Study on correlation between two-dimensional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Peihua Wang ◽  
Fang Nie ◽  
Tiantian Dong ◽  
Guojuan Wang ◽  
Lan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Microvascular Invasion ◽  
Initial Time ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Enhancement Pattern ◽  
Time To Peak ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

OBJECTIVE: To explore the correlation between two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 56 patients with surgically pathologically confirmed HCC lesions were included. Patients were classified according to the presence of MVI: MVI positive group (n = 17) and MVI negative group (n = 39). 2D-US and CEUS examinations were performed within two weeks before surgery. The 2D-US and CEUS features were analyzed for correlation with MVI. Statistically significant parameters of ultrasound characteristic were scored, and the results of the scores were analyzed by ROC curve. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in tumor shape, boundary, capsule, CEUS portal phase and delayed phase enhancement pattern, time to wash out, and tumor margin after enhancement (P <  0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences in tumor location and size, CEUS arterial phase enhancement pattern, initial time, time to peak, and peritumor enhancement (P >  0.05). When diagnosing the presence of MVI in HCC patients with cut-off value of the score combined 2D-US and CEUS features≥3, the maximum Jorden index was 0.58, and its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 94.10%and 64.1%, respectively, meaning that the total score≥3 was highly suspicious of the presence of MVI. CONCLUSIONS: 2D-US and CEUS are feasible methods for preoperative prediction of MVI in HCC, and can provide some theoretical basis for individualized clinical treatment.

scholarly journals Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Monitor Early Recurrence of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Curative Treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lian-Feng Liu ◽  
Zhan-Ling Ding ◽  
Jian-Hong Zhong ◽  
Hong-Xue Li ◽  
Jun-Jie Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Intrahepatic Recurrence ◽  
Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Enhancement Pattern ◽  
Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Objective. To evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for monitoring early intrahepatic recurrence of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative treatment. Methods. We prospectively analyzed 97 patients (124 nodules) with primary HCC who underwent hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation and subsequently experienced intrahepatic recurrence. Patients were assessed with conventional ultrasound and CEUS. They were also assessed with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The image characteristics of CEUS of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs) were analyzed. In addition, the ability of CEUS and CECT/MRI to assess internal artery vascularization in recurrent disease was compared. Results. CEUS of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma showed hyperenhancement in the arterial phase in 96 of 99 nodules, and it showed hypo- or isoenhancement for portal venous and delayed phases. The most common enhancement patterns were “fast-in and slow-out” and “fast-in and fast-out”. Based on the arterial hyperenhancement of lesions and with clinical data such as patient history of HCC and increased level of serum alpha-fetoprotein, the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for recurrent HCC was significantly higher than that based on the enhancement pattern of “fast-in and fast-out”. CEUS of HGDNs showed local or global hyperenhancement during the arterial phase, isoenhancement during the portal venous phase, and isoenhancement or slight hypoenhancement during the delayed phase. The enhancement pattern was “fast-in and slow-out”. In some cases, it was difficult to differentiate HGDNs from recurrent disease using CEUS. Vascularization in recurrent disease was significantly higher when assessed by CEUS than when assessed with CECT/MRI (P < 0.05). For detecting recurrent disease, CEUS showed sensitivity of 97.0%, specificity of 68.0%, positive predictive value of 92.3%, and negative predictive value of 85.0%. The corresponding parameters for CECT/MRI were 71.7%, 72.0%, 88.8%, and 39.1%. Conclusion. Intrahepatic recurrent HCC and HGDNs with diameter ≤ 3.0 cm have a characteristic appearance on CEUS. This imaging modality may be effective for monitoring early intrahepatic recurrence after curative treatment of primary HCC.

Potential application of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in predicting microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yi Dong ◽  
Yijie Qiu ◽  
Daohui Yang ◽  
Lingyun Yu ◽  
Dan Zuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Microvascular Invasion ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Negative Group ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Positive Group ◽  
Quantitative Perfusion ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical value of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) in predicting the microvascular invasion (MVI) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 16 patients with surgery and histopathologically proved HCC lesions were included. Patients were classified according to the presence of MVI: MVI positive group (n = 6) and MVI negative group (n = 10). Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were performed within a week before surgery. Dynamic analysis was performed by VueBox ® software (Bracco, Italy). Three regions of interests (ROIs) were set in the center of HCC lesions, at the margin of HCC lesions and in the surrounding liver parenchyma accordingly. Time intensity curves (TICs) were generated and quantitative perfusion parameters including WiR (wash-in rate), WoR (wash-out rate), WiAUC (wash-in area under the curve), WoAUC (wash-out area under the curve) and WiPi (wash-in perfusion index) were obtained and analyzed. RESULTS: All of HCC lesions showed arterial hyperenhancement (100 %) and at the late phase as hypoenhancement (75 %) in CEUS. Among all CEUS quantitative parameters, the WiAUC and WoAUC were higher in MVI positive group than in MVI negative group in the center HCC lesions (P <  0.05), WiAUC, WoAUC and WiPI were higher in MVI positive group than in MVI negative group at the margin of HCC lesions. WiR and WoR were significant higher in MVI positive group. CONCLUSIONS: D-CEUS with quantitative perfusion analysis has potential clinical value in predicting the existence of MVI in HCC lesions.

Differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Yanling Chen ◽  
Wenping Wang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Diagnostic Ability ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

AIM: To explore the diagnostic ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in differentiating ICC from HCC. The diagnostic ability of CEUS was assessed based on the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The methodologic quality was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included, consisting of 1,116 patients with HCC and 529 with ICC. The general diagnostic performance of CEUS in distinguishing ICC and HCC were as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–0.96); pooled specificity, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79–0.92); pooled PLR, 7.1 (95% CI: 4.1–12.0); pooled NLR, 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05–0.19); pooled DOR, 76 (95% CI: 26–220) and AUC, 0.95(95% CI: 0.93–0.97). Different liver background may be a potential factor that influenced the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS according to the subgroup analysis, with the pooled DOR of 89.67 in the mixed liver background group and 46.87 in the cirrhosis group, respectively. Six informative CEUS features that may help differentiate HCC from ICC were extracted. The three CEUS features favoring HCC were arterial phase hyperenhancement(APHE), mild washout and late washout (>60s); the three CEUS favoring ICC were arterial rim enhancement, marked washout and early washout(<60s). No potential publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: CEUS showed great diagnostic ability in differentiating ICC from HCC, which may be promising for noninvasive evaluation of these diseases.

scholarly journals Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Chen ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Mei Zhu ◽  
Si Sun ◽  
Zheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Size Difference ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
2D Imaging ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Longitudinal Diameter

Abstract Background Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). Methods Fifty-eight clinically proved HCC patients were included. The 2D and CEUS imaging were performed with Siemens S2000, Philips iu22 and BioSound Twice. 2.5 mL of SonoVue® was injected for every CEUS performance. Two physicians measured the maximal longitudinal and the transverse diameters of the tumors in 2D, the AP and the LP of CEUS from one image section. The three measurements were compared by paired t test. Results The mean longitudinal diameter of HCC appeared to be maximal in the AP (4.73 ± 2.04 cm) of CEUS and minimal in the LP (3.98 ± 1.99 cm) of CEUS. The 2D diameter (4.26 ± 2.07 cm) was in the middle between two CEUS measurements. There were significant differences between any two measurements. Conclusion There is size difference between the three kinds of HCC measurement. It appeared to be maximal in the AP of CEUS and minimal in the LP. The 2D diameter was in the middle.

scholarly journals Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Chen ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Si Sun ◽  
Mei Zhu ◽  
Zheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Size Difference ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
2D Imaging ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Longitudinal Diameter

Abstract Background Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). Methods Fifty-eight clinically proved HCC patients were included. The 2D and CEUS imaging were performed with Siemens S2000, Philips iu22 and BioSound Twice. 2.5 mL of SonoVue® was injected for every CEUS performance. Two physicians measured the maximal longitudinal and the transverse diameters of the tumors in 2D, the AP and the LP of CEUS from one image section. The three measurements were compared by paired t test. Results The mean longitudinal diameter of HCC appeared to be maximal in the AP (4.73±2.04 cm) of CEUS and minimal in the LP (3.98±1.99 cm) of CEUS. The 2D diameter (4.26±2.07 cm) was in the middle between two CEUS measurements. There were significant differences between any two measurements. Conclusion There is size difference between the three kinds of HCC measurement. It appeared to be maximal in the AP of CEUS and minimal in the LP. The 2D diameter was in the middle.

scholarly journals Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Chen ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Si Sun ◽  
Mei Zhu ◽  
Zheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Size Difference ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
2D Imaging ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Longitudinal Diameter

Abstract Background Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). Methods Fifty-eight clinically proved HCC patients were included. The 2D and CEUS imaging were performed with Siemens S2000, Philips iu22 and BioSound Twice. 2.5 mL of SonoVue® was injected for every CEUS performance. Two physicians measured the maximal longitudinal and the transverse diameters of the tumors in 2D, the AP and the LP of CEUS from one image section. The three measurements were compared by paired t test. Results The mean longitudinal diameter of HCC appeared to be maximal in the AP (4.73 ± 2.04 cm) of CEUS and minimal in the LP (3.98 ± 1.99 cm) of CEUS. The 2D diameter (4.26 ± 2.07 cm) was in the middle between two CEUS measurements. There were significant differences between any two measurements. Conclusion There is size difference between the three kinds of HCC measurement. It appeared to be maximal in the AP of CEUS and minimal in the LP. The 2D diameter was in the middle.

Preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma based on kupffer phase radiomic features of sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SCEUS): A prospective study

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Yi Dong ◽  
Dan Zuo ◽  
Yi-Jie Qiu ◽  
Jia-Ying Cao ◽  
Han-Zhang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Microvascular Invasion ◽  
Ultrasound Images ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Preoperative Prediction ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Receiver Operating

OBJECTIVES: To establish and evaluate a machine learning radiomics model based on grayscale and Sonazoid contrast enhanced ultrasound images for the preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS: 100 cases of histopathological confirmed HCC lesions were prospectively included. Regions of interest were segmented on both grayscale and Kupffer phase of Sonazoid contrast enhanced (CEUS) images. Radiomic features were extracted from tumor region and region containing 5 mm of peritumoral liver tissues. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (MRMR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) were used for feature selection and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier was trained for radiomic signature calculation. Radiomic signatures were incorporated with clinical variables using univariate-multivariate logistic regression for the final prediction of MVI. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate model’s predictive performance of MVI. RESULTS: Age were the only clinical variable significantly associated with MVI. Radiomic signature derived from Kupffer phase images of peritumoral liver tissues (kupfferPT) displayed a significantly better performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.800 (95% confidence interval: 0.667, 0.834), the final prediction model using Age and kupfferPT achieved an AUROC of 0.804 (95% CI: 0.723, 0.878), accuracy of 75.0%, sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 69.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomic model based on Kupffer phase ultrasound images of tissue adjacent to HCC lesions showed an observable better predictive value compared to grayscale images and has potential value to facilitate preoperative identification of HCC patients at higher risk of MVI.

scholarly journals Alteration of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Chang ◽  
Alexia Dumitrache ◽  
Nina Böhling ◽  
Jasmin Abu-Omar ◽  
Carsten Meyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Portosystemic Shunt ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Liver Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

AbstractTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can treat portal hypertensive complications and modifies hepatic hemodynamics. Modification of liver perfusion can alter contrast enhancement dynamics of liver nodules. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis with TIPS. In this prospective monocentric observational study, CEUS was used to characterize focal liver lesions in patients at risk for HCC with and without TIPS. Times of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) und washout were quantified. Perfusion-index (PI) and resistance-index (RI) of hepatic artery and portal venous flow parameters were measured via doppler ultrasonography. Diagnostic gold standard was MRI/CT or histology. This study included 49 liver lesions [23 TIPS (11 HCC), 26 no TIPS (15 HCC)]. 26 were diagnosed as HCC by gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to diagnose HCC with and without TIPS were 93.3% and 100% vs. 90.9% and 93.3%, respectively. APHE appeared significantly earlier in patients with TIPS compared to patients without TIPS. TIPS significantly accentuates APHE of HCC in CEUS. CEUS has good diagnostic performance for diagnosis of HCC in patients with TIPS.

scholarly journals Continuous Dynamic Registration of Microvascularization of Liver Tumors with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Philipp Beyer ◽  
Benedikt Pregler ◽  
Isabel Wiesinger ◽  
Christian Stroszczynski ◽  
Philipp Wiggermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Tumors ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Regional Blood Flow ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Time To Peak ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Significant Difference

Aim.To evaluate the diagnostic value of quantification of liver tumor microvascularization using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) measured continuously from the arterial phase to the late phase (3 minutes).Material and Methods.We present a retrospective analysis of 20 patients with malignant (n=13) or benign (n=7) liver tumors. The tumors had histopathologically been proven or clearly identified using contrast-enhanced reference imaging with either 1.5 T MRI (liver specific contrast medium) or triphase CT and follow-up. CEUS was performed using a multifrequency transducer (1–5 MHz) and a bolus injection of 2.4 mL sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles. A retrospective perfusion analysis was performed to determine TTP (time-to-peak), RBV (regional blood volume), RBF (regional blood flow), and Peak.Results.Statistics revealed a significant difference (P<0.05) between benign and malignant tumors in the RBV, RBF, and Peak but not in TTP (P=0.07). Receiver operating curves (ROC) were generated for RBV, RBF, Peak, and TTP with estimated ROC areas of 0.97, 0.96, 0.98, and 0.76, respectively.Conclusion.RBV, RBF, and Peak continuously measured over a determined time period of 3 minutes could be of valuable support in differentiating malignant from benign liver tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document