scholarly journals Immunophenotypic characteristics of Diffuse Large Bcell Lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1049-1052
Author(s):  
SM Mahbubul Alam ◽  
Ahmed Khaled

Introduction: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is essential in the diagnostic workup of Diffuse Large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Determination of biological heterogenicity of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is critical to institute precise treatment and predict prognosis. IHC confirms B cell phenotypes, reflects molecular subtype based on cell of origin and determines other immunophenotypic characteristics. Methods and Material: All cases of DLBCL diagnosed in 2020 (Jan-Dec) in histopathology department of Evercare Hospital Dhaka were included in this study. Histopathological sections were stained with CD20, CD3, CD5, CD30, BCL2, BCL6, CD10, MUM1, MYC, Ki67 and other markers. Hans algorithm was applied to classify DLBCL cases into germinal center B-cell (GCB) or Non-GCB. Results: Out of 64 DLBCL cases, 21 (24%) of DLBCL were GCB, while 76% (43 cases) were non-GCB subtypes. 30% cases of DLBCL showed double expression for MYC and BCL2. Fewer cases were immunoreactive for CD5 and CD30. Conclusion: This first study at Dhaka with wide range of antibody to characterize the Immunophenotypic features of DLBCL. The main finding of this study is the identification of non-germinal center B-cell (non-GCB) as the major immunophenotype of DLBCL. This may be an enabler for further studies to observe the clinical outcome of different subtypes of GCB and Non-GCB. Bioresearch Commu. 8(1): 1049-1052, 2022 (January)

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31) ◽  
pp. 3538-3546 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Kathryn S. Kolibaba ◽  
James A. Reeves ◽  
Anil Tulpule ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate the impact of the addition of bortezomib to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) on outcomes in previously untreated patients with non–germinal center B-cell–like (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods After real-time determination of non-GCB DLBCL using the Hans immunohistochemistry algorithm, 206 patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by International Prognostic Index [IPI] score) to six 21-day cycles of standard R-CHOP alone or R-CHOP plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 4 (VR-CHOP). The primary end point, progression-free survival (PFS), was evaluated in 183 patients with centrally confirmed non-GCB DLBCL who received one or more doses of study drug (91 R-CHOP, 92 VR-CHOP). Results After a median follow-up of 34 months, with 25% (R-CHOP) and 18% (VR-CHOP) of patients having had PFS events, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.73 (90% CI, 0.43 to 1.24) with VR-CHOP ( P = .611). Two-year PFS rates were 77.6% with R-CHOP and 82.0% with VR-CHOP; they were 65.1% versus 72.4% in patients with high-intermediate/high IPI (HR, 0.67; 90% CI, 0.34 to 1.29), and 90.0% versus 88.9% (HR, 0.85; 90% CI, 0.35 to 2.10) in patients with low/low-intermediate IPI. Overall response rate with R-CHOP and VR-CHOP was 98% and 96%, respectively. The overall survival HR was 0.75 (90% CI, 0.38 to 1.45); 2-year survival rates were 88.4% and 93.0%, respectively. In the safety population (100 R-CHOP and 101 VR-CHOP patients), grade ≥ 3 adverse events included neutropenia (53% v 49%), thrombocytopenia (13% v 29%), anemia (7% v 15%), leukopenia (26% v 25%), and neuropathy (1% v 5%). Conclusion Outcomes for newly diagnosed, prospectively enrolled patients with non-GCB DLBCL were more favorable than expected with R-CHOP and were not significantly improved by adding bortezomib.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1017-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
Pedro Farinha ◽  
Beverly P. Nelson ◽  
Adekunle Raji ◽  
...  

Purpose Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) controls the expression of genes in response to hypoxia, as well as a wide range of other cellular processes. We previously showed constitutive stabilization of HIF-1α in the majority of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To our knowledge, the prognostic significance of HIF in lymphoma has never been investigated. Patients and Methods We studied the immunohistochemical protein expression of HIF-1α on tissue microarrays from 153 patients with DLBCL treated in sequential cohorts with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, oncovin, and prednisone (CHOP) or rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) from 1999 to 2002. Results were correlated with patient outcome. Results Median follow-up for all patients was 80 months. Among all patients, HIF-1α was expressed in 62% of germinal center and 59% of non–germinal center patients. With HIF-1α analyzed as a dependent variable, there were no survival differences in CHOP-treated patients. In the R-CHOP group, however, HIF-1α protein expression correlated with significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Five-year PFS for HIF-1α–positive patients was 71% v 43% for HIF-1α–negative patients (P = .0187), whereas 5-year OS was 75% and 54%, respectively (P = .025). In multivariate analysis with International Prognostic Index criteria, HIF-1α remained a significant predictor for PFS (P = .026) and OS (P = .043). Compared with other biomarkers, HIF-1α correlated only with BCL6 (P = .004). In terms of gene expression, we found several common gene associations of HIF-1α and the stromal-1 signature with genes predominantly involved in regulation of the extracellular matrix (eg, BGN, COL1A2, COL5A1, and PLOD2). Conclusion The expression of HIF-1α protein is an important independent favorable prognostic factor for survival in patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18531-18531
Author(s):  
W. Kim ◽  
Y. Oh ◽  
C. Park

18531 Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be subdivided into germinal center B cell-like (GCB) and non- germinal center B cell-like (Non-GC) types by immunohistochemical profiling. Previous studies showed better survival rate for the GCB groups. CD44 is necessary for tumor spread and metastasis and its expression is generally associated with unfavorable prognosis. We analyzed the expression and prognostic significance of standard isoform CD44s and its variant isoform CD44v6 in DLBCL types. Methods: Tissue microarray blocks were created from 52 nodal DLBCL with control tissue. Immunohistochemical staining for CD10, Bcl-6, MUM-1, CD44s, and CD44v6 were performed. The median follow-up period was 44 months. Results: Nodal DLBCLs were subclassified into GCB [CD10+ or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=17 (33%)] and non-GC subgroups [CD10-/Bcl6- or CD10-/Bcl6+/MUM1+, n=35 (67%)]. CD44s expression appeared more on non-GC cases of DLBCL (p=0.04). CD44s and CD44v6 did not result in any difference according to tumor stage, IPI scores, LDH levels. Upon survival analysis, CD44s and CD44v6 expression did not show any statistical correlation. Conclusions: CD44s expression may play a role during lymphomatogenesis of non-GC type DLBCL. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document