Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia Patients with Corneal Opacity

Abstract Background: To analyse short-term changes in the anterior segment and retina after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Methods: Patients with myopia scheduled for SMILE were recruited from Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. Basic patient information such as age, sex, and refractive errors was recorded. Ocular measurements were taken before surgery, and 1 day and 1 week after surgery; they included axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), white to white (WTW), pupil diameter (PD), macular thickness (MT), ganglion cell layer thickness (GCL), retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL), choroidal thickness (CT), macular vessel density, and optic disc vessel density.Results: Sixty-one eyes of 31 patients were selected for this study. AL, CCT, ACD, and postoperative PD were significantly reduced (p<0.05), while LT was thickened after surgery (p<0.05). MT at the fovea decreased 1 day and 1 week after surgery (p<0.05). GCL showed no significant changes after surgery. RNFL was unchanged 1 day after surgery, but the inferior sector was thickened 1 week after surgery. CT was thicker at the fovea 1 day after surgery and 1.0 mm from the fovea in the nasal sector 1 week after surgery. Macular vessel density was significantly decreased 1 day after surgery and most recovered in 1 week. Optic disc vessel density decreased at the peripapillary part 1 day after surgery and recovered after 1 week. 𝜟ACD and 𝜟LT showed no significant correlation 1 day after surgery. 𝜟ACD was negatively correlated with 𝜟LT and sphere 1 week after surgery (r=-0.847, p<0.000; r=-0.398, p=0.002). 𝜟LT was positively correlated with the sphere 1 week after surgery (r=0.256, p=0.048).Conclusion: The anterior segment was the most affected, while the retina also underwent changes with regard to MT, RNFL, CT, macular vessel density, and peripapillary vessel density.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia: a Meta-analysis.

10.21203/rs.2.23101/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yanyan Fu ◽

Yewei Yin ◽

Yang Zhao ◽

Aiqun Xiang ◽

Ying Lu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Femtosecond Laser ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

High Myopia ◽

Spherical Aberration ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽

Small Incision ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Lenticule Extraction

Abstract Background To compare postoperative clinical outcomes of high myopia after being treated by Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).Methods Comprehensive studies were conducted on the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases.Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by 2 independent authors, and the RevMan 5.3 version software were used in analyzing.Result Ten studies involving 637 patients (1093 eyes;575 eyes in the SMILE group and 518 eyes in the FS-LASIK group) were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled result revealed no significant differences in the following outcomes: the logMAR values of postoperative UDVA(WMD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02,0.00, I²=0%, P = 0.10 at postoperative 1mo; WMD =-0.01, 95% CI: -0.00 to 0.01, I²=0%,P = 0.35 at postoperative 3mo; WMD = -0.01, 95% CI:-0.02 to 0.01, I²=17%,P = 0.26 at long term), the logMAR values of postoperative CDVA(WMD = -0.02, 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.00, I²=0%, P = 0.11),and the postoperative mean refractive SE (WMD =0.02, 95% CI:0.04 to 0.08, I²=29%, P=0.60) . In the long-term observation, postoperative tHOA (WMD =-0.10, 95% CI:-0.13 to -0.07, I²=15%, P<0.00001)and postoperative spherical aberration (WMD =-0.13, 95% CI:--0.17 to -0.09, I²=38%, P<0.00001) were found to be less in the SMILE group compared with the FS-LASIK group, but no significant difference was found in postoperative coma (WMD =-0.02, 95% CI:-0.04 to 0.00, I²=98%, P=0.40).We also found greater PCE change post FS-LASIK than SMILE at long term follow-ups(WMD =-0.69, 95% CI:-1.36 to -0.01, I²=0%, P<0.05, however, there was no significant difference between the two groups at 3- or 6- months.(WMD =-0.19, 95% CI:-0.41 to 0.03, I²=31%, P=0.09;WMD =-0.20, 95% CI:-0.50 to 0.10, I²=17%, P=0.20)Conclusion For patients with high myopia, both SMILE and FS-LASIK are safe and efficacious. However, SMILE induced less tHOA and spherical aberration compared with FS-LASIK. Besides, FS-LASIK showed a greater increase in PCE than SMILE only at long term follow-ups. It remains to be seen whether the patients can get a better visual quality after SMILE and more comparative studies focused on high myopia is necessary.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes of immediate transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy after suction loss during small-incision lenticule extraction

Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery ◽

10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000123 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 46 (5) ◽

pp. 756-761 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Byunghoon Chung ◽

David Sung Yong Kang ◽

Joon Hyun Kim ◽

Samuel Arba-Mosquera ◽

Seung Ki Jean ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Photorefractive Keratectomy ◽

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽

Small Incision ◽

Lenticule Extraction

Download Full-text

Two-year outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy combined with small-incision lenticule extraction for high astigmatism

10.21203/rs.3.rs-44166/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Bu Ki Kim ◽

Young Taek Chung

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Spherical Equivalent ◽

Full Thickness ◽

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽

Small Incision ◽

Astigmatic Keratotomy ◽

Induced Astigmatism ◽

Lenticule Extraction ◽

Surgically Induced

Abstract Background: To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism.Methods: This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method.Results: Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from -6.56 ± 2.38 D to -0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to -0.02 ± 0.09 and from -0.03 ± 0.07 D to -0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was -5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to -2.27 ± 0.97 D and -0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p <0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusion: Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.

Download Full-text

Clinical outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for high myopia: A meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0242059 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (2) ◽

pp. e0242059

Author(s):

Yanyan Fu ◽

Yewei Yin ◽

Xiaoying Wu ◽

Yuanjun Li ◽

Aiqun Xiang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Visual Acuity ◽

Femtosecond Laser ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

High Myopia ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction ◽

Distance Visual Acuity ◽

Small Incision ◽

Lenticule Extraction

Aim To compare postoperative clinical outcomes of high myopia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Methods From March 2018 to July 2020, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and several Chinese databases were comprehensively searched. The studies meeting the criteria were selected and included; the data were extracted by 2 independent authors. The clinical outcome parameters were analyzed with RevMan 5.3. Results This meta-analysis included twelve studies involving 766 patients (1400 eyes: 748 receiving SMILE and 652 receiving FS-LASIK). Pooled results revealed no significant differences in the following outcomes: the logarithm of the mean angle of resolution (logMAR) of postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.02 to 0.00, I2 = 0%, P = 0.07 at 1 mo; WMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.01, I2 = 0%, P = 0.83 at 3 mo; WMD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.00, I2 = 32%, P = 0.33 in the long term), and the postoperative mean refractive spherical equivalent (WMD = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.03, I2 = 13%, P = 0.30). However, the SMILE group had significantly better postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) than the FS-LASIK group (WMD = -0.04, 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.02, I2 = 0%, P<0.00001). In the long term, postoperative total higher-order aberration (WMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.10 to -0.07, I2 = 7%, P<0.00001) and postoperative spherical aberration (WMD = -0.15, 95% CI: -0.19 to -0.11, I2 = 29%, P<0.00001) were lower in the SMILE group than in the FS-LASIK group; a significant difference was also found in postoperative coma (WMD = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.06 to -0.03, I2 = 30%, P<0.00001). Conclusion For patients with high myopia, both SMILE and FS-LASIK are safe, efficacious and predictable. However, the SMILE group demonstrated advantages over the FS-LASIK group in terms of postoperative CDVA, while SMILE induced less aberration than FS-LASIK. It remains to be seen whether SMILE can provide better visual quality than FS-LASIK; further comparative studies focused on high myopia are necessary.

Download Full-text