scholarly journals Real-world treatment outcomes in metastatic lung cancer

10.33540/487 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Christina Maaike van der Welle
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6567-6567
Author(s):  
Catherine Labbe ◽  
Erin L. Stewart ◽  
Catherine Brown ◽  
Andrea Perez Cosio ◽  
Ashlee Vennettilli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Atul Batra ◽  
Shiying Kong ◽  
Rodrigo Rigo ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung

93 Background: Due to highly selective enrollment in clinical trials, the generalizability of results may be limited. This study aimed to identify the proportion of real-world patients with metastatic lung cancer (MLC) eligible to participate in a clinical trial. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with MLC in a large Canadian province from 2004 to 2017. Ineligibility to participate in a clinical trial was defined by common exclusion criteria: age > 75 years, anemia, comorbid conditions (heart disease, uncontrolled diabetes, kidney disease, or liver disease) and history of a prior malignancy or immunosuppression. Logistic regression models were used to describe the likelihood of receiving systemic therapy and Cox regression models were constructed to determine the association of trial ineligibility with overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 13,996 patients were included; the median age was 70 years and 46.9% were women. Of these, 8,615 (61.6%) were trial-ineligible. The common reasons for ineligibility were age > 75 years (11.5%), abnormal renal function (8.3%) and prior immunosuppression (3.2%). Further, 32.3% of patients were ineligible by multiple exclusion criteria. In the real-world, 40.6% and 21.8% of trial-eligible and ineligible patients received systemic therapy (P < .001), respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, trial-ineligible patients had lower odds of receiving systemic therapy (odds ratio, .84; 95% confidence interval [CI], .76-.92; P < .001). At a median follow-up of 66.2 months, the median OS of trial-eligible patients was 5.1 months as compared to 2.9 months in those deemed ineligible (P < .001). Receipt of systemic therapy was associated with longer OS in both trial-eligible (10.5 vs 2.7 months, P < .001) and ineligible (9.3 vs 2.1 months, P < .001) patients. In a Cox regression model that adjusted for age, sex and systemic therapy, ineligibility was predictive of worse OS. Conclusions: More than half of patients with MLC are ineligible to participate in clinical trials. Real-world use of systemic therapy was generally low, but its use was associated with improvement in OS even among individuals considered trial-ineligible. Clinical trials should broaden their eligibility criteria to better represent the phenotype of real-world patients so that findings are more generalizable. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-395.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Labbé ◽  
Yvonne Leung ◽  
João Gabriel Silva Lemes ◽  
Erin Stewart ◽  
Catherine Brown ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
M. Kaous ◽  
D.D. Balachandran ◽  
G. Pacheco ◽  
S.A. Mahoney ◽  
J.N.T. Po ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 0272989X2199895
Author(s):  
Adinda Mieras ◽  
Annemarie Becker-Commissaris ◽  
Hanna T. Klop ◽  
H. Roeline W. Pasman ◽  
Denise de Jong ◽  
...  

Background Previous studies have investigated patients’ treatment goals before starting a treatment for metastatic lung cancer. Data on the evaluation of treatment goals are lacking. Aim To determine if patients with metastatic lung cancer and their oncologists perceive the treatment goals they defined at the start of systemic treatment as achieved after treatment and if in hindsight they believe it was the right decision to start systemic therapy. Design and Participants A prospective multicenter study in 6 hospitals across the Netherlands between 2016 and 2018. Following systemic treatment, 146 patients with metastatic lung cancer and 23 oncologists completed a questionnaire on the achievement of their treatment goals and whether they made the right treatment decision. Additional interviews with 15 patients and 5 oncologists were conducted. Results According to patients and oncologists, treatment goals were achieved in 30% and 37% for ‘quality of life,’ 49% and 41% for ‘life prolongation,’ 26% and 44% for ‘decrease in tumor size,’ and 44% for ‘cure’, respectively. Most patients and oncologists, in hindsight, felt they had made the right decision to start treatment and also if they had not achieved their goals (72% and 93%). This was related to the feeling that they had to do ‘something.’ Conclusions Before deciding on treatment, the treatment options, including their benefits and side effects, and the goals patients have should be discussed. It is key that these discussions include not only systemic treatment but also palliative care as effective options for doing ‘something.’


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document