A case report of oral allergy syndrome involved anaphylactic shock caused by macadamia nut

Author(s):  
Nobuharu Yamada ◽  
Kaori Mizukawa

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-91
Author(s):  
G. Zariquiey-Esteva ◽  
P. Santa-Candela


2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiming Shi ◽  
Haifeng Su ◽  
Jie Shen ◽  
Cheng Zhu ◽  
Zhengkun Huang


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Kumar Tripathy ◽  
Bishnu Kumar

A case of fatal reaction due to injection of 5 ml of Lariago, intramuscularly (an IPCA pharmaceutical company product containing chloroquine phosphate 40 mg/ml) is presented. Though there is ample documentary and material proof regarding the above and signs on postmortem examination of anaphylactic shock, the chemical examination failed to find it.





2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyuki Takahashi ◽  
Kunihisa Hotta ◽  
Soichiro Inoue ◽  
Tomonori Takazawa ◽  
Tatsuo Horiuchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anaphylactic shock during pregnancy is a rare but life-threatening event for both the mother and the newborn. Case presentation A 42-year-old woman, who was pregnant with twins, was scheduled for cesarean delivery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. An epidural catheter was placed uneventfully. After spinal anesthesia, the patient exhibited skin symptoms and severe hypotension. The patient was diagnosed with anaphylaxis, and subsequently, treatment was started. Fetal heart rate monitoring revealed sustained bradycardia, and it was decided to proceed with cesarean delivery. After delivery, the mother’s vital signs recovered. Both infants were intubated due to birth asphyxia. Currently, the twins are 4 years old and exhibit no developmental problems. Clinical examination identified mepivacaine as the causative agent of anaphylaxis. Conclusions This case report highlights that upon occurrence of anaphylaxis during pregnancy, maternal treatment and fetal assessment should be started immediately. Indication for immediate cesarean delivery should be considered and a definite identification of the causative factor pursued.



2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Di Chiara ◽  
Giulia V Stazi ◽  
Zaccaria Ricci ◽  
Angelo Polito ◽  
Stefano Morelli ◽  
...  


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Jae-Ha Yoo ◽  
Byung-Ho Choi ◽  
Sung-Han Sul


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
Ju Young Han ◽  
Oh Hyun Lee ◽  
Gyung Eun Kim ◽  
Seung Baik Han ◽  
So Hun Kim ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Ukleja-Sokołowska ◽  
Robert Zacniewski ◽  
Kinga Lis ◽  
Magdalena Żbikowska-Gotz ◽  
Andrzej Kuźmiński ◽  
...  

Abstract Background An allergy to kiwi is rare in Poland. Most (65–72%) of the patients who are allergic to kiwi report symptoms of an oral allergy syndrome (OAS); however, systemic manifestations (18–28%) have also been reported. Case report A 27-year-old male patient, previously not suffering from chronic diseases, exercised in the gym. He began with isometric training and then continued with aerobic exercise on a treadmill. After exercise, he ate 2 kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa) fruits. He experienced a swelling of the lips after eating the fruit, followed by an itchy scalp and a swollen face. Approximately 60 min later, the symptoms worsened: the patient suffered from generalized hives, general weakness and a "rumbling" sensation in ears. The patient's condition improved upon the consumption of antihistamines. However, the swelling of the face persisted for 24 h despite previously eating a kiwi without any side effects. By means of diagnostics based on allergen components, an allergy to grass allergen components, especially timothy grass—Phl p 1, Phl p 2 and Phl p 5, was confirmed. The presence of IgE that is specific for Act d 2 kiwi was also found. The patient had an oral food challenge with kiwi fruit at rest and after exercise provocation test. The challenge was negative at rest and positive after exercise. A food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis gathered with a kiwi sensitization was diagnosed. Conclusion To our knowledge, this case is the first report of a kiwi-allergic patient in whom exercise was a necessary cofactor to induce an anaphylactic reaction.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document