Metacognition Explains the Gender Differences in Digital Reading Performance: A Multilevel Mediation Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54
Author(s):  
Hangyan Yu
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Mediation Analysis ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Digital Reading ◽  
Multilevel Mediation ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Data Source

Gender differences in reading have become a heated topic, and a reoccurring pattern of results is that girls outperform boys significantly. As digital reading prevails, the discrepancies in digital reading between girls and boys are also prominent. For the purpose of exploring the reason why boys lag behind in terms of digital reading performance and therefore unveil the underlying mechanism in improving students' digital reading literacy, this study used multilevel mediation analysis to investigate whether students' metacognition, i.e., metacognition of understanding, remembering, summarizing and assessing credibility, explain the gender differences in digital reading performance. This study adopted Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), launched by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as the data source. Results of 12,058 samples from 361 schools in China showed that their better achievement in metacognition significantly mediated girls' excelling performance in digital reading. Pedagogical implementations focusing on metacognition were given to render help for both genders in digital reading performance.

scholarly journals Incidence of a Non-Sustainability Use of Technology on Students’ Reading Performance in Pisa

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esteban Vázquez-Cano ◽  
José Gómez-Galán ◽  
Alfonso Infante-Moro ◽  
Eloy López-Meneses
Keyword(s):  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Reading Competence ◽  
Digital Devices ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Academic Activities ◽  
Variance Explained ◽  
At Home

This article describes an investigation that made a comparative analysis of the influence of the use of technology for non-academic activities on the reading performance of students in 21 countries within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), as measured by the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). To do this, we coded the SumIC001-008-010 variables (“Devices available at home” and “How often do you use digital devices for the following activities outside school”) in the PISA survey and quantified the effect by the proportion of variance explained of each variable in the model for each country. The results show that the reading score increases according to the variable for type and quantity of devices at home but falls drastically in all 21 countries when the “SumIC001” variable exceeds 15 points. Our research also found that the two activities that most negatively impacted reading performance if done on a regular basis were “playing online games via social networks” and “uploading your own created contents.” These results would seem to confirm that the non-sustainability and prolonged use of technology outside school is objectively negative for the development of reading competence in young people.

scholarly journals The intergenerational effect of parental enthusiasm for reading

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (84) ◽  
pp. 239-259
Author(s):  
Jose G. Clavel ◽  
Mauro Mediavilla
Keyword(s):  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Reading For Pleasure ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This paper aims to focus on how reading for pleasure is transmitted within the family. Using data taken from the Programme for International Student Assessment test of 2009, which dealt in depth with the reading proficiency of students, the authors show that children of parents who read for pleasure are better readers. Within the extensive research and published results on reading performance, the authors focused on the transmission of parents’ reading attitudes to their children. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the authors have opted for an approach of “difference in differences”, applied to a population that represents all 15-year-olds from five countries (Germany, Denmark, Hungary, Italy and Portugal). To support this study, the authors chose as a response variable the difference between reading performance and maths performance of each student, taking into account five plausible values for each student. The authors have several explanatory variables, among them what we call the “treatment”, which is the parents’ enthusiasm for reading. Findings The calculated estimations clearly indicate that there is a positive effect for four out of the five countries analysed, ranging from 4 points for Italy to 6.5 points for Germany and Portugal. As for the significance of the effect, with the exception of Hungary, the result is reliable and robust. It should also be noted that the variable that indicates the existence of a reading habit by children (daily reading for pleasure) is seen as a factor that positively affects the difference between competence in reading and mathematics in four out of the five countries analysed. Originality value The results show positive effects on children whose parents read for pleasure, and this fact should be used to further encourage parents to promote their own reading time for pleasure. In view of the already quantified trend in international reports that adults are reading less, it seems crucial to involve educational authorities in reversing this phenomenon, knowing the impact that adult reading habits have on the reading competence of young people.

A case of being the same? Australia and New Zealand’s reading in focus

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-263
Author(s):  
Megan C. Chamberlain ◽  
Emma J. Medina
Keyword(s):  
Sense Of Belonging ◽  
International Student ◽  
Contextual Information ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Reading Literacy ◽  
Indigenous Students ◽  
Primary Schooling ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Educational Challenges

Australia and New Zealand have participated in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment since 2000. Reading literacy was the main focus of the Programme for International Student Assessment in 2000, and at that time both countries’ students generally performed well above the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development average. Nearly 20 years later, in the latest cycle of the Programme for International Student Assessment in 2018, reading literacy was again the main focus. Students’ average reading performance has tracked down in both countries. Large inequities persist between socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged students, indigenous and non-indigenous students, and genders. The Programme for International Student Assessment gathers a wealth of contextual information that highlights key educational challenges facing both countries, including poor disciplinary climates, declining attitudes towards reading and sense of belonging at school, and increasing bullying. While there are similarities among the two countries’ 15-year-olds, evidence shows practices are diverging at the middle primary schooling level, which may be impacting positively on younger Australian cohorts; these differences are also discussed with respect to early reading experiences.

scholarly journals MATHEMATICAL LITERACY ABILITY OF CAMPER TYPE STUDENTS BASED ON GENDER DIFFERENCES

MaPan ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-299
Author(s):  
Ma'rup Ma'rup ◽  
◽  
Andi Husniati ◽  
Muhammad Rizal Usman ◽  
Kristiawati Kristiawati
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Male Student ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Response Profile ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Literacy Ability

This study illustrated the mathematical literacy ability of camper type students based on gender differences. The subject of this study were class X MIA students of SMAN 2 Takalar. This study is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach design. The data processed is Adversity Quotient data and students’ mathematical literacy abilities data. Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire was used to find out students with camper type. The test used to see the mathematical literacy ability of male and female students with camper type is PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) question consists of three questions. Interviews were conducted to further explore students' mathematical literacy ability. Based on the data analysis, it was found that the mathematical literacy ability of the camper type female student was higher than the camper type male student.

scholarly journals Students’ Quantitative Literacy in Solving PISA Problem Based on Gender Differences

Jurnal Elemen ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 438-449
Author(s):  
Lestariningsih Lestariningsih ◽  
◽  
Nita Safitri Maulidah ◽  
Moch. Lutfianto ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
International Student ◽  
Female Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Male Student ◽  
Quantitative Literacy ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Tenth Grade

Quantitative literacy is an important skill needed by individuals in solving problems with quantitative situations in daily life. Thus, this paper aimed to identify quantitative literacy in solving the PISA problem based on gender differences. This study used descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Research subjects in this study were two tenth-grade students in middle school. They were one male student and one female student who have the similar mathematical ability. Data were collected by giving the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) problem, especially mathematical literacy, and using the interview method. The research results showed that the quantitative literacy of male student in solving PISA problems is by using fewless symbols to represent time and incomplete algorithms and procedures. In comparison, the quantitative literacy of female student in solving PISA problems is by using a more detailed description, more mathematical operations, and solving the problem according to algorithms and procedures. Furthermore, both students have quantitative literacy aspects, including interpretation, calculation, representation, assumption, analysis, and communication skills. Therefore, the quantitative literacy ability of students can be used as a reference for teachers to determine the modeling activities conducted by students in solving the PISA problem.

Three Paradoxical Effects on Academic Self-Concept Across Countries, Schools, and Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert W. Marsh ◽  
Philip D. Parker ◽  
Reinhard Pekrun
Keyword(s):  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Frame Of Reference ◽  
School Level ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Starting School

Abstract. We simultaneously resolve three paradoxes in academic self-concept research with a single unifying meta-theoretical model based on frame-of-reference effects across 68 countries, 18,292 schools, and 485,490 15-year-old students. Paradoxically, but consistent with predictions, effects on math self-concepts were negative for: • being from countries where country-average achievement was high; explaining the paradoxical cross-cultural self-concept effect; • attending schools where school-average achievement was high; demonstrating big-fish-little-pond-effects (BFLPE) that generalized over 68 countries, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/non-OECD countries, high/low achieving schools, and high/low achieving students; • year-in-school relative to age; unifying different research literatures for associated negative effects for starting school at a younger age and acceleration/skipping grades, and positive effects for starting school at an older age (“academic red shirting”) and, paradoxically, even for repeating a grade. Contextual effects matter, resulting in significant and meaningful effects on self-beliefs, not only at the student (year in school) and local school level (BFLPE), but remarkably even at the macro-contextual country-level. Finally, we juxtapose cross-cultural generalizability based on Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) data used here with generalizability based on meta-analyses, arguing that although the two approaches are similar in many ways, the generalizability shown here is stronger in terms of support for the universality of the frame-of-reference effects.

Are There Test Administrator Effects in Large-Scale Educational Assessments?

Methodology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Lüdtke ◽  
Alexander Robitzsch ◽  
Ulrich Trautwein ◽  
Frauke Kreuter ◽  
Jan Marten Ihme
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Student Groups ◽  
Mathematics Scores ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Sample Attrition ◽  
Educational Assessments ◽  
Test Administrator ◽  
Practical Implications

Abstract. In large-scale educational assessments such as the Third International Mathematics and Sciences Study (TIMSS) or the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), sizeable numbers of test administrators (TAs) are needed to conduct the assessment sessions in the participating schools. TA training sessions are run and administration manuals are compiled with the aim of ensuring standardized, comparable, assessment situations in all student groups. To date, however, there has been no empirical investigation of the effectiveness of these standardizing efforts. In the present article, we probe for systematic TA effects on mathematics achievement and sample attrition in a student achievement study. Multilevel analyses for cross-classified data using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedures were performed to separate the variance that can be attributed to differences between schools from the variance associated with TAs. After controlling for school effects, only a very small, nonsignificant proportion of the variance in mathematics scores and response behavior was attributable to the TAs (< 1%). We discuss practical implications of these findings for the deployment of TAs in educational assessments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document