OIL SHALE PYROLYSIS IN FIXED-BED RETORT WITH DIFFERENT HEATING RATES

Oil Shale ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 139 ◽  
Author(s):  
O S AL-AYED ◽  
A AL-HARAHSHEH ◽  
A M KHALEEL ◽  
M AL-HARAHSHEH
2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-402
Author(s):  
RongCheng WU ◽  
Chun ZHANG ◽  
ZhengKang DUAN ◽  
GuangWen XU ◽  
HongJuan LI

RSC Advances ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (35) ◽  
pp. 21467-21474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanxin Lin ◽  
Dengguo Lai ◽  
Zhen Shi ◽  
Zhennan Han ◽  
Guangwen Xu

Variation of chemical species from pyrolysis with temperature, with light oil/diesel and VGO dominant at temperatures below 450 °C and above 300 °C.


2016 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 248-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somprasong Siramard ◽  
Lanxin Lin ◽  
Chun Zhang ◽  
Dengguo Lai ◽  
Shuai Cheng ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 521 ◽  
pp. 666-670
Author(s):  
Yun Xia Bian ◽  
De Min He ◽  
Guo Zhu Kuang ◽  
Qiu Min Zhang

Proximate analysis, ultimate analysis and CO2of carbonate were determinated for the aboveground oil shale in Daqing exploratory area. The experiments of pyrolysis of Daqing oil shale were carried out in a fixed-bed reactor in order to study the influence of the pyrolysis temperature and the constant temperature time on oil shale pyrolysis characteristics. The results show that the effect of the pyrolysis is optimal under the conditions of 500°C and the constant temperature time for 20 min, with the yield of shale oil for 28.78% (the yield based on kerogen, similarly hereinafter). The mechanism of the oil shale pyrolysis was discussed. The pyrolysis reaction kinetics of oil shale was studied combining the experimental results of fixed-bed pyrolysis. The reaction activation energy is 28.92 kJ/mol during generating the shale oil process, while the reaction activation energy is 11.21 kJ/mol during generating char process. The yield curve of shale oil changing with the temperature was fitted to compare with the measured value with the constant temperature time for 20 min according to the pyrolysis kinetic parameters.


Fuel ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 48-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanxin Lin ◽  
Dengguo Lai ◽  
Erwei Guo ◽  
Chun Zhang ◽  
Guangwen Xu

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 491-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeeshan Nawaz

AbstractThe catalytic dehydrogenation of iso-butane to iso-butylene is an equilibrium limited endothermic reaction and requires high temperature. The catalyst deactivates quickly, due to deposition of carbonaceous species and countered by periodic regeneration. The reaction-engineering constraints are tied up with operation and/or technology design features. CATOFIN® is a sophisticated commercialized technology for propane/iso-butane dehydrogenation using multiple adiabatic fixed-bed reactors having Cr2O3/Al2O3 as catalyst, that undergo cyclic operations (~18–30m); dehydrogenation, regeneration, evacuation, purging and reduction. It is always a concern, how to maintain CATOFIN® reactor at an optimum production, while overcoming gradual decrease of heat in catalyst bed and deactivation. A homogeneous one-dimensional dynamic reactor model for a commercial CATOFIN® fixed-bed iso-butane dehydrogenation reactor is developed in an equation oriented (EO) platform Aspen Custom Modeler (ACM), for operational optimization and process intensification. Both reaction and regeneration steps were modeled and results were validated. The model predicts the dynamic behavior and demonstrates the extent of catalyst utilization with operating conditions and time, coke formation and removal, etc. The model computes optimum catalyst bed temperature profiles, feed rate, pre-heating, rates for reaction and regeneration, fuel gas requirement, optimum catalyst amount, overall cycle time optimization, and suggest best operational philosophy.


Fuel ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Skala ◽  
Heinz Kopsen ◽  
Milorad Sokić ◽  
Hans-Joachim Neumann ◽  
Jovan Jovanović

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 7236-7240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Q. Lu ◽  
Xiao Q. Hai ◽  
Jian X. Wei ◽  
Ri M. Bao

1989 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 355-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Shing Shen ◽  
Lawrence J. Shadle ◽  
John J. Kovach ◽  
Guo-Qing Zhang ◽  
Richard A. Bajura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document