scholarly journals The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianhua Meng ◽  
Kai Chen ◽  
Chenchen Yang ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Xiaohong Wang
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Postoperative Pain Score

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been adopted in some maternity units and studied extensively in cesarean section (CS) in the last years, showing encouraging results in clinic practice. However, the present evidence assessing the effectiveness of ERAS for CS remains weak, and there is a paucity in the published literature, especially in improving maternal outcomes. Our study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for CS.Methods: A systematic literature search using Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library was carried out up to October 2020. The appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies applying ERAS for patients undergoing CS were included in this study, comparing the effect of ERAS protocols with conventional care on length of hospital stay (LOS), readmission rate, incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid use, and cost of hospitalization. All statistical analyses were conducted with the RevMan 5.3 software.Results: Ten studies (four RCTs and six observational studies) involving 16,391 patients were included. ERAS was associated with a decreased LOS (WMD −7.47 h, 95% CI: −8.36 to −6.59 h, p < 0.00001) and lower incidence of postoperative complications (RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.68, p < 0.00001). Moreover, pooled analysis showed that postoperative pain score (WMD: −1.23, 95% CI: −1.32 to −1.15, p < 0.00001), opioid use (SMD: −0.46, 95% CI: −0.58 to −0.34, p < 0.00001), and hospital cost (SMD:−0.54, 95% CI: −0.63 to −0.45, p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the conventional care group. No significant difference was observed with regard to readmission rate (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.54, p = 0.62).Conclusions: The available evidence suggested that ERAS applying to CS significantly reduced postoperative complications, lowered the postoperative pain score and opioid use, shortened the hospital stay, and potentially reduced hospital cost without compromising readmission rates. Therefore, protocols implementing ERAS in CS appear to be effective and safe. However, the results should be interpreted with caution owing to the limited number and methodological quality of included studies; hence, future large, well-designed, and better methodological quality studies are needed to enhance the body of evidence.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Cooperation Alleviates Postoperative Pain after Elective Craniotomies: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Neurosurgical Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Qu ◽  
Yuan Wang ◽  
Bolin Liu ◽  
Haitao Zhang ◽  
Zhengmin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Conventional Care ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Postoperative Pain Score ◽  
Eras Protocol

Abstract Objective: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of neurosurgical enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the management of postoperative pain after elective craniotomies. Methods: This randomised controlled trial was conducted in the neurosurgical center of Tangdu Hospital (Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China). A total of 129 patients undergoing craniotomies between October 2016 and July 2017 were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing ERAS protocol and conventional care. The primary outcome was the postoperative pain score assessed by a verbal numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: Patients in the ERAS group had a significant reduction in postoperative pain score on POD 1 compared to patients in the control group (mean NRS 3.12 vs. 4.44, OR 0.0968, 95% CI 0.3299 to 2.317, p = 0.010). More patients (n = 44, 68.8%) in the ERAS group experienced mild pain (NRS: 1 to 3) on POD1 compared with patients (n = 23, 35.4%) in the control group (p < 0.05). A significant reduction in pain score was observed on POD 2 and POD 3 in the ERAS group compared with that in the control group (POD2: mean NRS 2.85 vs. 4.32, OR 0.2628, 95% CI 0.5619 to 2.379, p=0.002. POD3: mean NRS 2.32 vs. 4.03, OR 0.1468, 95% CI 0.9537 to 2.458, p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, the median postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly decreased with the incorporation of ERAS protocol compared to the controls (ERAS: 4 days, control: 7 days, P<0.001). Conclusion: Implementation of the neurosurgical ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy patients have significant benefits in alleviating postoperative pain and enhancing recovery after surgery compared to the conventional care. Further evaluation of this protocol in larger, multi-center studies is warranted.

scholarly journals Sufentanil sublingual tablet system versus oral oxycodone for management of postoperative pain in enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Noel ◽  
Luca Miglionico ◽  
Mickael Leclercq ◽  
Harold Jennart ◽  
Jean-François Fils ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Sublingual Tablet ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Median Pain

Abstract Purpose Effectiveness of sufentanil sublingual tablet system (SSTS) compared to oral oxycodone in the management of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods This pragmatic, parallel, open label, randomized controlled, trial enrolled 72 adult patients scheduled for TKA under spinal anesthesia following ERAS pathway. In addition to multimodal analgesia, patients received SSTS 15 mcg (SSTS group) or oral oxycodone extended release 10 mg twice daily and oral oxycodone immediate-release 5 mg up to four times daily on demand (Oxy group) to control pain during 48 h postoperatively. The primary endpoint was pain measured using a numeric rating scale at 24 h postoperatively. Time to first mobilization, side effects and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Results Median pain score at 24 h at rest was 3 [2–4] for Oxy group vs 2 [1.75–3] for SSTS group (p = 0.272) whereas median pain score on movement was 4 [3–6] vs 3 [2–5] respectively (p = 0.059). No difference in time to first mobilization was found between the two groups. The method of pain control was judged good/excellent for 83.9% of patients in the SSTS group compared with 52.9% in the Oxy group (p = 0.007). The incidence of nausea was 33% in SSTS group and 9% in Oxy group (p = 0.181). Conclusions In complement to ERAS multimodal analgesia, sublingual sufentanil 15 mcg tablet system did not show clinically significant pain improvement compared to oral oxycodone after total knee arthroplasty. Trial registration Clinical Trials: NCT04448457; retrospectively registered on June 24, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448457?cond=sublingual+sufentanil&cntry=BE&draw=2&rank=3

Post-Cesarean Opioid Use after Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin A. MacGregor ◽  
Mark Neerhof ◽  
Mary J. Sperling ◽  
David Alspach ◽  
Beth A. Plunkett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Trial Of Labor ◽  
Cesarean Deliveries ◽  
Preoperative Diet ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
Postoperative Morphine

Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is associated with lower maternal opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD). Study Design We performed a pre- and postimplementation (PRE and POST, respectively) study of an ERAS protocol for cesarean deliveries. ERAS is a multimodal, multidisciplinary perioperative approach. The four pillars of our protocol include education, pain management, nutrition, and early ambulation. Patients were counseled by their outpatient providers and given an educational booklet. Pain management included gabapentin and acetaminophen immediately prior to spinal anesthesia. Postoperatively patients received scheduled acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Oxycodone was initiated as needed 24 hours after spinal analgesia. Preoperative diet consisted of clear carbohydrate drink consumed 2 hours prior to scheduled operative time with advancement as tolerated immediately postoperation. Women with a body mass index (BMI) <40 kg/m2 and scheduled CD were eligible for ERAS. PRE patients were randomly selected from repeat cesarean deliveries (RCDs) at a single site from October 2017 to September 2018, BMI <40 kg/m2, without trial of labor. The POST cohort included women who participated in ERAS from October 2018 to June 2019. PRE and POST demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Primary outcome was total postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and maximum postoperative day 2 (POD2) pain score. Results All women in PRE (n = 70) had RCD compared with 66.2% (49/74) in POST. Median total postoperative MMEs were 140.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 87.5–182.5) in PRE compared with 0.0 (IQR: 0.0–72.5) in POST (p < 0.001). Median LOS in PRE was 4.02 days (IQR: 3.26–4.27) compared with 2.37 days (IQR: 2.21–3.26) in POST (p < 0.001). Mean maximum POD2 pain score was 5.28 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.86) in PRE compared with 4.67 (SD = 1.63) in POST (p = 0.04). Conclusion ERAS protocol was associated with decreased postoperative opioid use, shorter LOS, and decreased pain after CD. Key Points

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document