scholarly journals The Combination of Prognostic Nutritional Indicator and Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen is Useful in Predicting Postoperative Recurrence in Stage II Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-183
Author(s):  
Chihiro Uejima ◽  
Hiroaki Saito ◽  
Yoichiro Tada ◽  
Akimitsu Tanio ◽  
Yuki Murakami ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenhui Li ◽  
Dafu Zhang ◽  
Xiaolin Pang ◽  
Shan Yan ◽  
Ming Lei ◽  
...  

BackgroundWhether elevated postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are prognostic in patients with stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial.Patients and MethodsPrimary and sensitivity analysis populations were obtained from a retrospective, multicenter longitudinal cohort including consecutive patients without neoadjuvant treatment undergoing curative resection for stage I–III CRC. Serum CEA levels before (CEApre-m1) and within 1 (CEApost-m1), 2–3 (CEApost-m2–3), and 4–6 months (CEApost-m4–6) after surgery were obtained, and their associations with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Cox regression. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.ResultsPrimary and sensitivity analysis populations included 710 [415 men; age, 54.8 (11.6) years] and 1556 patients [941 men; age, 56.2 (11.8) years], respectively. Recurrence hazard ratios (HRs) in the elevated CEApre-m1, CEApost-m1, CEApost-m2–3, and CEApost-m4–6 groups were 1.30 (95% CI: 0.91–1.85), 1.53 (95% CI: 0.89–2.62), 1.88 (95% CI: 1.08–3.28), and 1.15 (95% CI: 0.91–1.85), respectively. The HRs of the elevated CEApre-m1, CEApost-m1, CEApost-m2–3, and CEApost-m4–6 groups for OS were 1.09 (95% CI: 0.60–1.97), 2.78 (95% CI: 1.34–5.79), 2.81 (95% CI: 1.25–6.30), and 3.30 (95% CI: 1.67–.536), respectively. Adjusted multivariate analyses showed that both in the primary and sensitivity analysis populations, elevated CEApost-m2–3, rather than CEApre-m1, CEApost-m1, and CEApost-m4–6, was an independent risk factor for recurrence, but not for OS. The RFS in the elevated and normal CEApost-m2–3 groups differed significantly among patients with stage II disease [n = 266; HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.02–8.24 (primary analysis); n = 612; HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.34–5.38 (sensitivity analysis)].ConclusionsElevated postoperative CEA levels are prognostic in patients with stage II CRC, with 2–3 months after surgery being the optimal timing for CEA measurement.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiana Iacuzzo ◽  
Paola Germani ◽  
Marina Troian ◽  
Tommaso Cipolat Mis ◽  
Fabiola Giudici ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Ibrahim ◽  
Khalil Saleh ◽  
Viviane Track-smayra ◽  
Nelly Ziade ◽  
Dalia Sarraf ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
An-Ting T. Lu ◽  
Shelley R. Salpeter ◽  
Anthony E. Reeve ◽  
Steven Eschrich ◽  
Patrick G. Johnston ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document