scholarly journals Risks and benefits of psychotropic medication in pregnancy: cohort studies based on UK electronic primary care health records

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (23) ◽  
pp. 1-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Petersen ◽  
Rachel L McCrea ◽  
Cormac J Sammon ◽  
David PJ Osborn ◽  
Stephen J Evans ◽  
...  

BackgroundAlthough many women treated with psychotropic medication become pregnant, no psychotropic medication has been licensed for use in pregnancy. This leaves women and their health-care professionals in a treatment dilemma, as they need to balance the health of the woman with that of the unborn child. The aim of this project was to investigate the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication in women treated for psychosis who become pregnant.Objective(s)(1) To provide a descriptive account of psychotropic medication prescribed before pregnancy, during pregnancy and up to 15 months after delivery in UK primary care from 1995 to 2012; (2) to identify risk factors predictive of discontinuation and restarting of lithium (multiple manufacturers), anticonvulsant mood stabilisers and antipsychotic medication; (3) to examine the extent to which pregnancy is a determinant for discontinuation of psychotropic medication; (4) to examine prevalence of records suggestive of adverse mental health, deterioration or relapse 18 months before and during pregnancy, and up to 15 months after delivery; and (5) to estimate absolute and relative risks of adverse maternal and child outcomes of psychotropic treatment in pregnancy.DesignRetrospective cohort studies.SettingPrimary care.ParticipantsWomen treated for psychosis who became pregnant, and their children.InterventionsTreatment with antipsychotics, lithium or anticonvulsant mood stabilisers.Main outcome measuresDiscontinuation and restarting of treatment; worsening of mental health; acute pre-eclampsia/gestational hypertension; gestational diabetes; caesarean section; perinatal death; major congenital malformations; poor birth outcome (low birthweight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low Apgar score); transient poor birth outcomes (tremor, agitation, breathing and muscle tone problems); and neurodevelopmental and behavioural disorders.Data sourcesClinical Practice Research Datalink database and The Health Improvement Network primary care database.ResultsPrescribing of psychotropic medication was relatively constant before pregnancy, decreased sharply in early pregnancy and peaked after delivery. Antipsychotic and anticonvulsant treatment increased over the study period. The recording of markers of worsening mental health peaked after delivery. Pregnancy was a strong determinant for discontinuation of psychotropic medication. However, between 40% and 76% of women who discontinued psychotropic medication before or in early pregnancy restarted treatment by 15 months after delivery. The risk of major congenital malformations, and neurodevelopmental and behavioural outcomes in valproate (multiple manufacturers) users was twice that in users of other anticonvulsants. The risks of adverse maternal and child outcomes in women who continued antipsychotic use in pregnancy were not greater than in those who discontinued treatment before pregnancy.LimitationsA few women would have received parts of their care outside primary care, which may not be captured in this analysis. Likewise, the analyses were based on prescribing data, which may differ from usage.ConclusionsPsychotropic medication is prescribed before, during and after pregnancy. Many women discontinue treatment before or during early pregnancy and then restart again in late pregnancy or after delivery. Our results support previous associations between valproate and adverse child outcomes but we found no evidence of such an association for antipsychotics.Future workFuture research should focus on (1) curtailing the use of sodium valproate; (2) estimating the benefits of psychotropic drug use in pregnancy; and (3) investigating the risks associated with lifestyle choices that are more prevalent among women using psychotropic drugs.Funding detailsThe National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 ◽  
pp. 95-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Petersen ◽  
Shuk-Li Collings ◽  
Rachel L McCrea ◽  
Irwin Nazareth ◽  
David P Osborn ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Steeg ◽  
Matthew J Carr ◽  
Laszlo Trefan ◽  
Darren M Ashcroft ◽  
Nav Kapur ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundA substantial reduction in GP-recorded self-harm occurred during the first wave of COVID-19 but effects on primary care management of self-harm are unknown.AimTo examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical management within three months of an episode of self-harm.Design and settingProspective cohort study using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.MethodWe compared cohorts of patients with an index self-harm episode recorded during a pre-pandemic period (10th March-10th June, 2010-2019) versus the COVID-19 first-wave period (10th March-10th June 2020). Patients were followed up for three months to capture psychotropic medication prescribing, GP/practice nurse consultation and referral to mental health services.Results48,739 episodes of self-harm were recorded during the pre-pandemic period and 4,238 during the first-wave COVID-19 period. Similar proportions were prescribed psychotropic medication within 3 months in the pre-pandemic (54.0%) and COVID-19 first-wave (54.9%) cohorts. Likelihood of having at least one GP/practice nurse consultation was broadly similar (83.2% vs. 80.3% in the COVID-19 cohort). The proportion of patients referred to mental health services in the COVID-19 cohort (3.4%) was around half of that in the pre-pandemic cohort (6.5%).ConclusionDespite the challenges experienced by primary healthcare teams during the initial COVID-19 wave, prescribing and consultation patterns following self-harm were broadly similar to pre-pandemic levels. However, the reduced likelihood of referral to mental health services warrants attention. Accessible outpatient and community services for people who have self-harmed are required as the COVID-19 crisis recedes and the population faces new challenges to mental health.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S215
Author(s):  
A. Bérard ◽  
O. Sheehy ◽  
J. Gorgui ◽  
J. Zhao ◽  
C. Moura ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 310 (15) ◽  
pp. 1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Pasternak ◽  
Henrik Svanström ◽  
Ditte Mølgaard-Nielsen ◽  
Mads Melbye ◽  
Anders Hviid

2010 ◽  
Vol 362 (23) ◽  
pp. 2185-2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke Jentink ◽  
Maria A. Loane ◽  
Helen Dolk ◽  
Ingeborg Barisic ◽  
Ester Garne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document