3. Seeking local indicators: Participatory stakeholder evaluation of farmer-to-farmer projects, Mexico

2000 ◽  
pp. 32-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jutta Blauert ◽  
Eduardo Quintanar
2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marios Skiadas ◽  
Basil Agroyiannis ◽  
Ewart Carson ◽  
Derek Cramp ◽  
Costas Fourtounas ◽  
...  

A telemedicine system for home haemodialysis was designed using a systems approach and a feedback model to produce the hardware and software specifications. Preliminary clinical trials at four European locations involved 29 patients and 305 sessions of haemodialysis. The evaluation included an evaluability assessment and formative evaluation. Central to the methodology was the detailed specification of a stakeholder/evaluation criterion matrix. Preliminary results indicated that the telemedicine system was capable of satisfying the requirements of formative evaluation as a precursor to evaluating its overall worth.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Paracchini ◽  
Cesare Pacini ◽  
M. Laurence M. Jones ◽  
Marta Pérez-Soba

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 588-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anubama Ramachandra ◽  
Nur Naha Abu Mansor

Purpose – The current gap in the field of community engagement is evaluation and measurement of the impacts on the stakeholders, mainly the community being engaged with. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – This paper discusses the need to consider the stakeholder's perspective and their involvement in a community engagement initiative, or in any social program. The authors begin by debating the most common evaluation techniques used, followed by re-introducing stakeholder evaluation to the field of community engagement. Findings – The evaluation using the stakeholders’ approach will not only create a holistic evaluation process, but will also assist in fostering a sense of ownership of the community engagement program. Originality/value – Community engagement is given much importance nowadays in Malaysia, especially in line with institutes of higher learning's tripartite mission, the third mission being the ability to engage with communities. It is not surprising because community engagement offers enormous benefits for regional and societal development. Community engagement relies heavily on partnership and mutual reciprocity between different stakeholders such as communities, universities, non-government organizations, field experts and funding organizations. In order to sustain the engagement initiatives, it is important to know who are the “owners” or stakeholders of the program.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Lagisetty ◽  
Laura Flamm ◽  
Summer Rak ◽  
Jessica Landgraf ◽  
Michele Heisler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document