scholarly journals A Detailed Comparison of Various Steel Types - Stainless Steel, Structural Steel and Aluminum Steel

2020 ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Adekoya Oluwaseun Abiodun ◽  
Oluwasegun M. Ayoola ◽  
Taofeeq O. Olajire ◽  
Oluwatimilehin E. Oluwajire ◽  
Olawale J. Abidakun
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Structural Steel ◽  
Fire Resistance ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Commercial Buildings ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Three Sheets ◽  
Steel Design

Steel, compared to iron is an alloy of iron with commonly a few percent of carbon to enhance its strength and fracture resistance. The use of stainless steel in the design of structures remains a relevant discussion across different areas. In fact, the importance of structural steel in the glocal world has applications in virtually every sector. Also, aluminum steel has been used widely in residential applications, commercial buildings, and vehicular (automotive) designs. A close comparison of these three sheets of steel will give enlightenment about what brings them together and their applications for such characteristics they possess that seem alike. Many researchers argue about the possibility of their sustainability both in terms of cost, availability, fire resistance, and fabrication. Understanding their behaviors following their comparison will provide accurate answers to these propositions. This paper compares the stainless, structural, and aluminum steels in terms of usage, properties (chemical and mechanical), compares exclusively the structural and stainless steel design provisions, reviews recent research activities, and highlights the important developments.

Effect of High Strength Structural Steel Structural State on Fracture Resistance

Metallurgist ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. N. Zikeev ◽  
O. N. Chevskaya ◽  
A. R. Mishet’yan ◽  
V. G. Filippov ◽  
A. B. Korostelev
Keyword(s):  
Structural Steel ◽  
Structural State ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
High Strength

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Resin Fiber Post and Stainless Steel Post: An In Vitro Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 080-084
Author(s):  
Vijay Singh ◽  
Poonam Bogra ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
Navneet Kukreja ◽  
Neha Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Compressive Force ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractFracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with post. Aims: This study aims to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with resin fiber and stainless steel post. Commercially available prefabricated resin fiber post(Dentsply Maillefer Easy Post), prefabricated stainless steel post(Coltene/Whaledent Parapost) were used. Methods and Material: Forty five maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 3 groups: Control Group (Group I) without any post (n = 15), Resin Fiber Post Group (Group II) (n = 15) and Stainless Steel Post Group (Group III) (n = 15). In all Groups except control group, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. All the specimens were subjected to compressive force under a universal testing machine until fracture. Statistical analysis used: The results were analyzed using the variable analysis test (ANOVA). Results: One-way analysis of variance revealed significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (925.2183 N), followed by the resin fiber post group (486.7265 N) and stainless steel post group (423.539N). Conclusions: Teeth restored with resin fiber post showed higher fracture resistance values than prefabricated stainless steel post.

Fire-Resistance Design Method for Stainless Steel Tubular X-Joints

2022 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Runmin Ding ◽  
Shenggang Fan ◽  
Lianlian Jia ◽  
Hang Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fire Resistance ◽  
Design Method

scholarly journals Reliability analysis of structural stainless steel design provisions

2015 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 293-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Afshan ◽  
P. Francis ◽  
N.R. Baddoo ◽  
L. Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Steel Design

scholarly journals To Optimize the Deflection of Beams by Conducting Bending Test Using Ansys Workbench 15

2019 ◽  
pp. 238-243
Author(s):  
Mulayam Kumar ◽  
Dr. Simant ◽  
Vijay Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Taguchi Method ◽  
Aluminium Alloy ◽  
Structural Steel ◽  
Cantilever Beam ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Equivalent Stresses ◽  
Simply Supported ◽  
Ansys Workbench

The present work has been carried out to study the effect of the varying the load at different materials (Aluminium Alloy 7075-T6, stainless steel 305 and Structural Steel 345w) on deflection. The simply supported beam has been subjected to varying load 5000N - 10000N and cantilever beam has been subjected to varying load 500N-1000N. The result obtained is in form of Directional Deflection and Equivalent Stresses. This analysis is done by the ANSYS Workbench 15.0 software under the static structural analysis further this result has been optimized using TAGUCHI METHOD using MINITAB17.

Fire-resistance of RHS stainless steel beams with three faces exposed to fire

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 284-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenggang Fan ◽  
Li Du ◽  
Shuai Li ◽  
Liyuan Zhang ◽  
Ke Shi
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Fire Resistance ◽  
Steel Beams

Structural Steel Design

1988 ◽  
pp. 209-281
Author(s):  
G. L. Nelson ◽  
H. B. Manbeck ◽  
N. F. Meador
Keyword(s):  
Structural Steel ◽  
Steel Design
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document