenohumeral abduction with a mean of 44 ± 17° (standard deviation [SD]; median 45°) and four patients (8%) exhibited glenohumeral exorotation with a mean of 48 ± 24° (SD; median 53°). In only three patients (6%) were both functions regained. Conclusions. The reanimation of shoulder function in patients with proximal C-5 and C-6 brachial plexus traction injuries following suprascapular nerve neurotization is disappointingly low.

scholarly journals Evaluation of suprascapular nerve neurotization after nerve grafting or transfer in the treatment of brachial plexus traction lesions

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Martijn J. A. Malessy ◽  
Godard C. W. de Ruiter ◽  
Kees S. de Boer ◽  
Ralph T. W. M. Thomeer
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Muscle Power ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Deltoid Muscle ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Infraspinatus Muscle ◽  
Function Recovery ◽  
Grade 3

Object The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the restoration of shoulder function by means of supra-scapular nerve neurotization in adult patients with proximal C-5 and C-6 lesions due to a severe brachial plexus traction injury (BPTI). The primary goal of brachial plexus reconstructive surgery was to restore the biceps muscle function and, secondarily, to reanimate shoulder function. Methods Suprascapular nerve neurotization was performed by grafting the C-5 nerve in 24 patients and by accessory or hypoglossal nerve transfer in 29 patients. Additional neurotization involving the axillary nerve could be performed in 18 patients. Postoperative needle electromyography studies of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and deltoid muscles showed signs of reinnervation in most patients; however, active glenohumeral shoulder function recovery was poor. In nine (17%) of 53 patients supraspinatus muscle strength was Medical Research Council (MRC) Grade 3 or 4 and in four (8%) infraspinatus muscle power was Grade 3 or 4. In 18 patients in whom deltoid muscle reinnervation was attempted, MRC Grade 3 or 4 function was demonstrated in two (11%). In the overall group, eight patients (15%) exhibited glenohumeral abduction with a mean of 44 ± 17° (standard deviation [SD]) (median 45°) and four patients (8%) exhibited glenohumeral exorotation with a mean of 48 ± 24° (SD) (median 53°). In only three patients (6%) were both functions regained. Conclusions The reanimation of shoulder function in patients with proximal C-5 and C-6 BPTIs following supra-scapular nerve neurotization is disappointingly low.

Initial report on the limited value of hypoglossal nerve transfer to treat brachial plexus root avulsions

1999 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn J. A. Malessy ◽  
Carel F. E. Hoffmann ◽  
Ralph T. W. M. Thomeer
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Cranial Nerve ◽  
Hypoglossal Nerve ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Initial Report ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Tongue Movements ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
12Th Cranial Nerve ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Hypoglossal nerve (12th cranial nerve) transfer was performed to treat the sequelae of brachial plexus root avulsion in 12 adults and two infants, and the patients were followed to assess the effectiveness of the surgery.Methods. The 12th cranial nerve was transected at the base of the tongue, and a sural nerve graft was used to bridge the gap between the donor (12th) and recipient nerves: C-5 spinal, axillary, suprascapular, or musculocutaneous nerve. The mean graft length in adult patients was 15.75 ± 5.5 cm (± standard deviation, median 14.5 cm) and in the two infants the graft lengths were 7 and 8 cm, respectively. After a mean postoperative interval of 1138 ± 254 days, electromyographic examination of the target muscles showed tongue movement—related activity in all patients. Muscle force strength measured according to the Medical Research Council's guidelines, was Grade 3 or higher in 21% of patients. Contraction, however, could only be attained by tongue movements, and volitional control was not achieved.Conclusions. Although recovery of muscle strength was obtained by 12th cranial nerve transfer, the functional gain remained virtually nonexistent because central control was missing.

Use of intercostal nerves for neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve in infants with birth-related brachial plexus palsy

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehiko Kawabata ◽  
Toru Shibata ◽  
Yoshito Matsui ◽  
Natsuo Yasui
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Muscle Power ◽  
Musculocutaneous Nerve ◽  
Biceps Muscle ◽  
Brachial Plexus Palsy ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Intercostal Nerves ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The use of intercostal nerves (ICNs) for the neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) in adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus palsy has been well described. However, its use for brachial plexus palsy in infants has rarely been reported. The authors surgically created 31 ICN—MCN communications for birth-related brachial plexus palsy and present the surgical results. Methods. Thirty-one neurotizations of the MCN, performed using ICNs, were conducted in 30 patients with birth-related brachial plexus palsy. In most cases other procedures were combined to reconstruct all upper-extremity function. The mean patient age at surgery was 5.8 months and the mean follow-up period was 5.2 years. Intercostal nerves were transected 1 cm distal to the mammary line and their stumps were transferred to the axilla, where they were coapted directly to the MCN. Two ICNs were used in 26 cases and three ICNs in five cases. The power of the biceps muscle of the arm was rated Grade M4 in 26 (84%) of 31 patients. In the 12 patients who underwent surgery when they were younger than 5 months of age, all exhibited a grade of M4 (100%) in their biceps muscle power. These results are better than those previously reported in adults. Conclusions. Neurotization of the MCN by surgically connecting ICNs is a safe, reliable, and effective procedure for reconstruction of the brachial plexus in patients suffering from birth-related palsy.

Surgical interventions for traumatic lesions of the brachial plexus: a retrospective study of 134 cases

2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 614-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia A. Kandenwein ◽  
Thomas Kretschmer ◽  
Martin Engelhardt ◽  
Hans-Peter Richter ◽  
Gregor Antoniadis
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Louisiana State University ◽  
Surgical Measures ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nerve Surgery ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Surgical therapy for traumatic brachial plexus lesions is still a great challenge in the field of peripheral nerve surgery. The aim of this study was to present the results of different surgical interventions in patients with this lesion type. Methods. One hundred thirty-four patients with traumatic brachial plexus lesions underwent surgery between January 1991 and September 1999. In more than 50% of the patients, injury was caused by a motorbike accident. Patients underwent surgery a mean of 6.3 months posttrauma. The following surgical techniques were applied: neurolysis for nerve lesions in continuity (27 cases), grafting for lesions in discontinuity (149 cases), and neurotization for root avulsions (67 cases). Sixty-five patients were evaluated for at least 30 months (mean follow up 42.1 months) after surgery. Function was graded using the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center classification system. Only 2% of the patients had Grade 3 or better function preoperatively, increasing to 52% postoperatively. The effect of surgical measures on the functional results for different muscles were compared (supra- or infraspinatus, deltoid, biceps, and triceps muscles); the best results were obtained for biceps muscle function (57% of patients with Medical Research Council Grades M3–M5 function). Graft reconstruction yielded a better outcome than neurotization. Surgery within 5 months posttrauma clearly resulted in improved recovery of motor function compared with later interventions. Sural nerve grafts (monofascicular nerves) showed better results. Conclusions. The results of neurosurgical interventions for brachial plexus lesions are satisfactory, especially when the operation is performed between 3 and 6 months after trauma.

scholarly journals Outcome of double nerve transfer close to target muscle both for shoulder abduction and elbow flexion in early C5 –C6 Brachial Plexus injury.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (07) ◽  
pp. 1442-1447
Author(s):  
Husnain Khan ◽  
Muhammad Shafique ◽  
Zahid Iqbal Bhatti ◽  
Tehseen Ahmad Cheema
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Brachial Plexus Injury ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Motor Branch ◽  
Nerve Transfers

Adult brachial plexus injury is a now a common problem due to high incidence of motorbike accidents. Among all types, C 5 and C6 (upper brachial plexus injury) is the most common. If the patient present within 6 months then nerve transfer is the preferred treatment. However, there are different options for nerve transfer and different approaches for surgery. Objectives: The objective of the study was to share our experience of nerve transfer close to target muscles in upper brachial plexus injury. Study Design: Quaisi experimental study. Setting: National Orthopaedic Hospital, Bahawalpur. Period: January 2015 to June 2018. Material & Methods: Total 32 patients were operated with isolated C5 and C6 injury. In all patients four nerve transfers were done. For shoulder abduction posterior approach was used and accessory to suprascapular nerve and one of motor branch of radial to axillary nerve were transferred. Modified Oberlin transfer was done for elbow flexion. Both shoulder abduction and elbow flexion was graded according to medical research council grading system. Results: After one year follow up more than 75% of the patients showed good to normal shoulder abduction and 87.50% showed good to normal elbow flexion. Residual Median nerve damage was noted only in two patients (6.25%). Conclusion: If there is no evidence of recovery up to three months early nerve transfer should be considered, ideal time is 3-6 months. Nerve transfer close to target muscle yields superior results. The shoulder stabilizers and abductors should ideally be innervated by double nerve transfer through posterior approach. Similarly double fascicular transfer (modified Oberlin) should be done for elbow flexion.

Surgical landmarks for the proximal portion of the axillary nerve

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 998-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Shane Tubbs ◽  
W. Jerry Oakes ◽  
Jeffrey P. Blount ◽  
Scott Elton ◽  
George Salter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Axillary Artery ◽  
Coracoid Process ◽  
Axillary Nerve ◽  
Proximal Portion ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pectoralis Minor ◽  
Human Cadavers ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The proximal segment of the axillary nerve (ANp) is often difficult to identify without extensive dissection deep into the axilla. The present study was performed to find reliable surgical landmarks for this nerve. Methods. Thirty dissections of human cadavers were performed to determine the relationships between the ANp and specific anatomical structures. The authors found that the ANp is consistently located within an anatomical triangle constructed by lines passing between the coracobrachialis and pectoralis minor muscles and the axillary artery. In addition, the ANp was routinely found 4 cm distal to the coracoid process of the scapula. Conclusions. These findings should assist the surgeon in locating the ANp during brachial plexus reconstruction.

Surgical repair of brachial plexus injury: a multinational survey of experienced peripheral nerve surgeons

2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan J. Belzberg ◽  
Michael J. Dorsi ◽  
Phillip B. Storm ◽  
John L. Moriarity
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Nerve Repair ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Medical Community ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fine Print

Object. Brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) are often devastating events that lead to upper-extremity paralysis, rendering the limb a painful extraneous appendage. Fortunately, there are several nerve repair techniques that provide restoration of some function. Although there is general agreement in the medical community concerning which patients may benefit from surgical intervention, the actual repair technique for a given lesion is less clear. The authors sought to identify and better define areas of agreement and disagreement among experienced peripheral nerve surgeons as to the management of BPIs. Methods. The authors developed a detailed survey in two parts: one part addressing general issues related to BPI and the other presenting four clinical cases. The survey was mailed to 126 experienced peripheral nerve physicians and 49 (39%) participated in the study. The respondents represent 22 different countries and multiple surgical subspecialties. They performed a mean of 33 brachial plexus reconstructions annually. Areas of significant disagreement included the timing and indications for surgical intervention in birth-related palsy, treatment of neuroma-in-continuity, the best transfers to achieve elbow flexion and shoulder abduction, the use of intra- or extraplexal donors for motor neurotization, and the use of distal or proximal coaptation during nerve transfer. Conclusions. Experienced peripheral nerve surgeons disagree in important ways as to the management of BPI. The decisions made by the various treating physicians underscore the many areas of disagreement regarding the treatment of BPI, including the diagnostic approach to defining the injury, timing of and indications for surgical intervention in birth-related palsy, the treatment of neuroma-in-continuity, the choice of nerve transfers to achieve elbow flexion and shoulder abduction, the use of intra- or extraplexal donors for neurotization, and the use of distal or proximal coaptation during nerve transfer.

Traumatic Suprascapular Nerve Injury at the Notch—A Reason for the Posterior Approach in Brachial Plexus Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (08) ◽  
pp. 592-595
Author(s):  
Marc Seifman ◽  
Scott Ferris
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Senior Author ◽  
Spinal Accessory Nerve ◽  
Accessory Nerve ◽  
Spinal Accessory

Background Optimal dynamic reconstruction of shoulder function requires a functional suprascapular nerve (SSN). Nerve transfer of the distal spinal accessory nerve (dSAN) to the SSN will in many cases restore very good supraspinatus and infraspinatus function. One potential cause of failure of this nerve transfer is an unrecognized more distal injury of the SSN. An anterior approach to this transfer does not allow for visualization of the nerve at the scapular notch which is a disadvantage when compared with a posterior approach to the SSN. Methods All patients of the senior author (S.F.) with traumatic brachial plexus injuries undergoing spinal accessory nerve to SSN transfer via the posterior approach were analyzed. Results Of the 58 patients, 11 (19.0%) demonstrated abnormal findings at the notch. In two of these 11 patients (18.2%), reconstruction was abandoned due to severe injury of the nerve. There was a higher rate of clavicular fractures in patients with SSN injuries at the notch, compared with no SSN injury at the notch (63.6 vs. 12.8%). Conclusion The dSAN to SSN transfer is a reliable reconstruction for restoration of shoulder external rotation and abduction. There is a high proportion of injuries to the nerve at the notch, which can be best appreciated from a posterior approach. The authors, therefore, advocate a posterior approach for this nerve transfer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document