Multi-GNSS PPP Performance Assessment with Different Ranging Accuracies in Challenging Scenarios

Author(s):  
Javier M�guez ◽  
Jos� V. Perello Gisbert ◽  
Ra�l Orus P�rez ◽  
J. Antonio Garc�a-Molina ◽  
Xavi Serena ◽  
...  
1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Jones ◽  
Eduardo Salas ◽  
Elizabeth W. Pitts ◽  
Gary L. Allen ◽  
Ben B. Morgan

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Lindelius ◽  
E Björkenstam ◽  
C Dahlgren ◽  
R Ljung ◽  
C Stefansson

Author(s):  
M. Vuillet ◽  
L. Peyras ◽  
C. Carvajal ◽  
D. Serre ◽  
Y. Diab

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Dedy Mulyadi ◽  
Didik Purwanto

The question of compensation in addition to sensitive to be driving someone to worl due to an effect on morale and discipline employees. Therefore , any  agency or any organization should be able to provide compensation equal to the workload  to create a workforce that efficient and effective manner can be realized. Amaore than that, the company’s goal to improve performance. Performance assessment is a subjective process that involves human judgments. Thus, performance assessment is very likely wrong and very easily influonced by sources that are not actual, so it must be taken into account and considered reasinable. Frformance appraisals are considered  to meet the target if it has a good impact on new employees who rated their performance. Simple linear regression analysis using SPSS version 12:00 data processing obtained tegression equation Y = 0,487 X 74 + with an explanation of X = award, 74 = constant, 0.487 = coefficient awards, and Y = performance based on simple linear regression equation in case of increase of one unit of the  performance award will be increased 0.487 units. If company policy negates the performance award will remain at a constant rate (74) units . (A) Test results obtained thitung significant constants of (12.574) > t table for (1.960 then reject Ho constanta significant meaning. (B) significant Test award coefficient t count the results obtained by (2.164)> t table foe (1.96) then reject Ho the mean coeffent of appreciation affect the performance . (C) correlation coefficient analysis is done by calculating the product moment corration (pearson)  to test  whether or not a strong  relationship between the variables X  dan Y , based on the results of cakculations with SPSS  table valuse obtained by calculating the  correlation coefficient r (0.3100> r on the table for a = 0,05 (0.291) then reject Ho, which means there is a relationship of respect for performance. When we enter these valuse in the table shows the interpretation of the correlation coefficient between the interval from 0.20 to 0.399 which has a low relationship


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document