scholarly journals Study on Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and HER-2/ neu Expression Pattern by Immunohistochemistry in 87 cases of Invasive Breast Cancer

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 436-443
Author(s):  
Md Shahadat Hossain ◽  
Ferdousy Begum ◽  
Ashim Ranjan Barua

Background: Now a day's determination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER-2/neu expression pattern by immunohistochemistry in invasive breast cancer have become the standard procedure for breast cancer management.Objective: To see the expression pattern of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER-2/neu in Bangladeshi women with invasive breast carcinoma.Method: This cross sectional study was performed in 87 cases of invasive breast cancer. Estrogen receptor (ER), Progesterone receptor (PR) and HER-2/neu expression pattern were assessed by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies for detecting estrogen and progesterone receptors, and polyclonal antibody for detecting HER-2/neu.Results: All the cases were graded according to Bloom-Richardson grading system. Of those, Grade I tumour was 18 (20.69%), Grade II tumour was 58 (66.67%) and Grade III tumour was 11(12.64%). Both ER and PR positive reactivity were same and it was found 65 (74.71%) and HER-2/neu reactivity pattern were found negative in 59 (67.82%) cases and positive in 28 (32.18%) cases. A statistically significant correlation was found between the expression of ER and low grade tumour (p=0.011) and combined estrogen and progesterone receptor positive reactivity with low grade tumour (p=0.002).Conclusion: ER, PR and HER-2/neu expression do not correlated with each other, so it is recommended that each test should be independently determined by immunohistochemistry in all cases of invasive breast cancer. All equivocal cases of HER-2/neu (score 2+) should be analyzed by FISH technique to find out the percentage of real score.KYAMC Journal Vol. 5, No.-1, Jul 2014, Page 436-443

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (Suppl_6) ◽  
pp. S-1-S-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Craig Allred ◽  
Robert W. Carlson ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Harold J. Burstein ◽  
Stephen B. Edge ◽  
...  

The NCCN Task Force on Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry was convened to critically evaluate the extent to which the presence of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) biomarkers in breast cancer serve as prognostic and predictive factors in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, and the ability of immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of ER and PgR to provide an accurate assessment of the expression of these biomarkers in breast cancer tumor tissue. The task force is a multidisciplinary panel of 13 experts in breast cancer who are affiliated with NCCN member institutions and represent the disciplines of pathology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, and biostatistics. The main overall conclusions of the task force are ER is a strong predictor of response to endocrine therapy; ER status of all samples of invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) should be evaluated by IHC; IHC measurements of PgR, although not as important clinically as ER, can provide useful information and should also be performed on all samples of invasive breast cancer or DCIS; IHC is the main testing strategy for evaluating ER and PgR in breast cancer and priority should be given to improve the quality of IHC testing methodologies; all laboratories performing IHC assays of ER and PgR should undertake formal validation studies to show both technical and clinical validation of the assay in use; and all laboratories performing IHC assays of hormone receptors in breast cancer should follow additional quality control and assurance measures as outlined in the upcoming guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 232470961989210
Author(s):  
Hardik S. Chhatrala ◽  
John Khuu ◽  
Lara Zuberi

Metachronous contralateral breast cancer (MCBC) is defined as contralateral breast cancer (BC) diagnosed more than 1 year after previous BC diagnosis. More BC survivors are at risk of MCBC given improved life expectancy with the availability of advanced cancer care. Estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative and HER-2-positive status of first BC are independent risk factors for the development of MCBC. We present a rare case of triple positive (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2 positive) MCBC patient who eventually developed brain metastasis within 15 months despite a near complete pathologic response of primary tumor. This case highlights that even in this era of antiestrogen and anti-HER-2 therapies, triple positive MCBC can have an aggressive clinical course, especially with brain metastasis as the first sign of metastasis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunkyung Ko ◽  
Seong-Eun Park ◽  
Eun Yoon Cho ◽  
Yujin Kim ◽  
Jung-Ah Hwang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongjuan Zheng ◽  
Chenyang Ge ◽  
Haiping Lin ◽  
Lunpo Wu ◽  
Qinghua Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (sPR positive) phenotype is an infrequent and independent biological entity. However, the prognosis of patients with sPR positive and her-2 negative phenotype is still controversial, and it is not always easy to decide treatment strategies for them.Methods: Patients during 2010–2014 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS). The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance differences of characteristics in groups. The Life-Table method was used to calculate 5-year CSS rates and the annual hazard rate of death (HRD). Results: A total of 97,527 patients were included, and only 745 (0.76%) patients were sPR positive phenotype. The majority of sPR positive breast cancer were basal-like subtype. Survival analysis showed that the sPR positive breast cancer had similar prognosis comparing to ER-negative/PR-negative (dHR negative) breast cancer, and had the highest HRD during the initial 1-2 years of follow-up, then maintained the HRD of almost zero during the late years of follow-up. Conclusions: The patients with sPR positive and her-2 negative breast cancer, similar to dHR negative breast cancer, had a worse survival, and could benefit from chemotherapy significantly. However, the escalating endocrine therapy was not recommended for sPR positive patients. The patients with sPR positive should be excluded from future clinical trials concerning endocrine therapy.


The Breast ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masako Kasami ◽  
Takayoshi Uematsu ◽  
Masatake Honda ◽  
Tsugumi Yabuzaki ◽  
Junichi Sanuki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document