scholarly journals Oczekiwanie zmiany nastawienia credit ratings banków a kursy akcji przy uwzględnieniu poziomu rozwoju gospodarczego kraju

2017 ◽  
pp. 105-120
Author(s):  
Patrycja Chodnicka-Jaworska
Keyword(s):  
Credit Rating ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Credit Ratings ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Rates Of Return ◽  
Share Prices ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Event Study Method ◽  
Independent Variable

The aim of the paper is verification of the following hypothesis the share prices of banks have stronger reaction to bank credit rating announcements changes for a downgrade, both in developed and developing economies. The analysis(event study method) has been based on data from Thomson Reuters for the years 1980-2015 for 24 countries. Outlooks and watch lists proposed by all credit rating agencies have been used as an independent variable. Daily differences between the logarithmized rates of return of banks' shares have been used as dependent variable.

scholarly journals Wpływ COVID-19 na nastawienie i credit ratingi krajów

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-564
Author(s):  
Patrycja Chodnicka-Jaworska
Keyword(s):  
Financial Crisis ◽  
Foreign Currency ◽  
Credit Rating ◽  
Credit Ratings ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The International Monetary Fund

Covid-19 Impact on Countires’ Outlooks and Credit Ratings The aim of the study is to examine the impact of the financial crisis caused by COVID-19 on chang­es in outlooks and credit ratings of major rating agencies. The research hypothesis was as follows: the financial crisis caused by COVID-19 negatively affected the change in outlooks and credit ratings of countries. The study used long-term and short-term credit ratings and outlooks collected from the Thomson Reuters / Refinitiv database regarding liabilities expressed in foreign currency and macroeconomic data from the International Monetary Fund databases, for 2010–2021. The analysis was carried out using ordered logit panel models. The presented results showed a weak significant im­pact of the COVID-19 pandemic on credit rating. The agency that changed its notes in connection with this situation is Standard & Poor’s (S&P). However, the attitude responded to the situation un­der investigation. During the crisis, country ratings have become less sensitive to growing debt, which may be dictated by widespread loosening of fiscal policy. The rate of GDP growth has a par­ticular impact during the COVID-19 period in the event of a change of outlook. Rising inflation is particularly dangerous in the age of pandemics. It may be related to monetary policy easing.

scholarly journals BANK CREDIT RATINGS AS A RELIABILITY INDEX: (OBJECTIVITY OR A FINANCIAL MARKET DEMAND)

Banking law ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 7-19
Author(s):  
Gulnara F. Ruchkina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Market ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Credit Rating ◽  
Credit Ratings ◽  
Bank Credit ◽  
Credit Rating Agencies ◽  
Financial Indicators ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
The Law

Separate provisions of the law regulating the activities of credit rating agencies are analyzed. Attention is drowned to the implementation of the provisions of this law, which is implemented by by-laws of the Bank of Russia. Examples of ratings assigned to banks by financial supermarkets are given, as well as up-to-date information in the form of tables about credit ratings assigned to banks. It are concluded that the ratings assigned to banks are more informative in comparison with the financial indicators of banks posted on official websites, as part of the assessment of their financial reliability.

scholarly journals ESG as a Measure of Credit Ratings

Risks ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 226
Author(s):  
Patrycja Chodnicka-Jaworska
Keyword(s):  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Credit Rating ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Credit Ratings ◽  
Stock Exchanges ◽  
Credit Rating Agencies ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Rating Changes ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) measures on credit ratings given to non-financial institutions by the largest credit rating agencies according to economic sector divisions. The hypotheses were as follows: a strong negative impact on non-financial institutions’ credit rating changes will result from ESG risk changes, and the reaction of credit rating changes will vary in different sectors. Panel event models were used to verify these hypotheses. The study used data from the Thomson Reuters Database for the period 2010–2020. The analysis was based on the literature on credit rating determinants and on papers and reports on COVID-19, ESG factors, and their impact on credit rating changes. Linear decomposition was used for the analysis. To verify these hypotheses, long-term issuer credit ratings presented by Moody’s and Fitch for European companies listed on these stock exchanges have been used. In the analyses, financial and non-financial factors were also considered. The results suggested that, within the last year, the methodology presented by credit rating agencies has changed, and ESG factors are one of the basic measures that are used to verify credit rating changes, especially those related to the pandemic.

Uncertain Meanings of Risk

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Besedovsky
Keyword(s):  
Financial Markets ◽  
Credit Rating ◽  
Traditional Approach ◽  
Credit Ratings ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Structured Finance ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
Measures Of Risk ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
Ontological Uncertainty

This chapter studies calculative risk-assessment practices in credit rating agencies. It identifies two fundamentally different methodological approaches for producing ratings, which in turn shape the respective conceptions of credit risk. The traditional approach sees ‘risk’ as an only partially calculable and predictable set of hazards that should be avoided or minimized. This approach is particularly evident in the production of country credit ratings and gives rise to ordinal rankings of risk. By contrast, structured finance rating practices conceive of ‘risk’ as both fully calculable and controllable; they construct cardinal measures of risk by assuming that ontological uncertainty does not exist and that models can capture all possible events in a probabilistic manner. This assumption—that uncertainty can be turned into measurable risk—is a necessary precondition for structured finance securities and has become an influential imaginary in financial markets.

scholarly journals Analysis of Determinants of Split Ratings and Rating Conservativeness between Japanese and US Credit Rating Agencies

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiki Shimizu ◽  
Junghee Lee ◽  
Hideki Takei
Keyword(s):  
Credit Rating ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Credit Rating Agencies ◽  
Bond Ratings ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
Thomson Reuters ◽  
Asset Liquidity ◽  
The Us ◽  
Japanese Companies ◽  
Split Ratings

In the previous paper, we confirmed the existence of the split ratings between Japanese and US credit rating agencies (CRAs). Our study did not support early studies suggesting that the split ratings were merely random occurrences. Rather, our findings suggested that the split ratings occurring between Japanese and US CRAs were not random and frequently occurring. The Japanese CRA assigned less conservative ratings than the US CRAs. In this paper, we performed the multivariate regression analysis to find variables which would differentiate the degree of rating conservativeness. Our samples were 192 Japanese companies which were assigned their ratings by Japanese and US credit rating agencies. We used 10-year bond ratings of these companies from 2000 and 2009. Our data sources were Nikkei NEEDS-Financial Quest for Japanese ratings and financial information and Thomson Reuters Datastream for US ratings. All financial data of the 192 firms were collected from Nikkei NEEDS-Financial Quest. According to our findings, Japanese agency seems to put higher weight on ROA than US agencies while all agencies seem to use variables such as asset, liquidity, and leverage to assign ratings. We assume that this is the main variable that has differentiated the degree of rating conservativeness.

scholarly journals Three Letters that Move the Markets: Credit Ratings between Market Information and Legal Regulation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich G. Schroeter
Keyword(s):  
Financial Markets ◽  
Applied Research ◽  
Credit Rating ◽  
Credit Ratings ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Regulations ◽  
Market Information ◽  
Market Reactions ◽  
Rating Agencies ◽  
Sovereign Credit Ratings

Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance, Vol. 6, No. 1 (2011), pp. 14-30As demonstrated by the market reactions to downgrades of various sovereign credit ratings in 2011, the credit rating agencies occupy an important role in today’s globalized financial markets. This article provides an overview of the central characteristics of credit ratings and discusses risks arising from both their widespread use as market information and from the increasing references to credit ratings contained in laws, legal regulations and private contracts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document