scholarly journals Reducing Patient Radiation Dose during CT-Guided Procedures: Demonstration in Spinal Injections for Pain

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1776-1782 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M. Shepherd ◽  
C.P. Hess ◽  
C.T. Chin ◽  
R. Gould ◽  
W.P. Dillon
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
C. Teriitehau ◽  
H. Rabeh ◽  
E. Pessis ◽  
Q. Sénéchal ◽  
F. Besse ◽  
...  

To assess the impact of a computer assisted navigation system (CAN) (CT-Navigation™ IMACTIS, France) on patient radiation doses during percutaneous CT vertebroplasty a retrospective comparative trial was performed and included 37 patients requiring percutaneous vertebroplasty. This study was approved by CCN (Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France) ethical committee; all patients provided informed consent. All procedures were conducted in the interventional radiology department at CCN, by an experienced single radiologist using the same model and CT scan with identical parameters. The interventional dose length product (IDLP), representing the absorbed dose by the length of explored organs during the needle insertion phase, was compared in 15 consecutive patients who underwent a conventional procedure (CT control group), and in 22 patients who underwent CAN CT vertebroplasty (CAN group). The IDLP difference between the two groups was evaluated using Mann–Whitney U test. The median IDLP dose for the CAN group was 305.6 mGy.cm [182.3; 565.4], representing a reduction by a 3.2 factor compared with that of the conventional CT group (median 975.2 mGy.cm [568.3; 1077.1]; p < 0.001). The median procedure duration for the CAN group was 50 min [35; 60] vs. 100 min [82; 100] in the CT group (p < 0.001), representing a 50% reduction. In experienced hands, use of a CT-Navigation™ system (IMACTIS®) significantly reduced both patient radiation dose and procedure duration when compared to conventional CT guided percutaneous vertebroplasty.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juraj Artner ◽  
Friederike Lattig ◽  
Heiko Reichel ◽  
Balkan Cakir

Despite the good general patient acceptance, high patient comfort, safety and precision in the needle placement, exposure to radiation in computed tomography (CT)- guided spinal interventions remains a serious concern, and is often used to argue against its use. The aim of this study was to determine the technical possibilities of reducing the radiation dose in CT-guided epidural and periradicular injections in lumbar spine. We evaluated the possibilities of reducing radiation dose to the patient and operator during CT-guided injections on the lumbar spine using the following steps: significant reduction of the tube current and energy used for the topogram-acquisition, narrowing the area of interest in spiral CTmode and reduction of tube current and radiation energy in the final intervention mode. Fifty-three CT-guided spinal injections were performed in the lumbar spine (34 epidural lumbar, 19 lumbar periradicular) using a low-dose protocol in non-obese patients and compared with 1870 CT-guided injections from the year 2010, when a standard dose protocol was used. Technical considerations on radiation dose reduction were provided. An average dose reduction of 85% was achieved using the low-dose protocol in CTguided epidural and periradicular injections in lumbar spine without showing any effect on safety or precision.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
R. Ryan ◽  
R.H. Thornton ◽  
C.T. Sofocleous ◽  
J.P. Erinjeri ◽  
Q. Brian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 192-199
Author(s):  
Julia Rousseau ◽  
Serge Dreuil ◽  
Céline Bassinet ◽  
Sophie Cao ◽  
Hélène Elleaume

2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 903-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonari Sano ◽  
Hideyuki Matsutani ◽  
Takeshi Kondo ◽  
Takako Sekine ◽  
Takehiro Arai ◽  
...  

Atomic Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Tsovyanov ◽  
A. G. Sivenkov ◽  
V. E. Zhuravleva ◽  
V. V. Kosterev

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 2101-2109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara K Frisch ◽  
Karin Slebocki ◽  
Kamal Mammadov ◽  
Michael Puesken ◽  
Ingrid Becker ◽  
...  

Objective To evaluate the use of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) for CT-guided lung biopsy versus standard-dose CT (SDCT). Methods CT-guided lung biopsies from 115 patients (50 ULDCT, 65 SDCT) were analyzed retrospectively. SDCT settings were 120 kVp with automatic mAs modulation. ULDCT settings were 80 kVp with fixed exposure (20 mAs). Two radiologists evaluated image quality (i.e., needle artifacts, lesion contouring, vessel recognition, visibility of interlobar fissures). Complications and histological results were also evaluated. Results ULDCT was considered feasible for all lung interventions, showing the same diagnostic accuracy as SDCT. Its mean total radiation dose (dose–length product) was significantly reduced to 34 mGy-cm (SDCT 426 mGy-cm). Image quality and complication rates ( P = 0.469) were consistent. Conclusions ULDCT for CT-guided lung biopsies appears safe and accurate, with a significantly reduced radiation dose. We therefore recommend routine clinical use of ULDCT for the benefit of patients and interventionalists.


2011 ◽  
Vol 185 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Hoch ◽  
Jeremy Durack ◽  
Mathew Sorensen ◽  
Robert Gould ◽  
Marshall Stoller
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document