Effects of implantable peroneal nerve stimulation on gait quality, energy expenditure, participation and user satisfaction in patients with post-stroke drop foot using an ankle-foot orthosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 795-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven Schiemanck ◽  
Frank Berenpas ◽  
Roos van Swigchem ◽  
Pepijn van den Munckhof ◽  
Joost de Vries ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 547-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Berenpas ◽  
Sven Schiemanck ◽  
Anita Beelen ◽  
Frans Nollet ◽  
Vivian Weerdesteyn ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne R. Sheffler ◽  
Maureen T. Hennessey ◽  
Gregory G. Naples ◽  
John Chae

Objective. To compare the efficacy of the Odstock Dropped-Foot Stimulator (ODFS), a transcutaneous peroneal nerve stimulation device, versus an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) in improving functional ambulation of chronic stroke survivors. Intervention. Fourteen chronic stroke survivors with foot-drop participated in the study. Participants received ambulation training under 3 test conditions: 1) ODFS, 2) customized AFO, and 3) no device. Each participant was evaluated using the modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile under the 3 test conditions. All participants were evaluated with a post-evaluation survey to solicit device feedback and preferences. Results. Functional ambulation with the AFO was significantly improved, relative to no device, on the floor ( P = 0.000), carpet ( P = 0.013), and “up and go” test ( P = 0.042). There was a trend toward significance on the obstacle ( P = 0.092) and stair ( P = 0.067) trials. Functional ambulation with the ODFS was significantly improved, relative to no device, on the carpet( P = 0.004). A trend toward significance on floor ( P = 0.081), obstaclxze ( P = 0.092), and stair ( P = 0.079) trials was observed. The difference in functional ambulation between the AFO and ODFS showed a trend toward statistical significance on floor ( P = 0.065) and up and go ( P = 0.082) trials only. Given a choice between the ODFS and AFO for long-term correction of footdrop, participants indicated a preference for the ODFS. Conclusion. The AFO and the ODFS may be comparable in their effect on improving functional ambulation as compared to no device. Specific characteristics of the ODFS may make it a preferred intervention by stroke survivors. More rigorously controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.


PM&R ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. S130-S130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynne R. Sheffler ◽  
Paul N. Taylor ◽  
Stephanie N. Bailey ◽  
Douglas D. Gunzler ◽  
Jaap H. Buurke ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzad Farmani ◽  
Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei ◽  
Mahmood Bahramizadeh ◽  
Gholamreza Aminian ◽  
Mohammad Reza Nikoo ◽  
...  

Background:Ankle–foot orthoses could be utilized both with and without shoes. While several studies have shown that ankle–foot orthoses improve gait abilities in hemiplegic patients, it remains unclear whether they should be used with shoes or without.Objectives:The study purpose was to compare the effect of standard shoes and rocker shoes on functional mobility in post-stroke hemiplegic patients utilizing ankle–foot orthosis.Study design:Randomized clinical study.Methods:Thirty post-stroke hemiplegic patients participated in this study randomly assigned to two groups. Group I received standard shoes + ankle–foot orthosis and group II were provided with rocker shoes + ankle–foot orthosis. Their functional mobility and energy expenditure parameters including timed up and go, timed up stairs, timed down stairs, preferred walking speed, and oxygen (O2) cost (mL/kg/m) were measured.Results:In group I, no significant changes were seen in outcome measures after wearing standard shoes. While in group II, O2cost and timed up and go time significantly decreased, and preferred walking speed increased when patients wore rocker shoes. Also, there was a significant difference between rocker shoes and standard shoes in improvement of timed up and go, preferred walking speed, and O2cost.Conclusion:When patients using ankle–foot orthosis wore rocker shoes, their functional mobility improved and oxygen cost diminished. Also, rocker shoes was significantly more effective than standard shoes in improving functional mobility parameters.Clinical relevanceThis study suggests that in post-stroke hemiplegic patients using ankle–foot orthosis, wearing rocker shoes can lead to much more improved functional mobility and decreased energy expenditure compared to ankle–foot orthosis only. Thus, in stroke patients, the combination of ankle–foot orthosis-rocker shoes is recommended for both rehabilitation programs and ankle–foot orthosis efficacy investigations.


Author(s):  
Ehsan Tarkesh ◽  
Mohammad H. Elahinia ◽  
Mohamed Samir Hefzy

This paper is on development of an active ankle foot orthosis (AAFO). This device will fill the gap in the existing research aimed at helping patients with drop foot muscle deficiencies as well as rehabilitation activities. Drop foot patients are unable to lift their foot because of reduced or no muscle activity around the ankle. The major causes of drop foot are severing of the nerve, stroke, cerebral palsy and multiple sclerosis. There are two common complications from drop foot. First, the patient cannot control the falling of their foot after heel strike, so that it slaps the ground on every step. The second complication is the inability to clear the toe during swing. This causes the patients to drag their toe on the ground throughout the swing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document