scholarly journals Sessile serrated adenomas detection rate among the surgeons and the gastroenterologists: A retrospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-30
Author(s):  
Devisha Raina ◽  
Rasika Hendahewa
2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S140-S140
Author(s):  
Birmaji Ali ◽  
Peter Fahim ◽  
Jenni Steinbrunner ◽  
Robert Kindel

2013 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. S635
Author(s):  
Shilun Li ◽  
Joanne Maas ◽  
Michael Spencer ◽  
Panagiotis Panagiotakis ◽  
Meher Rahman ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4340
Author(s):  
Cristina Ferrari ◽  
Anna Giulia Nappi ◽  
Giulia Santo ◽  
Paolo Mammucci ◽  
Dino Rubini ◽  
...  

The widespread COVID-19 vaccination led to unexpected PET findings. Notably, axillary and interpectoral lymphadenopathies ipsilateral to the vaccine inoculation were observed. We aimed to assess the hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy (HLN) detection rate on PET/CT. Secondly, we investigated factors that might help in HLN differential diagnosis. A retrospective analysis on 1196 consecutive patients referred for a PET/CT was performed. All patients were asked about the date, type and site of vaccine injections. HLNs were recorded and categorized according to risk classes and SUVmax grades. A statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation between HLN detection and different clinical/vaccine data. HLN detection rate was 15% and 27% in the No Vac- and vac-groups (p < 0.001), respectively. In the Vac-group, age (p < 0.001) and time interval from vaccine-to-PET (p = 0.010) were inversely correlated with HLN detection. Furthermore, SUVmax significantly changed during time intervals, with lower values beyond 20 days (p < 0.001). In the era of mass COVID-19 vaccination, a higher axillary and interpectoral lymphadenopathies detection ipsilateral to vaccine injection was observed. These PET findings can be wrongly interpreted, complicating cancer patients’ management. To minimize these pitfalls, a detailed vaccination anamnesis must be recorded and should take into account the appropriate PET schedule.


2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (12) ◽  
pp. E1275-E1279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaseen Perbtani ◽  
Michael Riverso ◽  
Jonathan Shuster ◽  
Joydeep Chakraborty ◽  
Tony Brar ◽  
...  

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (03) ◽  
pp. 237-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Roelandt ◽  
Ingrid Demedts ◽  
Hilde Willekens ◽  
Talat Bessissow ◽  
Lieve Braeye ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To improve detection of mucosal lesions during colonoscopy a number of imaging modalities have been suggested, including high definition and virtual chromoendoscopy. Given the theoretical advantage of these new imaging techniques, we aimed to investigate their use for the detection of polyps in patients referred for colonoscopy in a large tertiary hospital. Methods Demographic, endoscopic, and histological data from 1855 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy were collected prospectively. Patients were randomly assigned to three endoscopy systems (Fujinon, Olympus, or Pentax) in combination with four modalities: conventional white-light colonoscopy (n = 505), high definition white-light colonoscopy (n = 582), virtual chromoendoscopy (n = 285) and high definition virtual chromoendoscopy (n = 483). Results The mean adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 34.9 %, and the adenoma per colonoscopy rate (APCR) was 2.1. No significant differences were noted between the three endoscopy systems. Moreover, no differences in ADR or APCR were observed between the four imaging modalities. High definition white-light colonoscopy resulted in a significantly higher detection of sessile serrated adenomas (8.2 % vs. 3.8 %; P < 0.01) and adenocarcinomas (2.6 % vs. 0.5 %; P < 0.05) compared with the conventional procedure. Conclusions No significant differences in ADR or APCR between different endoscopy systems, high definition, and/or virtual chromoendoscopy could be observed in routine colonoscopies in the general population. High definition endoscopy was associated with a significantly higher detection rate of serrated adenomas and adenocarcinomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document