scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrolithotomy-a versatile technique for both simple and complex renal stone

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-103
Author(s):  
TMS Hossain ◽  
M Asaduzzaman ◽  
MN Uddin ◽  
MH Rahman ◽  
MU Jahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
First Line ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Versatile Technique ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Puncture Technique

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is currently the preferred first line treatment for simple & complex renal calculi. The technique also being used increasingly for smaller stones that have failed ESWL. Aim of the study is to share our experience in PCNL in course of time. This study was conducted from January 2009 to December 2012, 131 patient’s with 142 renal units of 5-75 yrs of age, PCNL were performed in NIKDU, BSMMU & JBFH. Stone were classified into simple (isolated renal pelvis or isolated calyceal stones) or complex (partial or complete staghorn stones, renal pelvic stone with accompanying calyceal stones). The stone size was 1.5-5cm approximately. We asses our initial puncture technique, need for multi-tract, supra 12th rib access, stone free rate, operative duration, postoperative complication, number of transfusion and hospital stay. Operative durations were 60 min -180 minutes. Puncture technique improved in course of time. 14 patients need multi-puncture and tract, all are supra 12th access. Out of 142 renal units 120 (83%) were stone free after first procedure, another 22 need and auxiliary procedure, (5 2nd look PCNL, 6 URS, 11 ESWL) to become stone free result in a 95% stone free rate. Complications occurred in 17 procedures which dealt accordingly. This study revealed PCNL is an effective, versatile safe and cosmetically acceptable procedure for all age groups in simple and complex renal stone. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v39i3.20308 Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2013; 39: 99-103

scholarly journals The Safety and Efficacy of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy During Learning Curve

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Bikash Bikram Thapa ◽  
Bina Basnet ◽  
Bikash Bahadur Rayamajhi ◽  
Narayan Thapa ◽  
Bharat Bhadur Bhandari
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Medium Size ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Access Sheath ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Free Rate

Introduction: Since its introduction in 1976, percutaneous renal stone surgery has undergone several modifications. Reduction in size of access sheath was one of them which was first reported by Jackman in 1998. The miniaturisation of access sheath in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy surgery has significantly reduced the intervention related morbidity with similar outcome as of standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study where a single surgeon without previous experience of independent PCNL surgery performed Mini PCNL under controlled condition for renal stone sized 10 to 30 mm. The outcome was measured in terms of stone free rate and postoperative complications. The association of stone free rate and drop in haemoglobin level with different preoperative and operative variables were calculated with Pearson’s correlation test and p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Mini PCNL was performed in total of 63 renal units. The mean age was 37.8 ± 9.9 years with male: female ratio of 1.8:1. The average stone size was 16.8 ± 2.9 mm. The mean operative time was 55.2 ± 19.0 (30-110) minutes. The stone free rate was 98.2 ± 3.6 %. The mean drop in haemoglobin was 1.3 ± 0.8 and blood transfusion rate was 4.7%. The average hospital stay was 2.6 ± 1.3 days. The grade I complications was 15.8% and grade II and III was 7.9% each. Stone free rate was significantly associated with stone number (r = -0.47, p = 0.004). Similarly fall in haemoglobin was associated with total operative time (r = 0.49, p = 0.003). The stone size, hardness of stone (HU) and size of access sheath had no significant association with stone free rate and fall in haemoglobin. Conclusions: Mini PCNL is as effective as standard PCNL with higher safety margin in small and medium size stone (10 to 30 mm) during learning curve of endo-urology procedure.  

scholarly journals Prediction of the stone free rate by using the guy's stone score after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-200
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shafikul Islam ◽  
Muhammad Hossain ◽  
Md. Saiful Islam ◽  
AKM Khurshidul Alam ◽  
Md. Habibur Rahman Dulal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Normal Body Mass Index ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Residual Stone ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Grade Iii

Background: Urolithiasis is one of the common diseases of the urinary system, with an incidence of approximately 5-10% among the general population. Among the minimally invasive surgeries, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard therapy for large and/or complex renal stones. Objective: The study was carried out to predict the stone-free rate after PCNL by using the Guy's stone score. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, (BSMMU), Dhaka from February 2016 to January 2017. The patients with renal stone attending the outpatient department who met the criteria of standard PCNL. Results: Atotal of 52 patients with renal stone were included in this study.  The mean age was to be found 45.3±14.0 with range of 18 to 73 years. Male to female ratio was 3.3:1. Almost three fourth (74.5%) patients had normal body mass index. All patients had normal anatomy. More than half 27 of the (51.9%) patients had found grade I, 10 (19.2%) Grade II, 11(21.2%) Grade III and 4 (7.7%) Grade IV. Nearly two third 34 (65.4%) patients were found total stone cleared and 18(34.6%) had residual stone. Cleared stone was found 23(85.2%) in grade I, 7(70.0%) grade II, 3(27.3%) in grade III and 1(25.0%) in grade IV. Conclusion: Based on the study findings, it may be concluded that higher the GSS less the stone free rate.It will help in better patient counseling preoperatively, and to predict the need for ancillary treatment.

scholarly journals Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaqiao Zhang ◽  
Chuou Xu ◽  
Deng He ◽  
Yuchao Lu ◽  
Henglong Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Stone ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Ureteral Stenting ◽  
Free Rate

Purpose To clarify the outcome of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for management of renal calculi without preoperative stenting. Methods A total of 171 patients who received 176 fURS procedures for unilateral renal stones were reviewed. All procedures were divided into two groups depending on whether they received ureteral stenting preoperatively. Baseline characteristics of patients, stone burden, operation time, stone-free rates, and complications were compared between both groups. Results Successful primary access to the renal pelvis was achieved in 104 of 114 (91.2%) patients without preoperative stenting, while all procedures with preoperative stenting (n = 62) were successfully performed. A total of 156 procedures were included for further data analysis (56 procedures in stenting group and 100 in non-stenting group). No significant differences was found regardless of a preoperative stent placement in terms of stone-free rate (73.2% with stenting vs. 71.0% without, P = 0.854), operative time (70.4 ± 32.8 with stenting vs. 70.2 ± 32.1 without, P = 0.969). Conclusions fURS for management of renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting are associated with well outcome in short term follow-up. Our study may help patients and doctors to decide if an optional stent is placed or not.

Flank Suspended Supine Position for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Tie-jun ◽  
Li Gong-cheng ◽  
Ye Zhang-qun ◽  
Wen Han-dong ◽  
Shen Guo-qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Pleural Cavity ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Positioning Method ◽  
Free Rate

Aims Prone and supine positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy are widely used but have their drawbacks. We report a new positioning method called “flank suspended supine position” (FSSP) for PCNL and describe our experience with PCNL in this position to evaluate its safety and efficacy. Methods Retrospective study of 150 cases of renal stone patients treated with PCNL in a new position called flank suspended supine position (FSSP) from June 2009 to July 2010. All patients were treated with PCNL in FSSP under epidural anesthesia. Operation time, bleeding rate, stone free rate, and complications were recorded. Results All patients tolerated FSSP. Mean operation time was 78.29±26.13 min. Initial stone-free rate was 83%. For those with residual stones (26 cases), 18 were stone-free after a second PCNL, 8 after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Mean hospital stay was 7.63±2.39 days. No penetrating injury of the pleural cavity or injury to visceral organs was reported. Summary FSSP is an effective and safe position for PCNL in our hands and its effectiveness relative to traditional prone position needs to be determined in future randomized studies.

scholarly journals Factors affecting stone free rate of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi: a single center experience of 15 years

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Widi Atmoko ◽  
Ponco Birowo ◽  
Nur Rasyid
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Staghorn Calculi ◽  
Stone Burden ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
History Of ◽  
Renal Stone Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Free Rate

Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi is challenging for urologists because it is difficult to remove all of the stones. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associated factors of stone-free rate after primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi in a large series of patients at a single, tertiary referral, endourologic stone center. Methods: We collected data from medical record between January 2000 and December 2015. A total of 345 primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were performed for patients with staghorn calculi. This study included both and made no distinction between partial and complete staghorn calculi. Stone-free is defined as the absence of residual stones after undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the first time. Significant factors from univariate analysis that correlated with stone-free rate after primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn stone were further analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. Results: The mean patient age was 52.23±10.38 years. The stone-free rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy was 62.6%. The mean operating time was 79.55±34.46 minutes. The mean length of stay in hospital was 4.29±3.00 days. Using the chi-square test, history of ipsilateral open renal stone surgery (p = 0.01), stone burden (p = < 0.001), and type of anesthesia (p = 0.04) had a significant impact on the stone-free. From multivariate analysis, the history of ipsilateral open renal stone surgery [OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.81; p 0.01] and the stone burden [OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.18-0.45; p 0.00] were significant independent risk factors for stone-free.

scholarly journals Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stone

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S I Ragy ◽  
A A Elshorbagy ◽  
M A Alzqzouq
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Alternative Therapy ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Objective Compare the outcomes of RIRS and PCNL for the treatment of 1 to 2 cm lower calyceal renal calculi regarding the stone free rate, operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay and complication rate. Materials and Methods Patients with a single lower calyceal stone with an evidence of a CT diameter between 1 and 2 cm were enrolled in this randomized study. Patients were randomized into two groups: group 1: underwent RIRS (20pts); group 2: underwent PCNL (20 pts). Patients were evaluated with KUB and CT after one month. Results Mean fluoroscopy times and Hospital stay were significantly greater in the PCNL group than in RIRS group, In the RIRS group, the stone-free rate was 85% (17/20 patients); this rate increased to 95% after a second intervention. After a single PCNL procedure, 19 of 20 (95%) patients were completely stone free and For complications, there were minimal differences in both procedures, except for hemorrhage three patients who were treated with PCNL need blood transfusion Conclusions PCNL and RIRS are safe and effective methods for medium-sized LP calculi. For selected patients, RIRS may represent an alternative therapy to PCNL, with acceptable efficacy and low morbidity., RIRS compared to PCNL offers the best outcome in terms of radiation exposure and hospital stay.

scholarly journals Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score for Predicting Stone-Free Rate after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e65888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Wook Jeong ◽  
Jin-Woo Jung ◽  
Woo Heon Cha ◽  
Byung Ki Lee ◽  
Sangchul Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Complexity Score ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
National University ◽  
Seoul National University ◽  
Free Rate

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udaya Man Singh Dongol ◽  
Yugal Limbu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Free Rate

Background: Renal stone disease is a common problem in children in developing countries. Its prevalence in children varies from 5% to 15%. It is suggested that anatomic abnormalities, recurrent urinary tract infections, metabolic disturbances, dietary and environmental factors are the predisposing factors.The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.Methods: Between May 2012 and Dec 2016, 25 children with renal stone diseases underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy and were evaluated for stone free rate, complications, blood transfusion rate, sandwich therapy, etc.Results: The mean age of children was 9.3 years (7-15 years) and the mean size of the stone was 20 mm (13-27 mm). The anatomical location of stone was important in terms of stone clearance. Three patients needed blood transfusion. The overall stone free rate was 88% before discharge. Three patients had residual stones and were treated with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Complications included fever, haematuria, ileus and urine leak. No major complications were noted. There were no significant differences in haemoglobin and creatinine levels before and 12 hours after the surgery.Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be considered a safe, effective and feasible modality of treatment for children with an average of 2 cm sized renal stones.

scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrolithotomy through superior calyceal approach - our experience

Pulse ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
AU Shaikh ◽  
R Biswas ◽  
NUM Arif ◽  
N Miah ◽  
W Zaman
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Stone Clearance ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Percutaneous Punctures ◽  
Main Complication

Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered the treatment of choice for large (> 2 cm size) renal stones at present. Aim of this study was to evaluate the results of PCNL as monotherapy in our centre which were done through superior calyceal approach.Materials and Methods: Seventy five patients with three bilateral renal stone (total 78 renal units) that underwent PCNL through superior calyceal approach at Apollo Hospitals Dhaka from May 15, 2005 to December 15, 2007 were included in this retrospective study. Selected patients had renal stones more than 2 cm in size (average stone size 35 mm and surface area 750 mm2). Ultrasonogram, intravenous urogram and in some selected cases CT scan were done to detect the location and size of the stone. Urologist performed percutaneous punctures through superior calyx in prone position under fluoroscopic guidance and general anaesthesia were employed in all cases. Post-operative stone clearance was documented on plain X-ray KUB and ultrasonogram KUB.Results: PCNL was successfully (complete stone clearance and insignificant residue) carried out in 68 patients (69 renal units). Average stone clearance was 88.46%. No second look procedures were needed. Uro-sepsis was the main complication, occurred in 9 renal units (11.53 %) while urinary leakage/ fistula in 6.41%, significant bleeding in 6 renal units (7.69 %) and pleural breach with fluid in pleural cavity (hydrothorax) in 2 (2.6 %) cases. Mean blood transfusion was 1.2 units and mean hospital stay was 67 hours.Conclusion: Monotherapy with PCNL is highly effective in the treatment of large volume renal calculi and staghorn calculi using superior calyceal supracostal and subcostal approach. As a minimally invasive procedure, it is quite safe in experienced hand.Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Renal stone, Superior calyceal puncture, Staghorn calculiDOI: 10.3329/pulse.v3i1.6543Pulse Vol.3(1) July 2009 p4-6

scholarly journals Factors affecting stone free rate of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi: a single center experience of 15 years

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Widi Atmoko ◽  
Ponco Birowo ◽  
Nur Rasyid
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Staghorn Calculi ◽  
Stone Burden ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
History Of ◽  
Renal Stone Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Free Rate

Objectives: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi is challenging for urologists because it is difficult to remove all of the stones. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associated factors of stone-free rate after primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy on staghorn calculi in a large series of patients at a single, tertiary referral, endourologic stone center. Methods: We collected data from medical record between January 2000 and December 2015. A total of 345 primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were performed for patients with staghorn calculi. This study included both and made no distinction between partial and complete staghorn calculi. Stone-free is defined as the absence of residual stones after undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the first time. Significant factors from univariate analysis that correlated with stone-free rate after primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn stone were further analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. Results: The mean patient age was 52.23±10.38 years. The stone-free rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy was 62.6%. The mean operating time was 79.55±34.46 minutes. The mean length of stay in hospital was 4.29±3.00 days. Using the chi-square test, history of ipsilateral open renal stone surgery (p = 0.01), stone burden (p = < 0.001), and type of anesthesia (p = 0.04) had a significant impact on the stone-free. From multivariate analysis, the history of ipsilateral open renal stone surgery [OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.28-0.81; p 0.01] and the stone burden [OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.18-0.45; p 0.00] were significant independent risk factors for stone-free.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document