Neck and upper extremity symptoms among male dentists and pharmacists

Work ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omid Aminian ◽  
Zahra Banafsheh Alemohammad ◽  
Mohammad Hashem Hosseini
2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 502-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Coenen ◽  
Henk F van der Molen ◽  
Alex Burdorf ◽  
Maaike A Huysmans ◽  
Leon Straker ◽  
...  

ObjectivesIt has often been suggested that screen work (ie, work on desktop, laptop, notebook or tablet computers) is a risk factor for neck and upper extremity symptoms. However, an up-to-date overview and quantification of evidence are lacking. We aimed to systematically review the association of exposure to screen work with neck and upper extremity symptoms from prospective studies.MethodsAn electronic database search (PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and Scopus) for prospective studies on the association of exposure to screen work and musculoskeletal symptoms was conducted. Studies were synthesised regarding extracted data and risk of bias, and meta-analyses were conducted.ResultsAfter screening 3423 unique references, 19 articles from 12 studies (with 18 538 participants) were included for the current review, with the most recent exposure assessment reported in 2005. Studies described duration and input frequency of screen work (ie, computer, keyboard and mouse use, assessed using self-reports or software recordings) and musculoskeletal symptoms (ie, self-reported neck/shoulder and distal upper extremity symptoms and diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]). Although there was overall an increased occurrence of musculoskeletal symptoms with larger exposure to screen work (relative risk: 1.11 [1.03 1.19]), findings were rather inconsistent with weaker (and statistically non-significant) risks when screen work was assessed by software recording (1.05 [0.91 1.21]) compared to with self-report (1.14 [1.03 1.19]).ConclusionsWe found an increased risk of musculoskeletal symptoms with screen work. However, the evidence is heterogeneous, and it is striking that it lacks information from contemporary screen work using laptop, notebook or tablet computers.


1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel M. Press ◽  
Jeffrey L. Young

1997 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 1144-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Feuerstein ◽  
Thomas Armstrong ◽  
Paul Hickey ◽  
Andrew Lincoln

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. E4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence H. Phillips ◽  
Vern C. Juel

Electrodiagnostic testing in patients who have upper-extremity symptoms, which may include carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), has been the gold standard for diagnosis for many years. Depite their value, these tests are underutilized. The authors examined the use patterns of electrodiagnostic testing at the University of Virginia by reviewing the records of the Electromyography Laboratory for the calendar year 1994. Studies in patients with CTS comprised 15% of the 1626 studies performed during that time. The mononeuropathy was mild in the majority of cases and most of the patients were referred for testing by specialists. There was a clear referral bias on the part of the primary care physicians, and the severity of mononeuropathy in the patients they referred for testing was significantly greater than in patients referred by specialists. The data indicate that electrodiagnostic testing has clear value in the evaluation of patients who have upper-extremity symptoms. Despite this fact, primary care physicians appear to underutilize electrodiagnostic testing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document