scholarly journals PENINGKATAN DISIPLIN GURU MELALUI PENERAPAN BUDAYA SEKOLAH DENGAN MEMBERIKAN REWARD AND PUNISHMENT DI SMA NEGERI 1 KOTA TANGERANG

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Hikmat .
Keyword(s):  
Reward And Punishment

Penelitian tindakan sekolah ini dilakukan tindakan berupa penerapan budaya sekolah dengan memberikan Reward and Punishment untuk para guru di SMA Negeri 1 Kota Tangerang. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dalam dua siklus, karena dari hasil penelitian dan analisa data, ternyata pada siklus kedua, kedisiplinan guru dalam kehadiran dikelas pada proses belajar mengajar meningkat dan memenuhi indikator yang telah ditetapkan sebesar 75%. Data yang diperoleh menunjukan bahwa setelah diadakan penerapan tindakan pada siklus I, guru yang terlambat lebih dari 15 menit adalah 18 orang atau 41,86%, guru yang terlambat 10 menit s.d 15 menit adalah 15 orang atau 34,88%, serta guru yang terlambat kurang dari 10 menit sebanyak 10 orang guru atau 23,26 %. Dan pada siklus II guru yang terlambat lebih dari 15 menit adalah 0, dan guru yang terlambat 10 menit s.d 15 menit adalah 7 orang atau 16,28%, terlambat kurang dari 10 menit sebanyak 36 orang guru atau 83,72%. Dari hasil penelitian ini, dapat disimpulkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan disiplin guru dalam kehadiran dikelas pada kegiatan belajar mengajar dapat dilakukan melalui penerapan budaya sekolah dengan memberikan Reward and Punishment kepada guru.

A Little beyond Reward and Punishment

1973 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 489-490
Author(s):  
STANLEY C. RATNER
Keyword(s):  
Reward And Punishment

UPAYA MENINGKATKAN BUDAYA KERJA TENAGA PENDIDIKAN DAN TENAGA PENDIDIKAN MELALUI PENERAPAN REWARD AND PUNISHMENT DI SMP NEGERI 8 GORONTALO

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Hasyin Gani
Keyword(s):  
Reward And Punishment

Abstrak Sekolah atau lembaga pendidikanmerupakan sebuah wahana pengemban peserta didik. Aktivitas di dalamnya terkait proses pelayanan jasa oleh guru sebagai fasilitator, dan kepala sekolah sebagai manajer atau pengelola sekolah.Pengelolaan sekolah dan peran penting kepala sekolah, pada dasarnya mencakup ruang lingkup yang luas, salah satu di antaranya adalah meningkatkan budaya kerja para guru dan pegawai yang dipimpinnya. Hal tersebut dapat dicapai dengan menerapkan metode reward and punishment, yaitu memberikan pujian kepada karyawan yang bekerja dengan baik, danteguran kepada pegawai yang melanggar aturan yang telah ditetapkan bersama. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mencari alternatif pemecahan masalah sebagai upaya peningkatan budaya kerja para guru dan pegawai melalui penerapan reward and punishment di SMP Negeri 8 Gorontalo.

KONSEP REWARD DAN PUNISHMENT MENURUT IRAWATI ISTADI (KAJIAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF PENDIDIKAN ISLAM)

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-64
Author(s):  
Umi Baroroh
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
Analysis Methods ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Research Theme ◽  
Reward And Punishment

Abstract: This research was conducted to find out how reward and punishment according to Irawati certainly does not conflict with the value of Islamic education. This is a library research the data of which were taken from several works of Irawati Istadi and direct interviews with her. The researcher also took some data from several researchers who discussed Irawati Istadi's thoughts and from Islamic education figures whose thoughts had relevance to the research theme. Content analysis methods is applied to draw conclusions. From this research, it can be concluded that the concept of reward and punishment according to Irawati Istadi turns out to be compatible with the Islamic education. However, in Irawati's thought, there are also some differences shows the development of thoughts from previous figures of Islamic education and certainly did not conflict with the values of Islamic education. Keywords: reward, punishment, Islamic education, Irawati Istadi, educator.

High dietary restraint improves performance on a food-motivated probabilistic selection task

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R Sadler ◽  
Grace Elisabeth Shearrer ◽  
Nichollette Acosta ◽  
Kyle Stanley Burger
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Instrumental Conditioning ◽  
Food Reinforcement ◽  
Dietary Restraint ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Brain Response ◽  
Anthropometric Measures ◽  
Instrumental Task ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Reward And Punishment

BACKGROUND: Dietary restraint represents an individual’s intent to limit their food intake and has been associated with impaired passive food reinforcement learning. However, the impact of dietary restraint on an active, response dependent learning is poorly understood. In this study, we tested the relationship between dietary restraint and food reinforcement learning using an active, instrumental conditioning task. METHODS: A sample of ninety adults completed a response-dependent instrumental conditioning task with reward and punishment using sweet and bitter tastes. Brain response via functional MRI was measured during the task. Participants also completed anthropometric measures, reward/motivation related questionnaires, and a working memory task. Dietary restraint was assessed via the Dutch Restrained Eating Scale. RESULTS: Two groups were selected from the sample: high restraint (n=29, score >2.5) and low restraint (n=30; score <1.85). High restraint was associated with significantly higher BMI (p=0.003) and lower N-back accuracy (p=0.045). The high restraint group also was marginally better at the instrumental conditioning task (p=0.066, r=0.37). High restraint was also associated with significantly greater brain response in the intracalcarine cortex (MNI: 15, -69, 12; k=35, pfwe< 0.05) to bitter taste, compared to neutral taste.CONCLUSIONS: High restraint was associated with improved performance on an instrumental task testing how individuals learn from reward and punishment. This may be mediated by greater brain response in the primary visual cortex, which has been associated with mental representation. Results suggest that dietary restraint does not impair response-dependent reinforcement learning.

Imaging the “social brain” in schizophrenia: A systematic review of neuroimaging studies of social reward and punishment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Mow ◽  
Arti Gandhi ◽  
Daniel Fulford
Keyword(s):  
Brain Activity ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Social Motivation ◽  
Social Impairment ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Social Reward ◽  
Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders ◽  
Social Stimuli ◽  
Schizophrenia Spectrum ◽  
Reward And Punishment

Decreased social functioning and high levels of loneliness and social isolation are common in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), contributing to reduced quality of life. One key contributor to social impairment is low social motivation, which may stem from aberrant neural processing of socially rewarding or punishing stimuli. To summarize research on the neurobiology of social motivation in SSD, we performed a systematic literature review of neuroimaging studies involving the presentation of social stimuli intended to elicit feelings of reward and/or punishment. Across 11 studies meeting criteria, people with SSD demonstrated weaker modulation of brain activity in regions within a proposed social interaction network, including prefrontal, cingulate, and striatal regions, as well as the amygdala and insula. Firm conclusions regarding neural differences in SSD in these regions, as well as connections within networks, are limited due to conceptual and methodological inconsistencies across the available studies. We conclude by making recommendations for the study of social reward and punishment processing in SSD in future research.

scholarly journals Reward and Punishment Sensitivity are Associated with Cross-disorder Traits

2021 ◽  
Vol 298 ◽  
pp. 113795
Author(s):  
Christel M. Portengen ◽  
Emma Sprooten ◽  
Marcel P. Zwiers ◽  
Pieter J. Hoekstra ◽  
Andrea Dietrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Punishment Sensitivity ◽  
Reward And Punishment

scholarly journals How Narcissism Shapes Responses to Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior: Hypo-Responsiveness or Hyper-Responsiveness?

2021 ◽  
pp. 014616722110072
Author(s):  
Jiafang Chen ◽  
Barbara Nevicka ◽  
Astrid C. Homan ◽  
Gerben A. van Kleef
Keyword(s):  
Social Behavior ◽  
Prosocial Behavior ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Social Order ◽  
Social Behaviors ◽  
Moral Character ◽  
Prosocial Behaviors ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Reward And Punishment

Narcissists have a relatively higher proclivity for displaying antisocial rather than prosocial behaviors, suggesting a comparatively higher tendency for unfavorably impacting societies. However, maintenance of social order also depends on appropriate responses to others’ social behavior. Once we focus on narcissists as observers rather than actors, their impact on social functioning becomes less clear-cut. Theoretical arguments suggest that narcissists could be either hypo-responsive or hyper-responsive to others’ social behavior. Across four studies, we examined narcissists’ responsiveness to variations in others’ antisocial and prosocial behaviors. Results showed that narcissists differentiated less between others’ antisociality/prosociality, as reflected in their subsequent moral character evaluations (Studies 1–4) and reward and punishment (Studies 3 and 4). These results suggest that narcissists are hypo-responsive to others’ social behaviors. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document