scholarly journals Uma proposta de cadeia de valor da educação pública básica brasileira

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e538101119209
Author(s):  
Bruno Francisco Batista Dias ◽  
Deborah Moraes Zouain
Keyword(s):  

Este artigo apresenta uma proposta de cadeia de valor para a educação pública básica brasileira. Para tanto, nos valemos da proposta de análise da geração de valor de Michael Porter, de modo a identificar as atividades primárias e secundárias dessa cadeia. O procedimento metodológico adotado foi a revisão bibliográfica, em que se fez uma minuciosa leitura das publicações relevantes relativas ao tema a fim de captar as nuances dos processos realizados no âmbito da prestação de serviços educacionais públicos capazes de gerar valor. O resultado da investigação nos permitiu propor uma cadeia formada por duas atividades secundárias (A.S) e duas atividades primárias (A.P): (A.S.1) Regulamentação e Planejamento; (A.S.2) Avaliação e Acompanhamento; (A.P.1) Gestão Escolar; (A.P. 2) Práticas Pedagógicas.

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive Edwards

The objective of this paper is to analyse key elements of the development strategy of Singapore since the mid–1960s. The paper describes the economic challenge faced by Singapore in the mid–1960s, overviews contemporary world trends in foreign direct investment, and uses competitiveness constructs developed by Michael Porter (1985) to clarify key stages in the evolution of Singapore's development strategy. The paper argues that the strategy has been successful because of unremitting top priority given to it by Singapore's political leadership and because the political leaders charged a single organisation, the Economic Development Board (EDB), with absolute authority to develop and implement the strategy. The paper concludes with implications for Queensland's Smart State initiatives.


2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Bathelt ◽  
Ulrich Dewald

Relational aspects of regional economic support and cluster policy. The recent debate about the application and interpretation of cluster concepts is characterized by increasing skepticism. The literature has particularly criticized the fact that policy formulation is often only vaguely related to the academic discussion and evidence regarding clusters. Part of this confusion can be traced back to the fuzziness of the original cluster concept developed by Michael Porter which claims to be applicable to the competitiveness of both national industry bundles and inter-linked regional industry networks. As a consequence, policies which are declared as cluster policies can be quite heterogeneous. In this paper, we argue for a closer link between cluster conception and cluster policy. It is shown that an understanding of clusters as multidimensional industry configurations is advantageous in developing and advancing a relational cluster policy. A multidimensional cluster approach, which highlights the role of agency in economic interaction, focuses on the action space of cluster agents, and goes beyond the regional and national scale. It avoids simplifications and deterministic interpretations that can result from using aggregated data or from treating regions as if they were agents. Instead, the approach recognizes that external relations of cluster actors are core in understanding and explaining the success of clusters. We will emphasize this by laying out elements of a relational cluster policy.


2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (20) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Franco Ribeiro ◽  
Daniel Carvalho de Rezende ◽  
Gustavo Carvalho de Rezende
Keyword(s):  

Buscou-se a combinação de duas correntes teóricas não conflitantes (evolucionistas e neo- institucionalistas) com as contribuições de Michael Porter, na busca de novos elementos que auxiliem na compreensão das estratégias das firmas. Nesse sentido, aprofundou-se a discussão acerca do conceito de coerência, que emerge como um dos mais importantes na compreensão do processo histórico de formação de competências tecnológicas, o que restringe as estratégias de diversificação e ajuda na definição das fronteiras das firmas e nas estratégias de arranjos e parcerias inter-firmas na busca da vantagem competitiva, ressaltando-se a importância da inovação como elemento vital nessa busca.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32
Author(s):  
Fredy René Meza ◽  
Wilson Fernando Salgado Cifuentes ◽  
Juan Carlos Leal Céspedes
Keyword(s):  

La competitividad de los países para poder acceder con mayor facilidad a los mercados globales, requieren como establece Michael Porter, la transformación de las ventajas comparativas en ventajas competitivas, las cuales se agrupan en aspectos como el desarrollo de tecnología, la generación de conocimiento, y el manejo de la información. Sumado a lo anterior, el esfuerzo que debe realizar el Estado como actor de inversión y que puede crear un entorno sustentable para el desarrollo con el apoyo del mismo sector privado y la academia, como lo define la teoría de la competitividad sistémica. La Unión Europea presenta un escenario atractivo para los productos del Departamento, pero debe tener en cuenta aspectos culturales de consumo, idiomáticos, de normas de entrada y distribución logística que permita ser competitivo en este mercado. También es importante tener en cuenta la economía europea atraviesa por una situación difícil catalogada de recesión, lo que establece un escenario de mayor riesgo para el comercio. El departamento del Meta, es un territorio con bastante riqueza, expresada en productos agropecuarios, mineros, fauna e hídricos, pero presenta indicadores bajos de competitividad y que a nivel nacional se encuentra en la posición 13 entre 29. Las debilidades principales están en infraestructura, ciencia y tecnología, talento humano y la fortaleza económica.


Encuentro ◽  
2004 ◽  
pp. 80-101
Author(s):  
René Mendoza Klaus Kuhnekath

El concepto cluster (aglomerado, conglomerado, núcleo o enjambre) es la palabra más popular de nuestros días en toda América Latina. Lo es también Michael Porter, el economista de la Universidad de Harvardl que ganó renombre en la administración de Reagan, en los Estados Unidos, cuando fue llamado a integrar la comisión del Presidente sobre Competitividad Industrial de los Estados Unidos (Porter, 1990: xii). ¿Cómo es que ese concepto ha adquirido tal notoriedad?


2020 ◽  
pp. 106-118
Author(s):  
Joseph Soeters
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Aster Mekonnen ◽  
Liz Larner

While the luxury goods market has been slow to embrace and capitalise on the opportunities related to the digital era that has not been the case for their customers. Fashion luxury brands are no exception to this and some have been noted for their inability to keep up with the digital revolution. In the case of fashion luxury brands, whilst some argue that the offline-online integration has added value to the brands others suggest that it has eroded the panache associated with luxury brand. As luxury fashion brands play a significant role in shaping the fashion industry one cannot ignore the approach to digital integration and the impact it may have on the direction the fashion industry takes. As noted by Michael Porter (2001) whether one should integrate internet technology as part of their business plan is no longer questionable, but rather a matter of how it may be most effectively deployed. Based on case studies this chapter investigates how successful integration of the offline with the online environment can be achieved for such a dynamic industry.


Author(s):  
Bhekuzulu Khumalo

The digitization of information has been one of the greatest stories of the last two decades. This paper seeks to explain the meaning of this process and how it affects already established models concerning trade and knowledge economics. This paper is based on the simple premise that knowledge is the most important resource, without which nothing can be done. The paper starts by looking at the competitive advantage theory that was largely promoted by Michael Porter whose works have greatly influenced the first part of this paper. The paper then discusses the ever more important role of knowledge due to competitive advantage theory and the digitalization of information. Finally the implications and discrediting the comparative advantage theory, this theory has no place in modern economic thinking. As we have more tools in our disposal, we must investigate the importance of wave theory as well as the true meaning of competition. It also looks into the greater role collaboration will play in the future. The paper briefly discusses the effects that the digitization of information will have over time.


Author(s):  
Rex Ahdar

The Commerce Act 1986 expressly states its object is to promote “effective or workable competition.” This traditional Harvard School approach has been consistently assailed by big business interests in New Zealand, assisted by a phalanx of “down-under” Chicago School economists and lawyers. Chicagoans have had minor successes in terms of amendments to the principal Act, and some quite notable court victories, but the glittering prize, the overall objective of the Act, has remained unchanged. Chicago won several battles, but lost the war. A major amendment to the Act in 2001, promoted by a Labour government, recast its object to state that its purpose was “to promote competition in markets for the long-term benefit of consumers within New Zealand.” After a quiet period where nothing seemed to have changed, the most recent signs are that a mild preference for consumers is appearing. The chapter also examines the international competitiveness arguments of Michael Porter.


1997 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Manoel Teixeira Carneiro ◽  
Maria Alice Ferreira Deschamps Cavalcanti ◽  
Jorge Ferreira da Silva

As estratégias genéricas de liderança em custo, diferenciação e enfoque desenvolvidas por Michael Porter (1980) vêm merecendo destacada aceitabilidade, tanto no meio acadêmico quanto no empresarial. Este artigo discute as opiniões de diversos autores de renome, os quais têm apresentado críticas, complementos e refinamentos a esta tipologia básica. Destaque especial é concedido a Chrisman, Hofer e Boulton (1988) e Miller e Dess (1993), por suas extensões à tipologia de Porter (1980), e a Mintzberg (1988), por seu trabalho de detalhamento da estratégia de diferenciação. Como contraponto à análise externa (baseada na estrutura da indústria) que orienta a tipologia de Porter (1980), são apresentados os conceitos da Resource-Based View, uma teoria de estratégias baseada nos recursos e competências da empresa (análise interna), ainda em desenvolvimento, mas que vem ganhando gradual aceitação no meio acadêmico. Por fim, a evolução do pensamento de Porter - de 1980 à 1996 - é analisada, de forma a evidenciar como o próprio autor vem detalhando e redefinindo o foco de seu objeto de estudo - da análise da estrutura da indústria até o sistema de atividades da empresa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document