scholarly journals Effect of the Amount of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cells on Survival and Engraftment in Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Statistical Population ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Training And Research ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
High Dose Melphalan ◽  
Group 1

Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently a gold standard treatment for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The recommended dose of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) for adequate engraftment is above 2 × 106 cells/kg. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the number of CD34+ HPCs and the survival in MM patients who underwent ASCT in the Hematology Department of Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. Materials and Methods: The statistical population of this consisted of 200 MM patients who underwent ASCT within 2009-2019. The clinical characteristics of the patients, disease status pre-SCT, number of infused CD34+ cells, neutrophil, and platelet engraftment days were recorded. The patients were divided into two groups, based on whether the re-infused CD34+ HPCs dose was < 5 × 106 cells/kg (Group 1) or ≥ 5 × 106 cells/kg (Group 2). The groups were compared in terms of engraftment and overall survival (OS) times. Results: A total of 200 patients were included in our study. Group 1 (n=125) included patients with < 5 × 106 cells/kg CD34+ HPC re-infusion, and Group 2 (n=75) consisted of patients with ≥ 5 × 106cells/kg CD34+ HPC re-infusion. The patients’ median age scores in Group 1 and Group 2 were 57 (25-71) and 56 (33-72) years, respectively. The median follow-up period was 33 months (6-130). The median OS of all patients was 71 months (95% confidence interval, 59.1-82.9). The median neutrophil and platelet engraftment times were similar between the groups (P=0.4 and P=0.4, respectively). In both groups, the median OS time was 71 months (P=0.8), which was similar. Conclusion: The greater number of CD34+ HPCs re-infusion for ASCT after high dose melphalan chemotherapy in MM patients did not affect platelet and neutrophil engraftment time and OS; therefore, this amount of reinfusion was not required.

Influence of First-Line Regimens on the Outcomes of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 931-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bimalangshu R. Dey ◽  
Benjamin Cox ◽  
A. Jo Chien ◽  
Martin Caron ◽  
Steven L. McAfee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Randomized trials that incorporated high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (Au-HSCT) into the early treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma demonstrated superior overall and event-free survival (EFS) in patients 65 years of age or younger, who received Au-HSCT, as compared with patients who received conventional chemotherapy. Based on these encouraging results, Au-HSCT is recommended for patients with myeloma as part of their initial treatment, and today, myeloma is the most common indication for HSCT in the world. All patients in these trials received four to six months of conventional chemotherapy prior to HDC and Au-HSCT. In practice, however, both in the community as well as in academic hospitals, patients are undergoing Au-HSCT after being treated with various first-line regimens, including chemotherapeutics, high-dose dexamethasone (HDex), immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide and recently, proteasome inhibitors. In this retrospective study, we examined the impact of first-line therapy on the outcomes following Au-HSCT. Our objective was to compare two treatment groups - chemotherapy versus non-chemotherapy, prior to Au-HSCT - with respect to survival after Au-HSCT. Between 1997 and 2004, 37 previously untreated evaluable patients with myeloma, received either chemotherapy (group 1, n=25; vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD), n=24; melphalan and prednisone (MP), n=1) or non-chemotherapy regimens (group 2, n=12; HDex, n=9; thalidomide plus HDex, n=3), then received HDC followed by cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor-mobilized HSCT. The median age of patients in group 1 was 58 (range, 44–73) years and in group 2 was 55 (range, 41–67) years; 22 patients in group 1 (88%) and 10 patients in group 2 (83%) had stage III disease; the median times from diagnosis to HSCT were 6 (range, 5–16) and 8 (range, 5–25) months, respectively, in groups 1 and 2. The rates of complete and near-complete response were 44% in group 1 and 42% in group 2; the rates of partial responses were also similar: 48% and 42% respectively. The median duration of EFS was 31 (range, 7–89) months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 55 (range, 12–98) months in group 1, as compared with group 2 where EFS and OS were 21 (range, 12–40) and 31 (range, 16–76) months, respectively. The EFS at 3 years was 44% in group 1 and 25% in group 2, and OS at 5 years was 32% in group 1 and 8% in group 2 (statistically not significant). In conclusion, patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, when treated with chemotherapy prior to Au-HSCT, may have long-term overall and EFS advantages, as compared with patients who are treated with first-line non-chemotherapy regimens. The reasons for the longer duration of response in the chemotherapy group despite similar response rates in the two groups are unknown, but may be due to more effective suppression of residual disease or non-specific damage to the marrow microenvironment, which is necessary for the growth of myeloma cells. Although, the difference in survival outcomes following Au-HSCT between the two groups did not achieve statistical significance, our results raise an important question regarding the “adequacy” of different first-line regimens prior to Au-HSCT, and therefore, justify the need for prospective randomized studies to evaluate optimal pre-AuHSCT induction therapy.

Bortezomib Given in Sequence with Anthracycline and Thalidomide-Containing Regimens Does Not Adversely Affect Stem Cell Mobilization and Engraftment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Nicholas M. Fisher ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Hanna J. Khoury ◽  
Douglas R. Adkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). While high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) remains the standard of care, there is considerable interest in incorporating bortezomib into the initial treatment of MM. However, the role of bortezomib in frontline therapy for MM will depend in part on its effects on subsequent stem cell mobilization and engraftment. We conducted a pilot study of bortezomib administered pretransplant followed by high-dose melphalan with AHSCT. Two cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 were administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. One week after the last dose of bortezomib, stem cell mobilization was initiated by administering filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously on consecutive days until stem cell harvest was completed. Stem cell collection began on day 5 of filgrastim via large volume apheresis (20 L/day) performed daily until a minimum of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Patients were subsequently admitted to the hospital for high-dose melphalan 100 mg/m2/day x 2 days followed by reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells 48 hours later. Sargramostim 250 mcg/m2/day subcutaneously was administered starting day +1 post-transplant and continued until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days. To date, 23 of a planned 40 patients have been enrolled in this study with 19 patients having completed their initial therapy with bortezomib followed by AHSCT. Patient population consists of 16 male and 7 female patients with the median age at diagnosis of 58 years (range 38–68). Myeloma characteristics at diagnosis were as follows (number of patients): IgG (16), IgA (7) with stage II (9) or stage III (14) disease. Prior to receiving bortezomib, 11 patients were treated with VAD (vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone) or DVd (Doxil, vincristine and dexamethasone), 5 patients with thalidomide and 5 patients with both. Two patients did not receive any prior chemotherapy. All patients successfully achieved the target of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in either one (15/19 patients) or two (4/19 patients) collections with the first apheresis product containing a mean of 5.79 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Analysis of peripheral blood by flow cytometry demonstrated no significant differences in lymphocyte subsets before and after treatment with bortezomib. Following AHSCT, all patients successfully engrafted with a median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥ 500/mm3) of 11 days (range 9–14 days). Platelet engraftment (time to platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 sustained for 7 days without transfusion) occurred at a median of 12 days (range 9–30 days). Eleven patients were evaluable for response at 100 days post-transplant. Compared to pre-bortezomib paraprotein levels, 3 patients achieved a CR or near CR, 7 maintained a PR while 1 patient developed PD. We conclude that pretransplant treatment with 2 cycles of bortezomib does not adversely affect stem cell yield or time to engraftment in patients with MM undergoing AHSCT. Updated results and detailed analysis will be available at the time of presentation.

scholarly journals Double-intensive therapy in high-risk multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 2827-2833 ◽  
Author(s):  
JL Harousseau ◽  
N Milpied ◽  
JP Laporte ◽  
P Collombat ◽  
T Facon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Dose Therapy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

A high remission rate is achieved with high-dose melphalan (HDM) in multiple myeloma (MM), and autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells allows a prompt hematologic recovery after high-dose therapy. We treated 97 patients with high-risk MM (group 1:44 advanced MM including 14 primary resistances and 30 relapses; group 2: 53 newly diagnosed MM) with a first course of HDM. For responding patients a second course of high-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell support was proposed. After the first HDM, the overall response and complete remission rates were 71% and 25% with no significant difference between the two groups. The median durations of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly longer in group 1 (29.5 days and 32 days, respectively) than in group 2 (23 days and 17 days, respectively). This severe myelosuppression led to eight toxic deaths and the fact that only 38 of the 69 responders could proceed to the second course (three allogenic and 35 autologous transplantations). Among the 35 patients undergoing autologous transplantation (10 in group 1, 25 in group 2), 31 received their marrow unpurged collected after the first HDM, and four received peripheral blood stem cells. The median durations of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after autologous transplantation were 24 days and 49 days, respectively. Two toxic deaths and nine prolonged thrombocytopenias were observed. The median survival for the 97 patients was 24 months (17 months in group 1, 37 months in group 2) and the median duration of response was 20 months. The only parameters that have a significant impact on the survival are the age (+/- 50 years) and the response to HDM. The median survival of the 35 patients undergoing autologous transplantation is 41 months, but the median duration of remission is 28 months with no plateau of the remission duration curve. Patients responding to HDM may have prolonged survival, but even a second course of high-dose therapy probably cannot eradicate the malignant clone.

scholarly journals Double-intensive therapy in high-risk multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 2827-2833 ◽  
Author(s):  
JL Harousseau ◽  
N Milpied ◽  
JP Laporte ◽  
P Collombat ◽  
T Facon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Dose Therapy ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract A high remission rate is achieved with high-dose melphalan (HDM) in multiple myeloma (MM), and autologous transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells allows a prompt hematologic recovery after high-dose therapy. We treated 97 patients with high-risk MM (group 1:44 advanced MM including 14 primary resistances and 30 relapses; group 2: 53 newly diagnosed MM) with a first course of HDM. For responding patients a second course of high-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell support was proposed. After the first HDM, the overall response and complete remission rates were 71% and 25% with no significant difference between the two groups. The median durations of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly longer in group 1 (29.5 days and 32 days, respectively) than in group 2 (23 days and 17 days, respectively). This severe myelosuppression led to eight toxic deaths and the fact that only 38 of the 69 responders could proceed to the second course (three allogenic and 35 autologous transplantations). Among the 35 patients undergoing autologous transplantation (10 in group 1, 25 in group 2), 31 received their marrow unpurged collected after the first HDM, and four received peripheral blood stem cells. The median durations of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after autologous transplantation were 24 days and 49 days, respectively. Two toxic deaths and nine prolonged thrombocytopenias were observed. The median survival for the 97 patients was 24 months (17 months in group 1, 37 months in group 2) and the median duration of response was 20 months. The only parameters that have a significant impact on the survival are the age (+/- 50 years) and the response to HDM. The median survival of the 35 patients undergoing autologous transplantation is 41 months, but the median duration of remission is 28 months with no plateau of the remission duration curve. Patients responding to HDM may have prolonged survival, but even a second course of high-dose therapy probably cannot eradicate the malignant clone.

Stem Cell Factor (SCF) for Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) Mobilization: Results of the Randomized IFM 99-01 Trial.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2921-2921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Bourin ◽  
Anne Huynh ◽  
Christian Recher ◽  
Christian Berthou ◽  
Laurent Garderet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Injection Point ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
Hematopoietic Reconstitution ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Introduction : In multiple myeloma, the usual mobilization protocol is toxic because of the use of cyclophosphamide. Several studies showed the interest of SCF. Objective : To compare two mobilization protocols: endoxan 4g/m2 + G-CSF 5μg/kg/j (arm A) versus G-CSF 10μg/kg/j + SCF 25μg/kg/j (arm B) in a prospective, open and, randomized trial. Patients and methods : the studied criteria were the quality of the cell collections (objective > 5.106 CD34+ cells into 2 cytapheresis), the toxicity of the mobilization and graft phases, as well as the post-graft hematopoietic reconstitution. Multiple myeloma patients, less than 65 years old, with 0 or 1 risk factor (ß2microglobulin > 3 mg/L or chromosome 13 deletion) and who have a response ≥ 50% after 3 cures of VAD were included. After a fourth cure of VAD each patient was planed to receive a tandem transplant (IFM 99-02 trial). Results : 150 patients (pts) were included and 138 were eligible (arm A = 67 pts, arm B = 71 pts). Pts and disease characteristics were similar in each arm. The objective of HSC collection was obtained with 92% pts in arm A and 81% pts in arm B (non significant). The total number of CD34+ cells collected were similar: 16.106 CD34+/kg (arm A) versus 15.106 CD34+/kg (arm B). Toxicity of HSC mobilization procedure was significantly different: duration of neutropenia < 500/mm3 (8 days in arm A versus 0 days in arm B, p<0.00001), duration of thrombopenia < 50 000/mm3 (5 days in arm A versus 0 days in arm B, p<0.0001), use of antibiotherapy (43% pts in arm A versus 9% pts in arm B, p<0.00001). 31% pts receiving SCF had local erythema at injection point. One pts experienced a grade 3 allergy in arm B. Hematopoietic reconstitution after first graft (high dose Melphalan 140 mg/m2, G-CSF at day 7) was not significantly different in either arm: duration of neutropenia < 500/mm3 (8 days in arm A versus 10 days in arm B), duration of thrombopenia < 50 000/mm3 (7.5 days in arm A versus 9 days in arm B), number of red blood cells units transfusions (1.5 versus 1.5). The 36 months overall survival probability was not significantly different with HDC mobilization (64%) versus SCF + G-CSF mobilization (87%). Conclusion : In myeloma patients, HSC mobilization with SCF + G-CSF is as effective as HDC + G-CSF, and gives very significant lower toxicities.

scholarly journals Carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: the real-life experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (7) ◽  
pp. 785-792
Author(s):  
Vera A. Zherebtsova ◽  
Vladimir I. Vorobyev ◽  
Eduard G. Gemdzhian ◽  
Margarita A. Ulyanova ◽  
Mikhail V. Chernikov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Real Life ◽  
High Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Group 1

Background. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) have been approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on ASPIRE clinical trial. Aim. Analysis of efficacy and safety of KRd in routine clinical practice. Materials and methods. The prospective analysis included patients with MM who received at least one line of previous therapy. The inclusion criteria were relapse/progression; refractoriness; lack of very good partial response (VGPR) and more after the first line of therapy. Since February 2016, we used KRd like in ASPIRE trial, since October 2019, carfilzomib has been used at a dose of 56 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT), consolidation (KRd) and maintenance therapy (Rd) were regarded as one line of therapy. Results and discussion. We evaluated 77 patients with median age at the time of diagnosis is 55 (3072) years. For 56% (n=43) of patients KRd was applied as the second line (group 1), for 44% (n=34) as the third and more (group 2). In 23/43 patients from group 1, an early change in therapy was made due to insufficient effectiveness (after 24 courses of VCD or PAD). KRd served as a "bridge" to autoHSCT in 25 (32%) patients (21 of 25 in group 1). Another 7 patients underwent collection of autoHSC (all from group 1). The overall response rate (ORR) was 80.5%, with 33.8% complete response (CR) and 26% VGPR. ORR in group 1 was 98% versus 65.6% in group 2; 24-month overall survival (OS) was 70%, progression free survival (PFS) 49.8%. In group 1, 24-month OS was 85.6% versus 50.0% in group 2, 24-month PFS was 67.8% versus 25.5% (p=0.01). Conclusion. Our analysis confirmed the high efficiency of KRd in the treatment of RRMM in real-life practice. Early correction of therapy with insufficient effectiveness of the first line made it possible to implement the strategy of high-dose consolidation and autoHSCT in a larger percentage of patients with MM.

Comparison of conditioning regimen toxicities among autologous stem cell transplantation eligible multiple myeloma patients: High-dose melphalan versus high-dose melphalan and bortezomib

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eda Aypar ◽  
Fikret Vehbi İzzettin ◽  
Şahika Zeynep Akı ◽  
Mesut Sancar ◽  
Zeynep Arzu Yeğin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Duration Of Hospitalization ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Background Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) remains the standard of care for younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Currently, high-dose melphalan (HDM) is recommended as conditioning regimen before AHSCT. Preclinical data suggest that combining bortezomib and melphalan has synergistic effect against multiple myeloma cells. Bortezomib and HDM (Bor-HDM) combination as conditioning regimen has been investigated by many other investigators. Objective In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare transplant-related toxicities and hematologic recovery of HDM and Bor-HDM conditioning regimens. Method We retrospectively evaluated hematologic recovery and toxicity profile in patients with MM who received AHSCT with either HDM ( n = 114) or Bor-HDM ( n = 53) conditioning regimen. Results Nonhematologic toxicities were comparable between HDM and Bor-HDM conditioning regimen, except mucositis and diarrhea being more frequent in the Bor-HDM group. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment time and duration of hospital stay were significantly shorter for HDM regimen. Conclusions In this retrospective analysis, we observed engraftment kinetics and duration of hospitalization were significantly worse in Bor-HDM conditioning regimen with manageable toxicities. Randomized studies are needed to further compare Bor- HDM regimen to HDM in terms of response rates, toxicities, and transplant-related mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document