scholarly journals Estimating volatility and model parameters of stochastic volatility models with jumps using particle filter

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 6490-6495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Ichi Aihara ◽  
Arunabha Bagchi ◽  
Saikat Saha
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (08) ◽  
pp. 1750055 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZHENYU CUI ◽  
J. LARS KIRKBY ◽  
GUANGHUA LIAN ◽  
DUY NGUYEN

This paper contributes a generic probabilistic method to derive explicit exact probability densities for stochastic volatility models. Our method is based on a novel application of the exponential measure change in [Z. Palmowski & T. Rolski (2002) A technique for exponential change of measure for Markov processes, Bernoulli 8(6), 767–785]. With this generic approach, we first derive explicit probability densities in terms of model parameters for several stochastic volatility models with nonzero correlations, namely the Heston 1993, [Formula: see text], and a special case of the [Formula: see text]-Hypergeometric stochastic volatility models recently proposed by [J. Da Fonseca & C. Martini (2016) The [Formula: see text]-Hypergeometric stochastic volatility model, Stochastic Processes and their Applications 126(5), 1472–1502]. Then, we combine our method with a stochastic time change technique to develop explicit formulae for prices of timer options in the Heston model, the [Formula: see text] model and a special case of the [Formula: see text]-Hypergeometric model.


Author(s):  
Xiangyu Yang ◽  
Yanfeng Wu ◽  
Zeyu Zheng ◽  
Jian-Qiang Hu

This paper studies the parameter estimation for Ornstein–Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility models driven by Lévy processes. We propose computationally efficient estimators based on the method of moments that are robust to model misspecification. We develop an analytical framework that enables closed-form representation of model parameters in terms of the moments and autocorrelations of observed underlying processes. Under moderate assumptions, which are typically much weaker than those for likelihood methods, we prove large-sample behaviors for our proposed estimators, including strong consistency and asymptotic normality. Our estimators obtain the canonical square-root convergence rate and are shown through numerical experiments to outperform likelihood-based methods.


Author(s):  
Yun Bao ◽  
Carl Chiarella ◽  
Boda Kang

This chapter proposes an auxiliary particle filter algorithm for inference in regime switching stochastic volatility models in which the regime state is governed by a first-order Markov chain. It proposes an ongoing updated Dirichlet distribution to estimate the transition probabilities of the Markov chain in the auxiliary particle filter. A simulation-based algorithm is presented for the method that demonstrates the ability to estimate a class of models in which the probability that the system state transits from one regime to a different regime is relatively high. The methodology is implemented in order to analyze a real-time series, namely, the foreign exchange rate between the Australian dollar and the South Korean won.


2020 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 2050042
Author(s):  
T. Pellegrino

The aim of this paper is to derive a second-order asymptotic expansion for the price of European options written on two underlying assets, whose dynamics are described by multiscale stochastic volatility models. In particular, the second-order expansion of option prices can be translated into a corresponding expansion in implied correlation units. The resulting approximation for the implied correlation curve turns out to be quadratic in the log-moneyness, capturing the convexity of the implied correlation skew. Finally, we describe a calibration procedure where the model parameters can be estimated using option prices on individual underlying assets.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saba Infante ◽  
Cesar Luna ◽  
Luis Sanchez ◽  
Aracelis Hernández

In this paper, we describe and implement two recursive filtering algorithms, the optimized particle filter, and the Viterbi algorithm, which allow the joint estimation of states and parameters of continuous-time stochastic volatility models, such as the Cox Ingersoll Ross and Heston model. In practice, good parameter estimates are required so that the models are able to generate accurate forecasts. To achieve the objectives the proposed algorithms were implemented using daily empirical data from the time series of the $S\&P500$ returns of the stock exchange index. The proposed methodology facilitates computational calculations of the marginal likelihood of states and allows the reconstruction of unknown states in a suitable way, and reliable estimation of the parameters. To measure the quality of estimation of the algorithms, we used the square root of the mean square error and relative deviation standard as measures of goodness of fit. The estimated errors are insignificant for the analyzed data and the two models considered. We also calculated the execution times of the algorithms, demonstrating that the Viterbi algorithm has less execution time than the optimized particle filter.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (18) ◽  
pp. 2293
Author(s):  
Yumo Zhang

This paper considers an optimal investment problem with mispricing in the family of 4/2 stochastic volatility models under mean–variance criterion. The financial market consists of a risk-free asset, a market index and a pair of mispriced stocks. By applying the linear–quadratic stochastic control theory and solving the corresponding Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation, explicit expressions for the statically optimal (pre-commitment) strategy and the corresponding optimal value function are derived. Moreover, a necessary verification theorem was provided based on an assumption of the model parameters with the investment horizon. Due to the time-inconsistency under mean–variance criterion, we give a dynamic formulation of the problem and obtain the closed-form expression of the dynamically optimal (time-consistent) strategy. This strategy is shown to keep the wealth process strictly below the target (expected terminal wealth) before the terminal time. Results on the special case without mispricing are included. Finally, some numerical examples are given to illustrate the effects of model parameters on the efficient frontier and the difference between static and dynamic optimality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document