scholarly journals Underwater hearing and communication in the endangered Hawaiian monk seal Neomonachus schauinslandi

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Sills ◽  
K Parnell ◽  
B Ruscher ◽  
C Lew ◽  
TL Kendall ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 1185-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. G. Gilmartin ◽  
L. L. Eberhardt

Restoration of the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi) population to its former abundance poses a number of problems in managing a complex system. Sharp differences in history and current trend exist among the six major pupping sites. A severely unbalanced adult sex ratio has resulted in deaths from "mobbing" of estrus females at two sites. Some unknown factor apparently severely reduced the numbers of females at three of the sites and thus produced the observed excess of males. Sex ratios subsequently decreased, but losses of adult females continue at two sites. A simple model indicates that sex ratios at the two sites where mobbing is a problem would require more than 10 years to approach an equilibrium value. Data on trends from counts are compared with estimates from reproduction and survival rates and agree closely except at one site (Kure Atoll), where introductions of young females have been made.


1981 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. ERIC LOMBARD ◽  
RICHARD R. FAY ◽  
YEHUDAH L. WERNER

Comparable auditory sound pressure level (SPL) and sound intensity level(SIL) threshold curves were determined in air and under water in Ranacatesbeiana. Threshold curves were determined using chronic metal electrodeimplants which detected multi-unit responses of the torus semicircularis toincident sound. In terms of SPL, hearing thresholds in water and air aresimilar below 0.2 kHz. Above 0.2 kHz, the sensitivity under water falls of fat about 16 dB/octave to reach an average loss of about 30 dB above 0.4 kHz. In terms of SIL, the organism is about 30 dB more sensitive under water than in air below 0.2 kHz and equally sensitive in air and water above 0.4 kHz.The relative merits of the two measures are discussed and an attempt is made to relate the results to morphology of the middle and inner ears. This report is the first to compare aerial and underwater hearing abilities in any organism using electrode implants.


2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Schultz ◽  
J. D. Baker ◽  
R. J. Toonen ◽  
B. W. Bowen

2004 ◽  
Vol 322 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maia K Willcox ◽  
Lee Ann Woodward ◽  
Gina M Ylitalo ◽  
Jon Buzitis ◽  
Shannon Atkinson ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 203-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Aldridge ◽  
Lizabeth Bowen ◽  
Brett R. Smith ◽  
George A. Antonelis ◽  
Frances Gulland ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document